Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Hughes, Sydney

Publications and source records attributed to Hughes, Sydney.

26 records · Page 2

User Guide for the Public Industrial CO2 Capture Retrofit Database Models

OBSOLETE CCRD – SUPERSEDED<p>The National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) user manual accompanies the carbon capture retrofit database (CCRD) model that allows users to evaluate the cost of carbon capture on industrial sources (ammonia, cement, ethanol, hydrogen, and natural gas processing). The model was created by the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) based on the technical report titled &quot;Cost of Capturing CO2 from Industrial Sources&quot; (NETL/DOE-2022/3319). Revised 12/21/22.</p>

Hughes, Sydney↗

Industrial CO2 Capture Retrofit Database (IND CCRD)

OBSOLETE CCRD - SUPERSEDED<p>This carbon capture retrofit database (CCRD) model allows users to evaluate the cost of carbon capture on industrial sources (ammonia, cement, ethanol, hydrogen, and natural gas processing). The model was created by the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) based on the technical report titled Cost of Capturing CO2 from Industrial Sources (NETL/DOE-2022/3319). Revised 12/21/22.</p>

Hughes, Sydney↗

Conceptual Design of Pulverized Coal Electricity Generating Units for Flexible Operation

This National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) study addresses the conceptual design of greenfield pulverized coal (PC) plants intended for flexible rather than high capacity factor baseload operation. The United States has plentiful, low-cost natural gas resources - studies of aggressive decarbonization scenarios of the US energy sector suggest that the variability of carbon-free power can be economically addressed using dispatchable natural gas-fueled generation. Globally, natural gas resources are not as plentiful or low cost; consequently, some regions of the world are anticipated to continue to rely upon coal generation, even as they pursue decarbonization efforts. To support the increased utilization of variable renewable generation in these coal-dependent regions, plant designs must target low-capacity factor coal plants with increased emphasis on flexibility attributes such as start-up times, ramp rates, minimum load, and part-load heat rates. While much work has been performed on the improvement of the flexibility for existing coal plants originally designed for baseload service, little public literature exists on clean sheet design for flexible operation. This conceptual design study aims to define the features, performance characteristics, and costs for greenfield coal plants intended for flexible operation. Quantifying these characteristics provides critical information required by utility owners, grid planners, energy market modelers, and energy policy decision makers in coal-dependent regions of the world to better understand how coal-fired power plants can support a transition to low carbon generation.

20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS↗

Additional Analysis of Carbon Capture at Industrial Facilities

This poster provides summary cost details for a technoeconomic analysis of CO2 capture from flue gas generated by cement plants, conducted by U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory and presented at the 2022 Carbon Management Project Review Meeting held in Pittsburgh, PA (August 15-19, 2022). A range of modern cement plant configurations was considered, along with different fuel types (coal, coke, and natural gas) and two levels of CO2 capture (95% and 99%). The sensitivity of capture cost to a range of modeling assumptions (such as fuel price, financing assumptions, utilization rate, and plant size) was also conducted, to show possible cost ranges that could be expected for decarbonization of typical cement plants in the U.S.

Hughes, Sydney↗

Updated Cost And Performance Results for Natural Gas Combined Cycles (NGCC)

Updated cost and performance results are presented by NETL for both F and H Class turbines, presented at the Clearwater Clean Energy Conference in August, 2022. Results are presented for cases with and without 90% CO2 Capture. Preliminary results for high capture rates presented as well.

Fout, Timothy↗

Cost of Capturing CO 2 from Industrial Sources

This systems analysis by the National Energy Technology Laboratory's Strategic Systems Analysis and Engineering directorate) evaluates the cost and performance impacts of capturing CO 2 emissions from nine industrial sources (ammonia, ethylene oxide, and ethanol production, natural gas process, coal- and gas-to-liquids, refinery hydrogen production, iron and steel, and cement manufacturing). The industrial sectors examined are segregated according to the CO 2 purity level of the flue gas stream, prior to treatment. Certain sectors naturally produce a gas stream that is inherently high in CO 2 purity, and these sectors can achieve 99-100% removal. Other sectors produce a lower purity CO 2 flue gas stream and achieving 90-99% removal requires deeper levels of treatment, adding cost. In addition to the report that documents the analysis, a Carbon Capture Retrofit Database tool was also created that allows users to apply CO 2 capture to selected industries, to evaluate the cost of capture and compare across multiple plants, as well as across different industries. Users have the ability to change select input parameters (such as fuel price, capture rate, and financing assumptions) to evaluate the impact on industrial CO 2 capture economics.

20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS↗

Development of Advanced Ultra-Supercritical (AUSC) Pulverized Coal (PC) Plants

This report presents an independent assessment of pulverized coal (PC) power plants operating at advanced ultrasupercritical (AUSC) steam conditions. At AUSC conditions, PC plants generate electricity at higher efficiencies and with lower carbon footprints than PC plants operating at subcritical, supercritical (SC), and ultrasupercritical (USC) steam conditions, such as those examined in previous National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) reports. However, advanced materials are required for commercial operation under these AUSC steam conditions which impact plant economics. In 2001, the United States (U.S.) Department of Energy (DOE) with the Ohio Coal Development Office launched a research program carried out by a consortium of industry and research organizations (the AUSC Consortium) to develop the materials necessary to commercially demonstrate AUSC technology. The results contained in this report incorporate findings by the AUSC Consortium.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