Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

John W Slater

Publications and source records attributed to John W Slater.

9 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2024

SUPIN: A Tool for the Aerodynamic Design and Analysis of Supersonic Inlets

The Supersonic Inlet Design and Analysis Tool (SUPIN) is a computational program that performs geometric modeling and aerodynamic design and analysis of a set of supersonic inlets whose types include the axisymmetric pitot, three-dimensional pitot, axisymmetric, two-dimensional, two-dimensional bifurcated-duct, and streamline-traced inlets. The inlets are modeled by dividing the inlet flowpath into components that start at the freestream and ends at the engine face. The primary components of the inlet include the external supersonic diffuser, throat section, and subsonic diffuser. Each component is characterized by a set of inputs that include geometric and aerodynamic factors. Examples of the geometric factors are angles, lengths, area ratios, and coordinates that describe the geometry of the components. Examples of the aerodynamic factors are Mach numbers, flow ratios, and pressure ratios that set constraints or desired aerodynamic properties of the component. These input factors are specified within a text-based input data file that is read into SUPIN. SUPIN is a Fortran 95 program that performs the inlet design and analysis as a batch or non-interactive process. SUPIN writes output data files describing the inlet geometry and aerodynamic performance. SUPIN uses analytic, empirical, and numerical methods to perform the inlet design and analysis. The inlet geometry is constructed using planar and three-dimensional geometry constructs and is represented by coordinates, angles, areas, profiles, and surfaces. Surfaces are output in the form of a Plot3D surface grid file. SUPIN does have some capability to automatically generate planar and three-dimensional, multi-block, structured grids for computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis. The aerodynamic analysis performed by SUPIN computes quasi-one-dimensional properties, such as Mach numbers, pressures, and temperatures, through the inlet flowpath. Planar aerodynamic properties, such as those for shock and Mach waves, are computed for the supersonic compression of the external supersonic diffuser and throat section. The inlet performance is characterized by the inlet flow rates, total pressure recovery, and inlet drag. The primary intent of this document is to describe the usage of SUPIN. The methods used within SUPIN are documented and may serve as a useful reference for understanding the aerodynamic design and analysis of supersonic inlets.

supersonic inlets↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Auxiliary Inlet Design Study for Mach 1.4

Auxiliary inlet configurations were developed for inlets designed for a NASA Mach 1.4 Supersonic Technology Concept Aeroplane (STCA). The inlets included axisymmetric pitot and axisymmetric spike inlets. The auxiliary inlets were full circumferential slots within the cowl. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were performed to obtain inlet performance metrics of total pressure recovery and radial distortion at the engine face for take-off and approach conditions. Methods of design of experiments were used to explore the statistical significance of the design factors for the auxiliary inlets which included the axial location, length of the opening, and auxiliary inlet angle. The results demonstrate the effect of the design factors and show the potential for improved inlet performance with the use of auxiliary inlets.

supersonic inlets↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Some Design Considerations for Two-Dimensional, Mixed-Compression Inlets for Mach 2.5 to 3.5.

A computational design study was performed to explore design factors for two-dimensional, mixed-compression inlets designed for cruise conditions at Mach 2.5, 2.75, 3.0, 3.25, and 3.5 and their influence on the aerodynamic performance of the inlets. The design factors included the split of external and internal compression, capture aspect ratio, throat section and subsonic diffuser geometry, and location and rates of porous bleed regions. The performance of the inlet was measured by the total pressure recovery, cowl wave drag, bleed flow rates, and total pressure distortion at the engine face. The results provide useful information for the design of inlets for future supersonic aircraft.

Supersonic Inlet↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Streamline-Traced, External-Compression Supersonic Inlets for Mach 2

A computational study was performed to explore the aerodynamic design and performance of streamline-traced, external-compression (STEX) inlets for Mach 2.0. The performance metrics included inlet flow rates, total pressure recovery, and total pressure distortion. The study explored the use of round and flattened capture cross-sections and a bleed slot. The design of the inlet and generation of the inlet geometry was performed using the Supersonic Inlet Design and Analysis(SUPIN) Tool. Computational grids were generated, and methods of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) were applied to solve the three-dimensional, turbulent flow through the inlets using the Wind-US CFD flow solver. It was found that the use of a bleed slot with about 5% bleed resulted in an inlet total pressure recovery of 95% at Mach 2 with acceptable radial and circumferential total pressure distortion. It was also found that there was only a slight decrease in performance between a round and flattened capture cross-section. This suggests that the use of streamline tracing offers flexibility in shaping the inlet capture cross-section for a more favorable integration with an aircraft wing or fuselage. This flexibility and the good performance of the inlet provides a novel inlet design for future commercial supersonic aircraft.

