Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

John Nowak

Publications and source records attributed to John Nowak.

17 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Comparing the Regional Variability of Emission Factors of Greenhouse Gases Over Different Landscape During FIREX-AQ Campaign

Biomass burning (wildfires, prescribed and agricultural burning) is one of the major sources of trace gases and particulate emissions and annual variability in growth rates. Biomass burning can impact local, regional, and global air quality, as well as climate. Measurements of emissions from biomass burning are crucial to a better understanding of how it influences and interacts with biogeochemical cycles. High resolution in-situ measurements were recorded onboard the NASA DC-8 aircraft during the FIREX-AQ (Fire Influence on Regional to Global Environments and Air Quality) airborne field campaign July-September, 2019, which was conducted over the continental U.S. Fire emission factors (EF) are essential input for emissions models used to develop biomass burning emission inventories. Here we present the Emission Ratio (ER), MCE (Modified Combustion Efficiency), and EF (Emission Factor) of CO2, CO, and CH4, which constitute the majority of carbon emitted from the wildland, prescribed, and agricultural fires. EFCO2, EFCO, and EFCH4 from the Wildland fires at Williams Flats, WA (primarily Douglas Fir, Ponderosa pine, wheatgrass: 50-75%), ranged from 1527 – 1820 g/kg (Avg. 1641±42), 6.5 – 174.1 g/kg (110.5±24.1), and 0.7 – 11.3 g/kg (6.2±1.9), respectively. EFs from the Arizona CASTLE fire, with somewhat different fuel sources (primarily Ponderosa pine, Douglas fir: 40-70%) ranged from 1266 – 1667 g/kg (1596±59), 99.5 – 344.5 g/kg (136.7±36.8), and 0.4 – 9.2 g/kg (7.2±1.7), respectively. Another primary driver of EFs is likely fire weather. Detailed variability of greenhouse gas EFs will be examined and presented in accordance with different fuels and fire conditions at burned areas, specifically within unique wildland and croplands, using the FCCS (Fuel Characteristic Classification System) 30m land cover identification and the Cropland Data Layer (CDL).

Biomass burning↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Comparing the regional variability of emission factors of greenhouse gases over different landscape during FIREX-AQ campaign

Biomass burning (wildfires, prescribed and agricultural burning) is one of the major sources of trace gases and particulate emissions and annual variability in growth rates. Biomass burning can impact local, regional, and global air quality, as well as climate. Measurements of emissions from biomass burning are crucial to a better understanding of how it influences and interacts with biogeochemical cycles. High resolution in-situ measurements were recorded onboard the NASA DC-8 aircraft during the FIREX-AQ (Fire Influence on Regional to Global Environments and Air Quality) airborne field campaign July-September, 2019, which was conducted over the continental U.S. Fire emission factors (EF) are essential input for emissions models used to develop biomass burning emission inventories. Here we present the Emission Ratio (ER), MCE (Modified Combustion Efficiency), and EF (Emission Factor) of CO2, CO, and CH4, which constitute the majority of carbon emitted from the wildland, prescribed, and agricultural fires. EFCO2, EFCO, and EFCH4 from the Wildland fires at Williams Flats, WA (primarily Douglas Fir, Ponderosa pine, wheatgrass: 50-75%), ranged from 1527 – 1820 g/kg (Avg. 1641±42), 6.5 – 174.1 g/kg (110.5±24.1), and 0.7 – 11.3 g/kg (6.2±1.9), respectively. EFs from the Arizona CASTLE fire, with somewhat different fuel sources (primarily Ponderosa pine, Douglas fir: 40-70%) ranged from 1266 – 1667 g/kg (1596±59), 99.5 – 344.5 g/kg (136.7±36.8), and 0.4 – 9.2 g/kg (7.2±1.7), respectively. Another primary driver of EFs is likely fire weather. Detailed variability of greenhouse gas EFs will be examined and presented in accordance with different fuels and fire conditions at burned areas, specifically within unique wildland and croplands, using the FCCS (Fuel Characteristic Classification System) 30m land cover identification and the Cropland Data Layer (CDL).

Biomass burning↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Observation of Trace Gases Seasonal Variability in the Marine Boundary Layer over the Atlantic Ocean during the ACTIVATE Field Campaign

High resolution in-situ measurements of carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and water vapor (H2O) were made onboard the NASA HU-25 aircraft during the ACTIVATE (Aerosol Cloud meteorology Interactions oVer the western Atlantic Experiment) campaign during 2020 and 2021 in different seasons (winter through summer) over the mid-latitude western Atlantic Ocean. As most of the flights focused on the marine boundary layer (MBL) during the campaign, these trace gas observations are an excellent data set to examine seasonal variability of trace gas background values in the MBL without the influence of localized point sources. We will describe the variability of these trace gases in the MBL background by filtering out concentrated point sources using back trajectory analysis along with trace gas ratios. Additionally, the ocean is a significant sink of anthropogenic CO2 capturing about one quarter of total anthropogenic carbon. By looking at the MBL CO2 variation as a function of season, we discuss observed changes in CO2 uptake over the ocean. These high accuracy observations of trace gas backgrounds in the MBL along with characterizing seasonal effects on oceanic sequestering of anthropogenic CO2 will improve the understanding of seasonal variations and change in climate and inverse modelling over the ocean.

Yonghoon Choi↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Exploring the Continuum of Stratiform and Cumulus Cloudiness: Observational Insights Related to Marine Boundary Layer Clouds

Low-level marine clouds take on a wide range of morphological states owing to external forcing and internal feedbacks. Rarely are shallow marine clouds adequately described by a single simplified framework but instead exhibit features that partially conform to several states that could be considered “limiting”. Perhaps the most apparent dichotomy is whether to consider shallow clouds as existing within a surface-driven mixed layer or as convective “plume” elements positioned on top. Do the rules that govern the limiting cases transition smoothly through the hybrid scenarios found in nature, or are there particular regions of attraction or repulsion?We have identified 3 ”axes” along which to investigate how the energetics, thermodynamics and cloud macro structure relate to the intermediate spaces between idealizations.

Ewan Crosbie↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

The Use of Atmospheric Composition Variable Standard Names in Airborne and Field Data Products

The number of variables measured during airborne field campaigns has increased more than tenfold over the last thirty years. With this increase in measurements, the complexity for distributed active archive centers (DAACs) to distribute the data and for data users to search for and find measurements of interest has also increased. Part of this complexity arises from the unique variable names in suborbital atmospheric composition field studies. With limited guidelines related to variable naming, variable names and structures can vary significantly, even for the same type of variable. It is common for instrument scientists to use their intended measurable quantity as the data variable name. This can make it difficult for users to locate and interact with a particular variable across multiple data sets. One effective solution to this problem, identified by the Earth Science Data System (ESDS) ICARTT Refresh Working Group [1], was to introduce variable standard names that can be used as tags for each data variable. This allows similar measurements (e.g., dew point) to be categorized and located across field campaigns, regardless of what variable name the instrument scientist has used. From this the atmospheric composition variable standard names were developed with the goal to use Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) principles [2] and provide context for all users, while remaining connected to those in the subject area. These standard names have been successfully implemented in FIREX-AQ, CAMP 2EX, ACTIVATE, and DCOTSS field campaigns.

metadata↗