Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Jeffrey A Housman

Publications and source records attributed to Jeffrey A Housman.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2023

Anisotropic Mach Cone Aligned Mesh Adaptation for Low Boom Simulations

An automated off-body Mach cone aligned structured curvilinear grid generation procedure is presented for near-field computational fluid dynamics simulations. This procedure combines output-based indicators and mesh redistribution to perform anisotropic mesh adaptation while maintaining Mach cone alignment. Automation is achieved through a novel direction-based adaptation indicator formulation. The adaptation procedure is demonstrated on the JAXA Wing Body geometry and X-59 C608 demonstrator model from the Second and Third AIAA Sonic Boom Prediction Workshops, respectively. It is demonstrated that anisotropic mesh adaptation may result in a greater than fifty percent reduction in resource usage required to achieve the same level of accuracy as uniform and user constructed Mach cone aligned grids for near-field pressure signatures, ground-level overpressure signatures, and loudness metrics.

CST↗
NASA NTRS2023

Numerical Investigation of C L,max Prediction on the NASA High-Lift Common Research Model

An assessment of a Hybrid RANS/LES (HRLES) approach for C L,max prediction is presented for the NASA High-Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL). Both free air and wind tunnel configurations of the CRM-HL are investigated and the results are compared to the QinetiQ wind tunnel experiments and two other numerical approaches: Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) and Wall-Modeled Large Eddy Simulations (WMLES). For the free-air configuration, HRLES is shown to address some of the known shortcomings with RANS and prevent inboard and outboard flow separation particularly in the region of C L,max and post-stall. To achieve these improvements over RANS, LES-appropriate grids and numerical discretizations are required. It was also found that when applying HRLES to a RANS best practice grid and numerics that the HRLES method significantly underperformed RANS. For the in-tunnel configuration, HRLES showed good agreement with the loads, surface pressure and oil-flow photographs obtained in the experiment. HRLES was able to improve upon the RANS simulations, which showed a sharp loss of lift at the two highest angles-of-attack due to large scale inboard and outboard separation on the wing, by correctly predicting the corner flow separation and showing remarkably close agreement in the flow topologies with the experiment.

TTT↗
NASA NTRS2023

Fan Noise Predictions of the NASA Source Diagnostic Test Using Unsteady Simulations with LAVA Part I: Near-Field Aerodynamics and Turbulence

A sliding mesh technique within the Launch, Ascent, and Vehicle Aerodynamics (LAVA) computational framework is validated using the experimental dataset collected as part of the NASA Source Diagnostic Test (SDT) campaign. Two modeling approaches are explored: the unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier Stokes (URANS) with Spalart-Allmaras (SA) turbulence model closure, and a hybrid Reynolds-Averaged Navier Stokes/Large Eddy Simulation (RANS/LES) paradigm employing a Zonal Detached Eddy Simulation (ZDES) closure with enhanced shielding protection. Fan stage performance metrics, aerodynamic quantities and turbulent flow structures are analyzed in this work. Initial studies focusing on grid and time-step sensitivity are presented. Sensitivity to different variants of the SA turbulence model is analyzed, supporting the use of the baseline SA model in the production runs. Two conditions are analyzed in detail using URANS and hybrid RANS/LES (HRLES). Mean flow quantities are well-captured by both methods in the low-speed (approach) regime. While URANS misses all the upstream-propagating noise in the inlet due to the rotor-locked tones being evanescent in nature at subsonic fan tip speeds, HRLES captures this broadband component in its pressure field. At the high-speed (sideline) condition, URANS shows better agreement with the SDT data than HRLES in the interstage flow-field. In this regime, URANS captures the tonal content propagating through the inlet, since the tones are now cut-on. Both methods are suitable to capture fan stage performance metrics and mean flow quantities, but only HRLES is able to resolve the fine turbulent structures responsible for broadband noise. The results support the use of the sliding mesh technique implemented in this work for future turbomachinery applications within the LAVA solver framework.