Computational Fluid Dynamics↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Streamline‐Traced, External‐Compression Supersonic Inlets for Mach 2

A computational study was performed to explore the aerodynamic design and performance of streamline-traced, external‐compression (STEX) inlets for Mach 2.0. The performance metrics included inlet flow rates, total pressure recovery, and total pressure distortion. The study explored the use of round and flattened capture cross‐sections and a bleed slot. The design of the inlet and generation of the inlet geometry was performed using the Supersonic Inlet Design and Analysis (SUPIN) Tool. Computational grids were generated, and methods of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) were applied to solve the three dimensional, turbulent flow through the inlets using the Wind‐US CFD flow solver. It was found that the use of a bleed slot with about 5% bleed resulted in an inlet total pressure recovery of 95% at Mach 2 with acceptable radial and circumferential total pressure distortion. It was also found that there was only a slight decrease in performance between a round and flattened capture cross‐section. This suggests that the use of streamline tracing offers flexibility in shaping the inlet capture cross‐section for a more favorable integration with an aircraft wing or fuselage. This flexibility and the good performance of the inlet provides a novel inlet design for future commercial supersonic aircraft.

Computational Fluid Dynamics↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Supersonic External-Compression Inlets for Mach 1.4 to 2.0

A series of supersonic, external-compression inlets were designed for freestream Mach numbers of Mach 1.4, 1.7, and 2.0. The types of inlets included axisymmetric pitot, axisymmetric spike, two-dimensional, two-dimensional bifurcated, and streamline-traced inlets. The inlets were designed as isolated from an aircraft with freestream conditions, engine-face geometry, and flow rates established from a reference NASA commercial aircraft concept. The inlets were designed using the NASA Supersonic Inlet Design and Analysis (SUPIN) Tool and the inlet performance was obtained from computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. The study compares the physical dimensions and aerodynamic performance of the inlets to provide reference information for the selection of inlet types for commercial supersonic aircraft.

Supersonics↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Wind-US Simulations of the NASA 1507 Inlet Test Case

Steady-state, Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were performed of the NASA 1507 Inlet Test Case from the 6th AIAA Propulsion Aerodynamics Workshop (PAW) held in January 2023 using the Wind-US CFD solver. The simulations were performed with bleed regions modeled as surface patches and the Slater bleed boundary condition models were applied within those regions. Both the constant-plenum-pressure and the fixed-plenum-exit bleed models where applied. The vortex generators were modeled using the Bender-Anderson-Yagle (BAY) vortex generator model. The CFD simulations were performed for inlet engine-face flow ratios varying from supercritical to subcritical inlet operation until inlet unstart. The results of the CFD simulations were compared to wind-tunnel data which included boundary layer profiles, axial static pressure distributions, bleed rates, total pressure recovery performance curves, and engine-face total pressure rake profiles. The CFD simulations were able to match most of the boundary layer rake data near the geometric throat, but the boundary layers on the centerbody were thinner than indicated by the wind-tunnel data. For the supercritical CFD simulations, the engine-face flow ratio was at least 2% to 2.5% lower than indicated by the wind-tunnel data, but still consistent with the level of supercritical bleed. The engine-face flow rates of the wind-tunnel tests had an uncertainty of ±2% which could explain the differences. The supercritical engine-face flow rates of the wind-tunnel data indicated a 5% supercritical bleed rate rather than the reported 7.18% bleed rate. The CFD simulations were able to calculate the maximum total pressure recovery of pt2/pt = 0.907 as observed for the wind-tunnel data. The CFD simulations with the constant-pressure bleed model were able to obtain a much lower engine-face total pressure ratio than indicated by both the wind-tunnel data and the CFD simulations using a fixed-plenum-exit bleed model. The CFD simulations indicated a sharp static pressure rise for the terminal shock rather than a more gradual rise indicated by the wind-tunnel data. The CFD simulations were not able to accurately compute the total pressure variation across the engine-face total pressure rake.

Supersonics↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Off-Design Analysis of Axisymmetric External-Compression Supersonic Inlets for Mach 1.4 to 2.0

Supersonic axisymmetric, external-compression inlets designed for freestream Mach numbers of Mach 1.4, 1.7, and 2.0 were evaluated to characterize their off-design performance. The inlets were characterized as isolated from the airframe with freestream conditions, engine-face geometry, and flow rates established from a reference NASA commercial aircraft concept. The off-design performance was characterized using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. The study characterized the off-design performance at the cruise condition for variations in the inlet flow rate, angle-of-attack, and freestream Mach number. Also characterized was the inlet performance at take-off and approach-to-landing conditions for which the use of auxiliary intakes was included. The inlet performance was characterized by the flow rates, total pressure recovery and distortion, and drag. An understanding of the off-design performance of the axisymmetric inlets provides information for the selection of inlets for commercial supersonic aircraft.

Supersonic Inlets↗