Engineering topics

J. Gross

Publications and source records attributed to J. Gross.

9 records

NASA NTRS2024

Planetary Science Training for Artemis Missions

Planetary geology training for Artemis crews and mission support teams is well underway. We recently reported on the development of our geology/planetary science training flow, and the cross-agency coordination efforts necessary for implementing the training [1, 2]. We discussed our progressive geology training program that starts with incoming astronaut classes, offers opportunities to maintain the geology proficiency between flight assignments, and trains the broader Artemis engineering-operations management community in geology and basic field methods [3, 4]. In this abstract, we outline and discuss our 2023 accomplishments and near-term plans for continued development of lunar science classroom content, field training objectives, and the delivery of geology training to astronauts and the Artemis mission engineers.

Artemis↗

NASA NTRS2021

Petrology, Geochemistry, and Pairing of Lunar Meteorites from the Dominion Range

Introduction: During the 2018-2019 Antarctic Search for Meteorites (ANSMET) field season in the Dominion Range (DOM), 7 lunar meteorite stones were collected: DOM 18242 (15.1 g), DOM 18244 (25.1 g), DOM 18262 (6.8 g), DOM 18509 (16.5 g), DOM 18543 (13.6 g), DOM 18666 (45.9 g), and DOM 18678 (11.6 g). Here we present the initial results of electron microprobe and X-ray computed tomography (XCT) studies of these stones and look at the details of their petrography and mineral chemistry, as well as investigate possible pairing relationships, both with each other and with previously described lunar meteorites. Most of the work presented here is on the DOM 18509, 18543, and 18678 stones; subsamples of the other stones are in hand and similar measurements will be made on them by the time of the meeting. Methods: Textures in DOM 18509, DOM 18543, and DOM 18678 were characterized in 2D by optical microscopy, backscattered electron (BSE) imaging and elemental X-ray images on thin sections, as well as in 3D by X-ray computed tomography (XCT) on sample chips. Mineral compositions were assessed through a combination of wavelength dispersive spectroscopy EPMA (electron probe microanalysis) and x-ray mapping on the JEOL 8530 at NASA JSC. The bulk composition of all three meteorites was determined based on analyses of the fusion crust glass. XCT analyses were done on the Nikon XTH 320 at NASA JSC. ICP-MS data on bulk rock subsamples for each meteorite will be carried out in the near future. Results: The stones are all similar in macroscopic appearance with a dark aphanitic matrix hosting a variety of small- to medium-sized angular mineral and lithic fragments (often light colored in nature) [1,2]. Based on EPMA and XCT results, the three meteorites are polymict regolith breccias comprised of mineral, glass, and lithic clasts ranging up to several mm in length. Melt veins run through all three meteorite samples. Mineral clasts in all 3 stones are dominated by pyroxene and plagioclase (An82-96), with minor amounts of SiO2, olivine (Fo1-52), and FeTi-oxides. Pyroxene grains are mostly Fe-rich pigeonite and augite, and larger clasts are normally zoned and have fine exsolution lamellae. The lithic clasts in all stones consists of: (1) basalt clasts that contain zoned pyroxene, plagioclase laths, and ilmenite, with minor silica and Fe-rich olivine; (2) granulitic clasts; (3) anorthosite clasts; (4) Si-rich clasts that also contain ilmenite, troilite, high-Ca pyroxene, fayalite, and K-feldspar likely mesostasis from late stage basalts). All three meteorites contain glassy fusion crust that is highly vesicular, high in FeO and Al2O3 (15-17 wt% each), ferroan (Mg# of 23-24), and moderately rich in TiO2 (1.4-1.8 wt%). The composition of the fusion crust can serve as a proxy for the bulk meteorite composition and is identical within error for all three meteorites. Implications: The lithic and mineral clasts in all three stones are similar in clast population and assemblages as well as mineral chemistry. In addition, the fusion crust composition, a proxy for bulk composition, is within error of each other for all three stones. Thus DOM 18509, DOM 18543, and DOM 18678 are almost certainly paired. Based on similarities in macroscopic description as well as preliminary classification data [1,2], all 7 lunar stones from DOM are likely paired, though additional quantitative analyses are needed to confirm this. The presence of spherules and vesicular fusion crusts indicates that the DOM pairing group is a regolith breccia. The presence of basaltic and gabbroic clasts as well as more feldspathic materials, suggest that the regolith from which these meteorites formed contained a mixture of feldspathic highland material and mare material, suggesting a possible provenance near a marehighlands boundary. No evidence of KREEPy lithologies have been observed so far in these meteorites, however, future ICP-MS data on bulk rock chips for the stones will reveal any KREEP component if present. The DOM pairing group has many similarities to previously described lunar breccia meteorite MET 01210, however more detailed compositional data will be needed to make a definitive comparison.

