Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

James R L Koch

Publications and source records attributed to James R L Koch.

4 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

LAVA CFD Analysis of the Check Standard Model within the Langley Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel

This paper is part of an e ort to assess the current capability of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) to accurately predict the experimental forces and base pressure on the Check Standard Model (CSM). The wind tunnel data for this model is gathered during annual monitoring of test-to-test repeatability for the Langley Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel (LUPWT). A blind database designed to help quantify the uncertainty of simulating LUPWT for the CSM repeatability tests was run using the Launch, Ascent and Vehicle Aerodynamics (LAVA) CFD code. The Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations were used for the predictions presented in the paper. Prior to running the database, best practices were established both for simulating and characterizing the ow of the high-speed legof the LUPWT where the test took place, as well the CSM when inserted within its test section.

ARMD↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Wall-Modeled Large-Eddy Simulations of a Swept Wing with Leading-Edge Ice

The aerodynamic performance of a swept wing derived from the Common Research Model wing with high-fidelity and smooth leading-edge ice shapes is evaluated using wall-modeled large-eddy simulations. Two mesh paradigms are considered within the Launch, Ascent, and Vehicle Aerodynamics framework: structured hybrid curvilinear body-fitted/immersed-boundary and unstructured Voronoi. The curvilinear approach models the effect of the ice on the flow through penalty terms and the Voronoi strategy includes the ice representation directly in the mesh.Aerodynamic loads, surface pressure profiles, and skin-friction streamlines are compared against experimental results collected at the Wichita State University wind tunnel at a Mach number of 0.18 and a Reynolds number per mean aerodynamic chord of 1.6 million. For the curvilinear simulations with high-fidelity ice, results are sensitive to spanwise mesh resolution near the leading edge, where insufficient spanwise resolution leads to a spanwise running vortexaft of the high-fidelity ice, which is partially removed with increasing spanwise resolution. For the Voronoi simulations with high-fidelity ice, refining the mesh led to good convergence towards the experimental results with the best case demonstrating a maximum discrepancy of three lift counts relative to the experiment across a range of angles of attack from about 5 to 24 degrees, validating the shrink-wrapping procedure used for the ice. For the smooth ice, the curvilinear approach consistently under-predicted the upper surface suction leading to an under-prediction in lift, but did not demonstrate the pronounced over-prediction in upper surface suction near the leading edge observed in the Voronoi simulations.

AATT↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Towards Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Using an Immersed Boundary Overset Grid Method

Traditional Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes grid methods applied to aerodynamic shapeoptimization can struggle with the deformation of surface and volume grids at componentintersections, such as at wing-fuselage junctions. To overcome this, we propose an approachwhich utilizes curvilinear overset grids for the discretization of the domain, with the presenceof the body modeled using an immersed boundary method. This approach handles complexgeometries without the need for their explicit integration into the grid. The goal of this approachis to reduce grid generation time and allow for greater geometric freedom for component-basedaerodynamic shape optimization. Two different methods are presented: a source-term-basedand a ghost-node-based immersed boundary method. Flow analyses and adjoint solutionsobtained using the proposed methods show promising comparisons with standard body-fittedgrid methods. Preliminary aerodynamic shape optimization results obtained using one of theimmersed boundary methods are also presented.

TTT↗