AATT↗
NASA NTRS2023

Fan Noise Predictions of the NASA Source Diagnostic Test Using Unsteady Simulations with LAVA Part I: Near-Field Aerodynamics and Turbulence

A sliding mesh technique within the Launch, Ascent, and Vehicle Aerodynamics (LAVA) computational framework is validated using the experimental dataset collected as part of the NASA Source Diagnostic Test (SDT) campaign. Two modeling approaches are explored: the unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier Stokes (URANS) with Spalart-Allmaras (SA) turbulence model closure, and a hybrid Reynolds-Averaged Navier Stokes/Large Eddy Simulation (RANS/LES) paradigm employing a Zonal Detached Eddy Simulation (ZDES) closure with enhanced shielding protection. Fan stage performance metrics, aerodynamic quantities and turbulent flow structures are analyzed in this work. Initial studies focusing on grid and time-step sensitivity are presented. Sensitivity to different variants of the SA turbulence model is analyzed, supporting the use of the baseline SA model in the production runs. Two conditions are analyzed in detail using URANS and hybrid RANS/LES (HRLES). Mean flow quantities are well-captured by both methods in the low-speed (approach) regime. While URANS misses all the upstream-propagating noise in the inlet due to the rotor-locked tones being evanescent in nature at subsonic fan tip speeds, HRLES captures this broadband component in its pressure field. At the high-speed (sideline) condition, URANS shows better agreement with the SDT data than HRLES in the interstage flow-field. In this regime, URANS captures the tonal content propagating through the inlet, since the tones are now cut-on. Both methods are suitable to capture fan stage performance metrics and mean flow quantities, but only HRLES is able to resolve the fine turbulent structures responsible for broadband noise. The results support the use of the sliding mesh technique implemented in this work for future turbomachinery applications within the LAVA solver framework.

AATT↗
NASA NTRS2023

Unsteady RANS and Scale Resolving Simulations of Open Rotor Noise

Computational simulations using structured curvilinear overset grids with the Launch Ascent and Vehicle Aerodynamics (LAVA) framework are presented for predicting the aerodynamic and aeroacoustic behavior of a contra-rotating open rotor (CROR) propulsion system using a newly developed and computationally efficient sliding mesh technique. A comprehensive evaluation of two turbulence closure treatments is carried out as part of the scope of this work: Unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Simulation (URANS), and Hybrid RANS/LES (HRLES). The computed results are then validated against existing experimental measurements at both the nominal take-off and cruise flight conditions. To propagate the noise generated by the near-field CROR system, aeroacoustic analysis based on a frequency-domain permeable surface Ffowcs Williams-Hawkings (FW-H) approach is applied.

ARMD↗
NASA NTRS2023

Unsteady RANS and Scale Resolving Simulations of Open Rotor Noise

Computational simulations using structured curvilinear overset grids with the Launch Ascent and Vehicle Aerodynamics (LAVA) framework are presented for predicting the aerodynamic and aeroacoustic behavior of a contra-rotating open rotor (CROR) propulsion system using a newly developed and computationally efficient sliding mesh technique. A comprehensive evaluation of two turbulence closure treatments is carried out as part of the scope of this work: Unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Simulation (URANS), and Hybrid RANS/LES (HRLES). The computed results are then validated against existing experimental measurements at both the nominal take-off and cruise flight conditions. To propagate the noise generated by the near-field CROR system, aeroacoustic analysis based on a frequency-domain permeable surface Ffowcs Williams-Hawkings (FW-H) approach is applied.

ARMD↗
NASA NTRS2022

Comparison of Computational Predictions of the Mach 0.80 Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration with Experimental Data

The NASA Langley and Ames Research Centers have teamed together for comparisons of computational predictions of the Boeing Mach 0.80Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration with a high-speed experimental dataset. The Mach 0.80 TTBW vehicle is a high wing, high aspect ratio configuration, designed for a high lift-to-drag ratio. System studies have predicted significant fuel burn and emissions benefits with the TTBW technology moving toward meeting NASA Subsonic Transport Systems-Level-Metrics. A 4.5% scale Mach 0.80 design TTBW model was recently tested at the NASA Ames Research Center 11-by 11-Foot Transonic Wind Tunnel(11-Ft TWT),providing a valuable dataset to validate computational tools and investigate best practices as risk reduction efforts continue for the development of the advanced TTBW vehicle. The NASA Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) team has computed free-air flow solutions on the Mach 0.80 design flight configuration and two wind tunnel configuration variants using the USM3D and LAVA flow solvers. Accurate modeling of the configuration tested in the wind tunnel environment is critical to validating the CFD tools, thus the team has included the internal cavity region and sting in their modeling of the configuration, similar to that tested in the 11-Ft TWT. Overall, the CFD simulations compared well and show similar trends as the corrected experimental data for lift and drag polars. The CFD predicted lift curve is shifted in angle of attack from what was observed in the experiment. The shift in lift also was seen in the pitching moment comparison plots. CFD solutions were computed at constant CL test point values and showed overall very good agreement when comparing constant spanwise cuts of pressure coefficient data on the wing and strut with experimental data. CFD cavity corrections were also investigated using the 11-Ft TWT cavity correction method, similar to that used to correct the wind tunnel data. Results showed some improvement in pitching moment coefficient predictions, and an increase in drag, shifting the data to the right in drag polars, further from the experimental data at lower lift conditions, good agreement near the design CL, and slight improvement at the higher lift conditions.