R.A. Zeigler↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

From Apollo to Artemis: Opening and Processing Lunar Core 73002 for the ANGSA Program

The Apollo mission returned 382 kg of lunar material comprising rock, soil and core samples. Some of these samples were intentionally set aside after their return from the Moon for future study, including samples sealed on the lunar surface, frozen samples and samples stored under Helium. The Apollo Next Generation Sample Analysis (ANGSA) program was established to study thesesamples, in part to help bridge the gap between Apollo and the next generation of lunar science and exploration.Apollo 17 double drive tube core sample 73001/73002 was collected about 50 meters east of Lara Crater from a landslide deposit originating from South Massif. After separating the two halves, the lower drive tube 73001 was immediately sealed in a special vacuum container. Both drive tubes were then placed in an Apollo Lunar Sample Return Container (ALSRC) and returned to Earth under vacuum. Total sample weight and length of 73001/73002 is 1263.0 g and up to 60 cm, with the upper drive 73002 containing 429.7 g and 23 cm of material ( which was then compressed to 18.5 cm during extrusion in the lab). We will present the meticulous methods involved in preparing for, opening and processing lunar core 73002, the upper half of the double drive tube. This includes searching and locating procedures and tools, practicing assembly and extrusion in a mock-up, and finally opening and dissecting the core sample 73002. Challenges (both expected and unexpected) encountered along the way and lessons learned during this project will help pave the way towards improving future lunar sample return missions and advancing insight into the Moon’s history

C. H. Krysher↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Preliminary Examination Process of Apollo Core 73002 - Insights and Lessons Learned From ANGSA for Future Sample Return Missions

Apollo Sample 73002 is part of a 2-foot long “drive tube” (73001/73002) of regolith that was collected from a landslide deposit near Lara Crater at the Apollo 17 site, Station 3. The double drive tube is believed to have penetrated a lunar landslide deposit that was transported from the slope of the South Massif into the TLV [1]. As part of the ANGSA (Apollo Next Generation Sample Analyses) initiative, preparing preliminary examination (PE) catalog of 73002 is a crucial first step for the early identification of material types such as rock fragments, and potential stratigraphy within the core. PE of Apollo core 73002 is distinct from science activities with the main goal to produces a sample catalog with a level of detail about sample characterization that is sufficient for the ANGSA PIs (and later on the lunar sample community) to select and request the samples to conduct their individual, scientific studies. Ultimately, the PE catalog of 73002 will help to establish a better understanding of the stratigraphy of the land slide deposit; the processes of the landslide including the trigger(s) and possibly number of landslide events, as well as the role of volatiles [1] and will aid in the careful preservation of the material for future studies [2].

Apollo↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Processing Frozen Apollo Samples in a Nitrogen Environment

A few weeks after their return to Earth, several Apollo 17 regolith sample splits and one Apollo 17 basalt were frozen at -20˚C (under dry gaseous N2 like all other pristine Apollo samples), and have remained essentially unstudied within the Apollo sample collection at NASA’s Johnson Space Center (JSC). As part of the Apollo Next Generation Sample Analysis (ANGSA) project, these frozen samples were selected for consortium study in 2019. Although the samples themselves were kept at -20˚C for nearly 50 years, the JSC Curation office has lacked a facility for processing frozen samples under pristine Apollo processing conditions. A temporary lab for this work was designed, built, and tested. Procedures were then developed for working in this unique environment, and the facility was sucessfully used to process the frozen Apollo samples for scientific allocation.

