Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Jeff Dozier

Publications and source records attributed to Jeff Dozier.

10 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2023

How do tradeoffs in satellite spatial and temporal resolution impact snow water equivalent reconstruction?

Given the tradeoffs between spatial and temporal resolution, questions about resolution optimality are fundamental to the study of global snow. Answers to these questions will inform future scientific priorities and mission specifications. Heterogeneity of mountain snowpacks drives a need for daily snow cover mapping at the slope scale (≤30 m) that is unmet for a variety of scientific users, ranging from hydrologists to the military to wildlife biologists. But finer spatial resolution usually requires coarser temporal or spectral resolution. Thus, no single sensor can meet all these needs. Recently, constellations of satellites and fusion techniques have made noteworthy progress. The efficacy of two such recent advances is examined: (1) a fused MODIS–Landsat product with daily 30 m spatial resolution and (2) a harmonized Landsat 8 and Sentinel 2A and B (HLS) product with 3–4 d temporal and 30 m spatial resolution. State-of-the-art spectral unmixing techniques are applied to surface reflectance products from 1 and 2 to create snow cover and albedo maps. Then an energy balance model was run to reconstruct snow water equivalent (SWE). For validation, lidar-based Airborne Snow Observatory SWE estimates were used. Results show that reconstructed SWE forced with 30 m resolution snow cover has lower bias, a measure of basin-wide accuracy, than the baseline case using MODIS (463 m cell size) but greater mean absolute error, a measure of per-pixel accuracy. However, the differences in errors may be within uncertainties from scaling artifacts, e.g., basin boundary delineation. Other explanations are (1) the importance of daily acquisitions and (2) the limitations of downscaled forcings for reconstruction. Conclusions are as follows: (1) spectrally unmixed snow cover and snow albedo from MODIS continue to provide accurate forcings for snow models and (2) finer spatial and temporal resolution through sensor design, fusion techniques, and satellite constellations are the future for Earth observations, but existing moderate-resolution sensors still offer value.

Edward H. Bair↗
NASA NTRS2023

Shape from spectra

We introduce a new unified atmospheric–topographic correction approach that estimates surface geometry directly from the radiance measurement. Surface topography influences the at-sensor radiance measurement, making precise topography modeling critical in applications like vegetation or snow studies in mountainous terrain. Currently, elevation maps are used to derive topographic variables such as the slope and sky-view factor. This process is error-prone since static global digital elevation models do not generally achieve the accuracy required, and even minor mismatches in spatial resolution can introduce significant artifacts in downstream processing. Here we demonstrate that it is possible to estimate topographic parameters directly from spectral data, ensuring perfect physical consistency, temporal coincidence, and spatial alignment. We present experiments estimating topographic slope in two scenes in Southern California, with data from NASA’s Next Generation Airborne Visible/Near Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS-NG). We compared our radiance-based estimates against high-resolution lidar datasets. Our initial validation result showed a correlation of R 2 = 0.864 (n = 160) over the homogeneous surface of Beckman Auditorium’s cone-shaped roof on the Caltech campus in Pasadena, California. We then validate the model over a larger study site near Santa Clarita, California, finding R 2 = 0.923 (n = 40,000) in a 350 x 350m area. The accuracy of our model estimates, combined with its systematic advantages over the alternative, show the potential of the approach for use in both airborne campaigns and orbital missions.

Nimrod Carmon↗
NASA NTRS2021

Revisiting Topographic Horizons in the Era of Big Data and Parallel Computing

Widely used to calculate illumination geometry forestimates of solar and emitted longwave radiation, and forcorrecting remotely sensed data for topographic effects, digitalelevation models (DEMs) are now extensive globally at 10–30-mspatial resolution and locally at spatial resolutions down to afew centimeters. Globally, regionally, or locally, elevation datasetshave many grid points. Many software packages calculate gradi-ents over every grid cell or point, but in the mountains, shadingby nearby terrain must also be assessed. Terrain may obscure aslope that would otherwise face the Sun. Four decadesago, a fastmethod to calculate topographic horizons at every point in anelevation grid required computations related only linearly to thesize of the grid, but grids now have so many points that parallelcomputing still provides an advantage. Exploiting parallelismover terrain grids can use alternative strategies: among columnsof a rotated grid, or simultaneously at multiple rotation angles,or on different tiles of a grid. On a multi-processor machine, theimprovement in computing time approaches 2/3 the number ofprocessors deployed,

Jeff Dozier↗
NASA NTRS2021

Achieving Breakthroughs in Global Hydrologic Science by Unlocking the Power of Multisensor, Multidisciplinary Earth Observations