Transonic Truss-Braced Wing↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Structured Overset and Unstructured Grid Simulations for the Third AIAA Sonic Boom Prediction Workshop

Predictions using the Launch Ascent and Vehicle Aerodynamics (LAVA) Unstructured and Structured Curvilinear solvers for the Biconvex and C608 geometries are compared in support of the 3rd AIAA Sonic Boom Prediction workshop. Description of the mesh generation techniques and numerical methods are provided along with a comparison of nearfield and far-field predictions with available experimental data as well as other workshop sub-missions. Strong consistency was observed between the Biconvex and C608 nearfield predictions across the two solvers used for this study, as well as validation and verification data. Additionally, near-field and farfield ground signature results using a combination of a truncated computational fluid dynamics (CFD) domain coupled to a mid-field space marching method and propagated to the ground using sBOOM will be discussed. This approach is shown to provide an efficient way to propagate near-field pressure signatures to the ground with the same accuracy as the near-field CFD coupled to sBOOM, but at less computational cost.

CST↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

High-Lift Common Research Model: RANS, HRLES and WMLES Perspectives for CLmax Prediction Using LAVA

A unified assessment of three turbulence treatments: Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes(RANS), Hybrid RANS/LES (HRLES) and Equilibrium Wall-Modelled Large Eddy Simulation(WMLES) is presented for the High-Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL). For the free-air configuration, steady-state RANS simulations show very accurate drag polar predictions in the low-𝛼linear regime. However, strong grid sensitivity is reported near the maximum lift-state(𝐶𝐿max), with finer-grids showing larger errors and predicting erroneous flow topologies on the wing. Our RANS simulations show that several corrections for the Spalart-Allmaras (SA)turbulence model widely used in the community lead to more erroneous results compared to the baseline closure, without exception. Both scale-resolving methods (HRLES and WMLES)address these drawbacks and predict an outboard separation pattern on the main element that is in good agreement with the oil flow photographs taken from the QinetiQ wind tunnel experiments, when LES-appropriate grids and numerical discretizations are used. While RANS simulations with the baseline SA closure do not show any wing-root separation post𝐶𝐿max, both HRLES and WMLES show onset of corner flow separation with varying degrees of progression, along with a weak pitch break in the wing-contribution of the overall pitching moment. This post-𝐶𝐿max pitch break seen in the free-air simulations is weaker than the break observed in experiments, with a weaker break reported in WMLES for each iteration of grid-refinement. In-tunnel simulations using both SA-baseline RANS and WMLES show a much stronger post-𝐶𝐿max break with the WMLES predictions showing excellent agreement with the experiment in terms of both the flow-topology observed and the pressure-coefficients at various spanwise stations. Sensitivity to the tunnel wall boundary layer is characterized via comparisons between viscous and inviscid treatments for the tunnel walls. WMLES predictions show moderate sensitivity at the predicted inboard flow-state at 𝐶𝐿max along with the progression towards a post-𝐶𝐿max stall; however, this stalled state at 𝛼≈20◦(inside the tunnel) obtained with both tunnel wall treatments appears to be largely identical.

TTT↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Wall Modeled Large Eddy Simulations for NASA’s Jet Noise Consensus Database of Single-Flow, Round, Convergent Jets

