Engineering topics

James H. Stephenson

Publications and source records attributed to James H. Stephenson.

6 records

NASA NTRS2021

Medium-Sized Helicopter Noise Abatement Flight Test Data Report

Helicopter noise has consistently hindered operations within urban areas and surrounding communities. To combat this, an extensive flight test campaign, described herein, was conducted to gather acoustic data to support helicopter noise research (e.g., physics-based modeling, operational planning, etc.). Acoustic measurements were collected from four helicopters in the medium-sized weight class with maximum takeoff gross weights between 7,400 and 14,200 lb: a Bell 205 “Huey”, a Sikorsky S-76D, a Leonardo AW139, and a US Coast Guard MH-65 Dolphin (a variant of the commercial Airbus AS365 Dauphin). Each aircraft per- formed a subset of level flyovers, steady descents, turns with various initial conditions, and noise abatement approaches. A distributed ground microphone array spanning approximately 2,000 by 4,000 ft collected measurements of each flyover event. Additionally, a dedicated semicircular microphone array was used for gathering acoustic measurements of static conditions (e.g., hover). This report provides an overview of the flight test methodology, conditions tested, equipment used, and details of the accompanying distribution dataset. Figures of sample results generated for each test point are included to enable comparison and selection of the data at the discretion of the user. Specifically, source noise hemispheres of the steady flight conditions illustrate directivity of over- all levels. Noise contours over the array provide insight into the ground levels associated with approaches and turning events. These data figures are derived from the original acoustic pressure-time histories and vehicle tracking data that are provided in the distribution dataset.

Rotorcraft↗

NASA NTRS2021

Characterizing the Effects of Two Ground-based Outdoor Microphone Configurations

Multiple International and Federal regulations stipulate the acquisition of aircraft noise shall be conducted using inverted pressure microphones over a round ground board. These ground boards are used to provide an acoustically hard reflecting surface, limiting the effects of the potentially absorptive ground local to the test location. The microphone location is also specified to be offset from the center of the board to limit the effects of acoustic diffraction off the board edge. In order to determine the effects of the ground board on the measured acoustic signal, a comprehensive measurement campaign was undertaken at NASA Langley Research Center. The experimental setup included multiple ground board configurations placed on top of a sand pit, in an otherwise anechoic chamber. Ground board configurations included a microphone inverted and offset over the round ground board and a microphone offset and flush mounted in the ground board.White noise was then used to investigate the ground board effects on the recorded signal. Normal impedance measurements were also acquired to determine the reflection coefficients of the sand and ground boards. Experimental results are discussed, along with implications for future research and development.Results indicate that both microphone configurations perform adequately up to 10 kHz. When the ground substrate is a soft material and the sound comes in at angles near grazing incidence the sound energy is attenuated above 1 kHz. Additionally, the plastic material used to construct the ground boards was found to be acoustically hard between 0.1 –3.0 kHz, and likely extending to higher frequencies.

Mark C. Anderson↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Development and Validation of Generic Maneuvering Flight Noise Abatement Guidance for Helicopters

An extensive flight test campaign has been conducted to look into developing actionable advice for pilots of today’s vehicles to reduce their acoustic footprints. Ten distinct vehicles were tested at three different test ranges, with nine of the vehicles’ data being documented here. Twelve pairs of turning conditions were tested to determine their effect on blade-vortex interaction noise. Each turning flight condition was evaluated using the peak A-weighted, band-limited (50 Hz - 2500 Hz), sound pressure level measured throughout the maneuver. This metric was a surrogate for blade-vortex interaction noise, and the difference between the peak values of each turning pair was investigated. That peak value difference was subsequently corrected by the offset from the intended vehicle altitude at turn initiation from the actual altitude at initiation. The corrected amplitudes were investigated and grouped into six validated actionable guidance principles that can be given to pilots to immediately reduce their acoustic footprint during operations.

Flight Test↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Medium-Sized Helicopter Noise Abatement Flight Test

An extensive flight test campaign was recently completed which aims to reduce the noise generated by helicopters in an effort to improve community acceptance. Using a ground-based microphone array, acoustic measurements were acquired on helicopters in the medium-size vehicle weight class over a number of flight conditions including steady level flight, steady descents, and approaches. While data were collected across four helicopters, the Leonardo AW139 and Sikorsky S-76D will be the focus of this paper. The extent of measured ground noise con- tours was limited due to the site constraints. Thus, the Noise Informed Community Environment Operations Planning System (NICEOPS) in conjunction with the flight test data was used to estimate how changes in the operating procedures impact noise exposure over a wider area during approaches. It was found that even small longitudinal accelerations can have a substantial influence on the noise generation processes during approach and must be modeled appropriately to develop new flight procedures which minimize the acoustic impact on the ground.

Flight Testing↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Aeroacoustic Measurements from the Aerodynamic and Acoustic Rotorprop Test (AART) in the National Full-Scale Aerodynamics Complex (NFAC) 40- by 80-Foot Wind Tunnel

Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) designs typically have aerodynamic configurations that result in complex aerodynamic and acoustic conditions, such as wing and propeller interaction. In response, the Aerodynamic and Acoustic Rotorprop Test (AART) Program was implemented, a primary objective of which was to determine the aerodynamics and acoustics related to an auxiliary propulsor mounted behind an isolated wing in the National Full-Scale Aerodynamics Complex (NFAC) 40-by 80-Foot Wind Tunnel. Three configurations (no wing, half wing, and full wing) were tested, with conditions including variation of the propeller speed, wind tunnel Mach number, and Yaw. The acoustic set up, processing, and analysis are discussed along with the known issues for this complex data set. The interaction of upstream bodies and the resulting substantial increase in acoustic emissions are discussed in detail.

Propeller↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

EVALUATION OF ACOUSTIC SNAPSHOT ARRAYS FOR ROTORCRAFT SOURCE NOISE CHARACTERIZATION

Historical development of acoustic hemispheres has required steady flight of a rotorcraft vehicle across a large linear array of microphones. The US Army, NASA, and Navy recently conducted a rotorcraft acoustics flight test in which multiple “snapshot” microphone arrays were used alongside a traditional linear microphone array. The snapshot arrays allow for a near instantaneous capture of rotorcraft acoustic emissions, without the need for steady flight. Development of the snapshot array is contained herein, and an evaluation of effectiveness of the array during adverse weather conditions. The snapshot arrays captured significant variation in acoustic emissions throughout a single run and between multiple runs of similar conditions. Hemispheres were created and modelled in land-use planning software and an investigation of A-weighted Sound Exposure Level (SEL [dBA]) was conducted. Sideline predictions of SEL compared well (within 0.1 dBA) between traditional and snapshot arrays, while centre line locations were less favourable with a difference of 1.6 dBA. Future refinement is required for the snapshot array technique, including advanced design of microphone placement and employing a semiempirical method to interpolate between measurement points, instead of the linear frequency weighting conventionally employed.

Rotorcraft↗