Engineering topics

Housen, Kevin R.

Publications and source records attributed to Housen, Kevin R..

8 records

NASA NTRS2012

Craters Without Ejecta

A significant portion of the Solar System's population of minor bodies may be quite porous. A unique aspect of crater formation in porous bodies is that large craters may form without the ejecta deposits that are associated with craters on less porous bodies. In this paper. laboratory experiments and scaling theories are used to identify the conditions under which ejecta deposits are suppressed. The results are consistent with the interpretation that large craters on asteroid Mathilde (porosity approx. 50%) and Saturn's moon Hyperion (porosity >40%) apparently formed without producing Significant ejecta deposits. while smaller bodies do have notable regoliths.

Housen, Kevin R.↗

NASA NTRS2002

Experimental Simulations of Large-Scale Collisions

This report summarizes research on the effects of target porosity on the mechanics of impact cratering. Impact experiments conducted on a centrifuge provide direct simulations of large-scale cratering on porous asteroids. The experiments show that large craters in porous materials form mostly by compaction, with essentially no deposition of material into the ejecta blanket that is a signature of cratering in less-porous materials. The ratio of ejecta mass to crater mass is shown to decrease with increasing crater size or target porosity. These results are consistent with the observation that large closely-packed craters on asteroid Mathilde appear to have formed without degradation to earlier craters.

Housen, Kevin R.↗

NASA NTRS1999

Scale Effects in Strength-Dominated Collisions of Rocky Asteroids

The application of laboratory collision experimental results to the larger scales of asteroid impacts is complicated by the fact that the dynamic strength of rock typically decreases as the loading duration increases. Because loading times increase with the size scale of a collision, large bodies are effectively weaker than small ones. While this effect has been postulated for over a decade, it has never been verified in actual collision experiments. This paper summarizes collision tests performed under the conditions required to examine scale effects, i.e., increasing the size scale of the experiment while holding the impact velocity and impact kinetic energy per target mass constant. Granite targets are used, with a diameter variation of a factor of 18. The larger targets experienced significantly more collisional damage than small ones, confirming a decrease in dynamic strength with increasing size scale. The results are compared to a scaling model based on the concept that fragmentation is accomplished through the growth and coalescence of preexisting flaws. Measurements of the actual flaw-size distribution are used to validate the model. Field observations of flaw and fault sizes at scales to 10 km are used to construct a scaling model that is believed to apply to the shattering of a wide range of rock types. The results show that kilometer-sized rocky bodies may be significantly weaker than indicated by previous estimates.

Housen, Kevin R.↗

NASA NTRS1999

Compaction as the Origin of the Unusual Craters on the Asteroid Mathilde

Asteroid Mathilde has been pummeled by at least five giant impacts (Figure 1). Previous experience with cratering suggests Mathilde's giant craters should each be surrounded by kilometer-deep blankets of ejecta, i.e. material excavated during the impact events. Curiously, there appears to be very little ejecta around Mathilde's craters; they show no evidence of filling by ejecta from adjacent large craters. A previous explanation for the missing ejecta, based on computer simulations, is that Mathilde's unusually high porosity (50 +/- 20%) confines the deposited impact kinetic energy to a localized volume, and produces excavation velocities so high (greater than approximately 20m/s) that nearly all ejecta escape Mathilde's gravitational field. Here we report on laboratory experiments in a highly porous material that give a different explanation. The crater is formed primarily by compaction, not excavation. The small amount of material that is lofted has velocities and ranges so small that nearly all of it is re-deposited within the crater bowl, thereby sparing neighboring craters from ejecta in-filling. This peculiar style of cratering implies that highly porous asteroids are minor contributors of meteorites, because essentially no ejecta escape these asteroids.

Housen, Kevin R.↗

NASA NTRS1991

Laboratory simulations of large scale fragmentation events

Results are presented from fragmentation experiments at elevated external pressure; the application of overpressure to a small target allows the experiment to match the lithospheric compressive stress of a larger body's interior. With increasing overpressure, the fragmentation undergoes a transition, from a material strength-dominated regime to one that is dominated by applied overpressure, analogous to the transition from strength to gravity effects. High pressure testing allows direct measurement of the energy/unit target mass requirement of catastrophic fragmentation due to compressive stresses.

Housen, Kevin R.↗

NASA NTRS1991

Cratering of the Uranian satellites

Available crater counts and their interpretations are reviewed, with emphasis on essential scaling considerations and comparisons with hypotheses developed for interpreting the cratering records on other planets and satellites. New approaches are employed to scaling based on new measurements of crater depths and morphology, which show craters in ice to be unexpectedly different from those in rock. It is found that the published crater counts on the Uranian satellites, despite mutual inconsistencies, can be interpreted as compatible with cratering by the heliocentric population of cometary bodies that was responsible for much of the cratering of the satellites of Jupiter and Saturn. Scaling arguments are applied to the catastrophic breakup of icy satellites and ring particles. The importance of large-scale collisions in disrupting the inner Uranian satellites is found to depend on the shape of the size distribution of cometary bodies at large sizes.

Mckinnon, William B.↗

NASA NTRS1990

On the fragmentation of asteroids and planetary satellites

A general scaling model is defined which allows the extrapolation of small-scale collisional fragmentation experiment results, and existing collisional theories are considered within its framework. Scaling based exclusively upon the specific energy, Q, of the event (the ratio of projectile kinetic energy to the mass of the target body) is shown to hold when (1) the projectile and target material properties do not depend on size or time scales, and (2) the collision is governed by kinetic energy independently of impact velocity. Because neither of these conditions should hold, serious doubt is cast on the validity of Q's use as the sole scaling parameter.

Housen, Kevin R.↗

NASA NTRS1988

Crater size estimates for large-body terrestrial impact

Calculating the effects of impacts leading to global catastrophes requires knowledge of the impact process at very large size scales. This information cannot be obtained directly but must be inferred from subscale physical simulations, numerical simulations, and scaling laws. Schmidt and Holsapple presented scaling laws based upon laboratory-scale impact experiments performed on a centrifuge (Schmidt, 1980 and Schmidt and Holsapple, 1980). These experiments were used to develop scaling laws which were among the first to include gravity dependence associated with increasing event size. At that time using the results of experiments in dry sand and in water to provide bounds on crater size, they recognized that more precise bounds on large-body impact crater formation could be obtained with additional centrifuge experiments conducted in other geological media. In that previous work, simple power-law formulae were developed to relate final crater diameter to impactor size and velocity. In addition, Schmidt (1980) and Holsapple and Schmidt (1982) recognized that the energy scaling exponent is not a universal constant but depends upon the target media. Recently, Holsapple and Schmidt (1987) includes results for non-porous materials and provides a basis for estimating crater formation kinematics and final crater size. A revised set of scaling relationships for all crater parameters of interest are presented. These include results for various target media and include the kinematics of formation. Particular attention is given to possible limits brought about by very large impactors.

Schmidt, Robert M.↗