ANGSA↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Volatile Abundances of Apatite in CK and R Chondrites: Implications for Apatite Volatile Records in Oxidized and Thermally Altered Chondrite Parent Bodies

The mineral apatite [Ca5(PO4)3(F,Cl,OH)] is one of the primary mineralogical reservoirs for phosphorus on Earth, and it is a common phosphate mineral within a broad range of extraterrestrial samples. Naturally occurring apatite hosts F, Cl, and OH as essential structural constituents, and all three make up the apatite endmembers fluorapatite, chlorapatite, and hydroxylapatite, respectively. The presence of apatite in chondrite parent bodies indicates that apatite may hold a record of volatiles and their associated processes during the nascent stages of planetesimal formation and evolution.

F. M. McCubbin↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Investigating Pyroclastic Volcanism in the Taurus-Littrow Valley (TLV) Using the Station 3 Double Drive Tube 73001-73002

Well over 100 pyroclastic deposits have been identified on the Moon. Eruptive processes such as represented by these deposits transported endogenous volatiles from the Moon’s mantle to its surface. Debris from pyroclastic deposits has been identified in all Apollo and Luna samples. The high-Ti pyroclastic de- posit sampled at Shorty Crater by the Station 4 double drive tube (74001-74002) is our best sampling of these types of deposits. Samples 78500 and 78526, NAC images of fissures in the Sculptured Hills, ash identified in 70001-7, and other green volcanic glass indicate that very low-Ti basalt (VLT) erup- tions also occurred in TLV. The double drive tube core being investigated by the ANGSA initiative provides an- other view of TLV pyroclastic eruptions. The regolith in 73001-73002 and the regolith breccias therein have nu- merous pyroclastic beads. Some individual regolith brec- cia fragments have abundant pyroclastic beads (>50 in a polished surface). In this work, we address the following questions. Do these glass beads overlap in composition with those sampled elsewhere in the TLV or do they rec- ord another episode of pyroclastic eruption? Are the magmas associated with pyroclastic eruptions petroge- netically related to the crystalline mare basalts in the TLV? Finally, is the volatile record of the pyroclastic eruptions better preserved in the newly opened and spe- cially contained Station 3 double drive tube core?

C.K. Shearer↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Petrologic Comparison of High- and Low-Titanium Basalt Clasts Derived From ANGSA Core 73001

Volatile elements and compounds significantly influence the properties and behavior of magma, including ascent and eruptive processes. Basalts record a complicated history of the volatile species inherent to their parental magma, and the processes, such as degassing, that change these volatile inventories. On the Moon, outstanding questions remain concerning the behavior of magmatic volatiles and their roles in the evolution of lunar magmas and the formation of mare basalts. As part of the Apollo Next Generation Sample Analysis (ANGSA) program, we are investigating the petrogenesis of two basalt clasts collected from the recently processed Apollo 17 drive tube, 73001. Our team is studying the petrology of the two basalt clasts in 2D and 3D. Recent work has highlighted the utility of coupling traditional 2D methods with 3D measurements to better understand the crystallization and degassing histories of lunar lava flows. We are also investigating the volatile inventory of the samples through in situ studies of volatile-bearing phases, like apatite, to understand the eruptive signatures and degassing histories of low-titanium and high-titanium lunar basalts. At the upcoming conference, we will present the first detailed study of the 2D and 3D mineralogy, textures, 3D vesiculation, and chemistry of these basalt clasts to shed light on their magmatic, volcanic, and post-eruptive histories.

Basalt↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Preliminary Characterization of Spinel Troctolite Clast Identified in Apollo Next Generation Sample Analysis (ANGSA) Core 73002

The lunar magnesian (Mg-) suite is a diverse lithological group composed of Mg-rich mafic minerals. The Mg-suite consists primarily of troctolites, norites, gabbronorites, and spinel troctolites. These rocks exhibit contradictory geochemical traits, with mafic minerals bearing high Mg# (molar 100×Mg/[Mg+Fe]) indicating primitive parental magmas, but also plagioclase saturation and enrichments in incompatible trace elements (i.e., KREEP) indicate more evolved parental magmas. A variety of models have been invoked to explain the occurrence and petrogenesis of the Mg-suite. Here, we report on a new spinel troctolite clast found in Apollo Next Generation Sample Analysis (ANGSA) program core 73002. Sample 73002 was acquired at Station 3 during Apollo 17 as the upper part of a double-drive tube with sample 73001. During processing, the spinel troctolite clast (0.066 g) was found at the 4.0–4.5 cm depth interval.

A. C. Stadermann↗