Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Jarvis A Caffrey

Publications and source records attributed to Jarvis A Caffrey.

5 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Radiation Effects Considerations for Instrumentation and Control in Space Nuclear Systems

Radiation effects in electrical, electronic, electro-motive, and electro-optical (EEEE) hardware encompass a complex variety of interactions, processes, environments, and an evolving landscape of relevant hardware. Appropriately mitigating the effects of radiation in sensors, data acquisition, and control hardware is among the most significant challenges associated with deploying space nuclear power and propulsion systems. The expertise within EEEE radiation effects disciplines require working knowledge that is at least as complex and diverse as the problem itself, but that should not dissuade stakeholders and engineers in adjacent disciplines from attempting to understand the general principles associated with the problem at hand. This brief overview seeks to bring to the foreground a set of relevant topics that are of special importance for space nuclear propulsion applications that involve high rates of neutron and gamma radiation. The unique set of environments and design requirements for space nuclear systems mean that the experience and utility for methods applied to typical spaceflight hardware or terrestrial nuclear systems must not be applied naively. Forward consideration on the applicability of testing methods applied to either existing or bespoke hardware is likely to drive early decisions on system-wide radiation effects mitigation strategies, and will influence procurement requirements for providers of radiation tolerant hardware who are unlikely to have experience in this unique set of environments. Radiation hardness assurance (RHA) guidance should be adapted and emphasize the importance of hardware testing in the relevant environment. These must consider the combined effects of temperature, total ionizing dose (TID), non-ionizing/displacement damage (TNID/DD), and single event effects (SEE), and should consider the impacts of flux (rate) in addition to cumulative effects.

Radiation↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

The Potential Effects of Radiation-Caused Tank Heating in Nuclear Thermal Propulsion Applications

Nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) vehicles provide a strong option for crewed missions to Mars. Such designs which use cryogenic hydrogen as the stored propellant can provide ISP in excess of 850 seconds and thrusts capable of accelerations roughly comparable to typical in-space chemical engines thus enabling shorter travel times and wider mission abort windows. Given those capabilities, NTP engines provide a viable option for travel to Mars. Nonetheless, complications arise as the nuclear reactions in the reactor core not only heat the propellant but also emit radiation which affects components across the vehicle. In particular, the radiation which reaches the propellant tanks can heat the stored cryogenic propellant, altering the temperature of the propellant as it leaves the tank headed to the turbopump. Determining whether that tank heating causes significant heating of the outflowing propellant serves as an important question for any NTP vehicle design. Results show that warm propellant can cause buoyancy-driven fluid motion within the tank and ultimately can be drawn into the outflow from the tank, and thus must be accounted for in analysis and design of NTP vehicles.

Kalen E Braman↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

The Radsetta Stone – Establishing a Common Environment Taxonomy Across Space Nuclear Technologies

Qualitative descriptions, such as “high temperature” or “long exposure” vary substantially according to the context and can obfuscate messaging. A quantitative taxonomy for describing space nuclear environments - encompassing fission, radioisotope, and natural - has been established to enable clear communication across technology applications. Zones have been defined to partition environments with an intent to achieve a useful level of granularity. These zones enable a more detailed assessment than the Technology Readiness Level and can also be used to identify gaps and overlaps spanning space nuclear technologies. This framework has been named the Radsetta Stone – a paronomasia of the Rosetta Stone. There are two directions in which the Radsetta Stone can be used. The user may be a technology developer or a technology customer. The developer would use the Radsetta Stone to communicate the current state of the technology they are developing. The maximum zone for each parameter would then be used to state the current limit of their technology. The customer could use the Radsetta Stone to communicate the environmental conditions of their system. Zones would be associated with different locations within the system. The Radsetta Stone is intended to enable clear communication regarding space nuclear technology. The following legend and tables show the levels of the Radsetta Stone. These levels show success criteria gates in a similar manner as Technology Readiness Levels.

taxonomy↗