Structural optimization by multilevel decomposition
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Engineering topics
Publications and source records attributed to James, B. B..
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The developments toward a general multilevel optimization capability and results for a three-level structural optimization are described. The method partitions a structure into a number of substructuring levels where each substructure corresponds to a subsystem in the general case of an engineering system. The method is illustrated by a portal framework that decomposes into individual beams. Each beam is a box that can be further decomposed into stiffened plates. Substructuring for this example spans three different levels: (1) the bottom level of finite elements representing the plates; (2) an intermediate level of beams treated as substructures; and (3) the top level for the assembled structure. The three-level case is now considered to be qualitatively complete.
In the present development history for both a general multilevel optimization capability and a three-level structural optimization, which is taken to be qualitatively equivalent to a multilevel implementation, a structure is partitioned into a number of substructuring levels where each substructure corresponds to a subsystem. The method is illustrated by a portal framework that decomposes into individual beams, each of which is a box that can be further decomposed into stiffened plates. Substructuring therefore spans three different levels. Since further extensions would only add to the intermediate substructuring levels, the three-level case is qualitatively complete.