Engineering topics

James R Reynolds

Publications and source records attributed to James R Reynolds.

2 records

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Flight Performance Maneuver Planning for NASA’s X-57 “Maxwell” Flight Demonstrator – Part 2: Power-On Effects

Distributed Electric Propulsion technology as envisioned for NASA’s X-57 “Maxwell” flight demonstrator concept was designed to increase high-speed cruise efficiency compared to a combustion-powered general aviation baseline. A portion of this increased efficiency was due to beneficial aero-propulsive interaction inherent to the distributed propulsion architecture. The measure of the increase in efficiency between a conventional and distributed propulsion wing was to be determined by comparing flight test data from the electrically powered, conventional wing X-57 Mod II configuration to data obtained from the electrically powered, distributed propulsion wing X-57 Mod III/IV configuration. Flight test maneuvers that accommodate errors in instrumentation and the flight test environment were previously developed to establish the power-off drag characteristics for all X-57 configurations. In this paper, test points and maneuvers are evaluated to establish the installed and gross thrust that build upon the power-off drag estimates. Analysis of the proposed power-on maneuvers shows that the selected test points and measurement techniques could generate installed thrust estimates within 3-7% (at the 50% confidence level) of the actual values if each maneuver is conducted over a time period of 40 seconds.

Nicholas K Borer↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Distributed Thrust Takeoff for the NASA X-57 Mod IV Flight Demonstrator

The Mod IV configuration of the X-57 flight demonstrator concept featured two forms of distributed electric propulsion—one cruise propulsor at each wingtip for primary propulsion that enabled favorable interaction with the wingtip vortex, and six high-lift propulsors distributed along the leading edge of each wing to enhance low-speed flight characteristics. The power system that fed these propulsors was arranged in two independent power buses. This unique arrangement did not lend itself to traditional “one engine inoperative” methods for determining performance after a critical failure in the propulsion system. Several potential failure scenarios were identified as potential “critical loss of thrust” events, and experiments that included pilot-in-the-loop simulation with the project test pilots were conducted to determine if these events would result in adequate handling and performance. Prior research showed that a total failure of one of the cruise motors during takeoff or initial climb could result in unacceptable performance for a traditional full-power takeoff. A new technique dubbed Distributed Thrust Takeoff (DiTTo) was developed to reduce the impact of the thrust asymmetry and total loss of thrust that could occur in any of the critical loss of thrust scenarios. The results showed that adequate performance and handling qualities could be achieved in each of the critical failure scenarios when using the DiTTo technique.

Distributed Propulsion, Electric Propulsion, Criti↗