Over the last half century, remote sensing has transformed hydrologic science. Whereas early efforts were devoted to observation of discrete variables, we now consider spaceborne missions dedicated to interlinked global hydrologic processes.Furthermore, cloud computing and computational techniquesare accelerating analyses of these data. How will the hydrologic community use these new resources to better understand the world’s water and relatedchallenges facing society? In this Commentary, we suggest that optimizing the benefits of remote sensing for advancing hydrologic research will happen byintegratingmultidisciplinary and multisensor data, leveraging commercial satellite measurements, and employingdata assimilation, cloud computing, and machine learning.We provide several recommendations to these ends. Plain Language Summary Observations from satellites have transformed hydrologic science. Early efforts, five decades ago, mapped attributes like snow cover, rainfall, topography, and vegetation, but now we consider new missions specifically designed to study global hydrologic processes. We also take advantageof new technologies like cloud computing and artificial intelligence. We describe strategiesfor maximizing the benefits of remote sensing for hydrology, encouraging research across disciplines using multiple sensors, using new commercially available satellites, and combining remote sensing measurements with hydrologic models.

Michael Durand↗
NASA NTRS2021

Evaluation of VIIRS and MODIS snow cover fraction in High-Mountain Asia using Landsat 8 OLI

We present thefirst application of the Snow Covered Area and Grain size model (SCAG) tothe Visible Infrared imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) and assess these retrievals withfiner-resolution fractional snow cover maps from Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI).Because Landsat 8 OLI avoids saturation issues common to Landsat 1–7 in the visiblewavelengths, we re-assess the accuracy of the SCAG fractional snow cover maps fromModerate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) that were previously evaluatedusing data from earlier Landsat sensors. Use of the fractional snow cover maps fromLandsat 8 OLI shows a negative bias of−0.5% for MODSCAG and−1.3% for VIIRSCAG,whereas previous MODSCAG evaluations found a bias of−7.6% in the Himalaya. Wefindsimilar root mean squared error (RMSE) values of 0.133 and 0.125 for MODIS and VIIRS,respectively. The Recall statistic (probability of detection) for cells with more than 15%snow cover in this challenging steep topography was found to be 0.90 for both MODSCAGand VIIRSCAG, significantly higher than previous evaluations based on Landsat 5Thematic Mapper (TM) and 7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+). In addition,daily retrievals from MODIS and VIIRS are consistent across gradients of elevation, slope,and aspect. Different native resolutions of the gridded products at 1 km and 500 m forVIIRS and MODIS, respectively, result in snow cover maps showing a slightly differentdistribution of values with VIIRS having more mixed pixels and MODIS having 7% morepure snow pixels. Despite the resolution differences, the snow maps from both sensorsproduce similar total snow-covered areas and snow-line elevations in this region, withR2values of 0.98 and 0.88, respectively. Wefind that the SCAG algorithm performsconsistently across various spatial resolutions and that fractional snow cover mapsfrom the VIIRS instruments aboard Suomi NPP, JPPS–1, and JPPS–2 can be asuitable replacement as MODIS sensors reach their ends of life.

Karl Rittger↗
NASA NTRS2020

Snow Property Inversion from Remote Sensing (SPIReS): A Generalized Multispectral Unmixing Approach with Examples from MODIS and Landsat 8 OLI

Spectral mixture analysis has a history in mappingsnow, especially where mixed pixels prevail. Using multiplespectral bands rather than band ratios or band indices, retrievalsof snow properties that affect its albedo lead to more accu-rate estimates than widely used age-based models of albedoevolution. Nevertheless, there is substantial room for improve-ment. We present the Snow Property Inversion from RemoteSensing (SPIReS) approach, offering the following improve-ments: 1) Solutions for grain size and concentrations of lightabsorbing particles are computed simultaneously; 2) Only snowand snow-free endmembers are employed; 3) Cloud-maskingand smoothing are integrated; 4) Similar spectra are groupedtogether and interpolants are used to reduce computation time.The source codes are available in an open repository. Com-putation is fast enough that users can process imagery ondemand. Validation of retrievals from Landsat 8 operational landimager (OLI) and moderate-resolution imaging spectroradiome-ter (MODIS) against WorldView-2/3 and the Airborne SnowObservatory shows accurate detection of snow and estimatesof fractional snow cover. Validation of albedo shows low errorsusing terrain-correctedin situmeasurements. We conclude bydiscussing the applicability of this approach to any airborne orspaceborne multispectral sensor and options to further improve retrievals.

Edward H Blair↗