A campaign of wall-modeled large-eddy simulations (WMLES) using structured curvilinear overlapping grids has been performed with the Launch Ascent and Vehicle Aerodynamics(LAVA) computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software to predict jet noise for single-stream axisymmetric round jets. The simulations address the new Prediction Uncertainty Reduction(PUR) technical challenge within the context of NASA’s Commercial Supersonic Technology(CST) project. The goal of PUR is to quantify and reduce uncertainties from scale-resolving simulations to assess noise characteristics of next generation quiet supersonic commercial jets during takeoff and landing conditions where the noise from the exhaust jet dominates. The focus of this effort is to generate a simulation database for single-stream axisymmetric round nozzles at several conditions both for static (no ambient co-flow), which is the focus of this article, and in-flight (flight stream co-flow) conditions, which are beyond the current scope. Nine different flow conditions ranging in jet exit Mach number from 0.38 to 1.0 with nozzle temperature ratios (NTR) from 0.84 to 2.7 have been conducted. Details of the structured overset grids, numerical discretization and wall-model are provided. Near-field comparisons to PIV data show great agreement for both velocity and normal stresses, however a systematic TKE overshoot at the nozzle exit is seen in the lip line shear-layer. A permeable Ffowcs Williams Hawkings (FWH) surface, enclosing the jet, is used to predict far-field noise from the simulated flow-field. Comparison of CFD predictions to microphone array measurements demonstrate excellent agreement within the resolved frequency range. A systematic under-prediction of far-aft observer angles larger than 150 degrees has been observed across all simulations. We achieved a cost reduction of an order of magnitude for these WMLES compared to an earlier study of this configuration due to algorithmic and software improvements. The accuracy of the results and short turnaround time demonstrate that WMLES within the LAVA framework is a cost-effective approach for jet noise predictions that could soon be incorporated into the design cycle of jet noise reduction technologies.

CST↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Perspective for the High Lift Common Research Model Using the LAVA Framework

An in-depth assessment of the High Lift-Common Research Model (HL-CRM) aerodynamic performance is made using a Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) methodology. Results presented here were produced in support of the 4th AIAA High Lift Prediction Workshop(HLPW-4), with additional simulation results and analysis used to support findings from the workshop. Mesh resolution, RANS closure models, and tunnel effects were among the sources of simulation sensitivity addressed, all in the pursuit of evaluating best-practice simulation methods for complex high-lift configurations. In general, free-air simulations using RANS yield accurate predictions of integrated loads in the pre-stall regime for the HL-CRM, while strong sensitivity to simulation method is observed near CLmax. Additionally, a study assessing changes in aerodynamic performance due to flap deflection angle indicated strong sensitivity to turbulence model closure and mesh resolution, particularly at the highest deflection setting. Several available corrections for the Spalart-Allmaras (SA) turbulence model were tested and generally introduced more error relative to the experiment in comparison to the baseline SA closure model. The Standard Menter Baseline Two-Equation (k-ωBSL) turbulence model was also explored, which arguably yielded results highly consistent with experiment, but at a substantially higher computational cost. Therefore, as a compromise between computational cost and accuracy, the baseline SA closure model was selected for additional HL-CRM studies that assess alternative solution methods. These strategies include “warm start” approaches, which initialize the simulation from a previously converged solution at a nearby angle of attack, unsteady calculations, and simulations that model the experimental wind tunnel. Results from these studies would reinforce the shortcomings of RANS in predicting aircraft performance at high-lift conditions, namely at high-αand highly loaded flap conditions, while also answering questions about appropriate modeling techniques to minimize the errors associated with RANS where possible

TTT↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A Hybrid RANS-LES Perspective for the High Lift Common Research Model Using LAVA

An assessment of a Hybrid RANS/LES (HRLES) approach for𝐶𝐿,max prediction is presented for the NASA High-Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL). Both the free air and the wind tunnel configuration of the CRM-HL are investigated and the results are compared to the QinetiQ wind tunnel experiments and to two other numerical approaches: Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) and Wall-Modeled Large Eddy Simulations (WMLES). For the free-air configuration, HRLES was shown to address some of the known shortcomings in RANS methods and prevent inboard and outboard flow separation particularly in the region of𝐶𝐿,max and post-stall. To achieve these improvements over RANS, LES-appropriate grids and numerical discretizations are required. HRLES predicts a weak pitch break at the highest angle-of-attack due to onset of wing-root corner flow separation whereas the free-air corrected experiment values indicate an occurrence of a much stronger pitch break. The improvements of HRLES over a URANS approach has been objectively shown by computing a set of solutions with the same grid, same numerics and time-step size and comparing the solutions. It was also found that when applying HRLES to a RANS best practice grid and numerics that the HRLES method significantly under performed RANS. For the in tunnel configuration, HRLES showed good agreement with the loads, surface pressure and oil-flow photographs obtained in the experiment. HRLES was able to improve upon the RANS simulations, which showed a sharp loss of lift at the two highest angles-of-attack due to large scale inboard and outboard separation on the wing, by correctly predicting the corner flow separation and showing remarkably close agreement in the flow topologies with the experiment.

TTT↗