Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

J. L. Burch

Publications and source records attributed to J. L. Burch.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2023

Reconnection in a Pinch

A recently published analysis of current sheets has updated the classic Harris 1D static solution by considering multiple classes of charged particle trajectories in a generalized and dynamic current sheet. It uses a 1D PIC simulation to describe dynamic pinching and bifurcation of the current sheet. These 1D results strongly suggest that properties of the inflowing plasma, including the plasma beta, have an important effect on the equilibrium thickness of the pinched current sheet. Since 1D studies cannot describe magnetic reconnection, the time appears right to carry such 1D studies over to 2D or 3D simulations to explore current sheet thickness effects on reconnection. The Magnetospheric Multiscale Mission (MMS), with its well-resolved multipoint measurements of collisionless plasma and fields, has found that collisionless reconnection is accompanied by non-adiabatic motions of electrons that only occur in magnetic structures with a narrow scale comparable to electron inertial lengths (d e ). The recent 1D studies suggest that a plasma pinch to such scales may only occur for inflowing magnetized plasmas with relatively low plasma beta. We conclude that a parametric exploration of simulated and observed reconnection inflow conditions, particularly plasma beta, should shed light on the enablement of reconnection in collisionless plasmas.

reconnection↗
NASA NTRS2023

Quantifying the Agyrotropy of Proton and Electron Heating in Turbulent Plasmas

An important aspect of energy dissipation in weakly collisional plasmas is that of energy partitioning between different species (e.g., protons and electrons) and between different energy channels. Here we analyse pressure–strain interaction to quantify the fractions of isotropic compressive, gyrotropic, and nongyrotropic heating for each species. An analysis of kinetic turbulence simulations is compared and contrasted with corresponding observational results from Magnetospheric Multiscale Mission data in the magnetosheath. In assessing how protons and electrons respond to different ingredients of the pressure–strain interaction, we find that compressive heating is stronger than incompressive heating in the magnetosheath for both electrons and protons, while incompressive heating is stronger in kinetic plasma turbulence simulations. Concerning incompressive heating, the gyrotropic contribution for electrons is dominant over the nongyrotropic contribution, while for protons nongyrotropic heating is enhanced in both simulations and observations. Variations with plasma β are also discussed, and protons tend to gain more heating with increasing β.

Yan Yang↗
NASA NTRS2020

Microscopic, Multipoint Characterization of Foreshock Bubbles With Magnetosphere Multiscale (MMS)

This work presents the first detailed analysis of foreshock bubbles (FBs) using high‐resolution Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) data. Between October 2017 and January 2019, MMS captured 10 foreshock transient events with burst resolution data that we show are consistent with FBs. One “textbook” event is examined and described in detail. Employing the multipoint nature of MMS, we demonstrate how the size and orientation, expansion speed, and distance since formation can be estimated. From all 10 events, FB sizes ranged from 1.1 to 9.9 RE (average of 4.4 RE), and expansion speeds ranged from 139 to 377 km/s (average of 257 km/s). FBs formed under a usual range of solar wind conditions between 3 and 20 RE upstream of Earth's bow shock. We also report on new features of FBs: deep and localized magnetic “holes” within the cores of FBs, where the total field strength drops to <1 nT.

D. L. Turner↗
NASA NTRS2020

Characteristics of Escaping Magnetospheric Ions Associated with Magnetic Field Fluctuations

The four Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) spacecraft observed a hot ow anomaly (HFA) at the boundary of the quasi-parallel and quasi-perpendicular bow shock and energetic (E > 50 keV) ion bursts exhibitinginverse dispersion in the magnetosheath on 28 December 2015. We consider the possibility that the ions seen both upstream in the foreshock and down-stream in the magnetosheath originate from the magnetosphere. The ion composition ratios, flux levels, and the spectral slopes of the energetic ion energy spectra observed in the region upstream from the bow shock and in themagnetosheath are similar to those in the outer magnetosphere but significantly differ from those seen further upstream from the bow shock at ACE. We can exclude an explanation of the particle source in terms of HFA acceleration. A simulation shows that escaping magnetospheric ions can be scattered and transported across the magnetosheath. Ground magnetometer observations indicate that a solar wind pressure decrease subsequently allows the bow shock to move outward past the MMS spacecraft placing them in the magnetosheath. This was followed by a pressure increase in the magnetosphere. We posit that the enhanced pressure applied to the magnetosphere accelerates the escaping magnetospheric ions (the betatron acceleration), resulting in the inverse dispersion.

S. H. Lee↗