Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Johnson, Emily Michelle

Publications and source records attributed to Johnson, Emily Michelle.

3 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2022

Shock wave formation from head-on collision of two subsonic vortex rings

Vortex ring collisions have attracted intense interest in both water and air studies (Baird in Proc R Soc Lond Ser Math Phys Sci 409:59–65, 1987, Poudel et al. in Phys Fluids 33:096105, 2021, Lim and Nickels in Nature 357:225, 1992, New et al. in Exp Fluids 57:109, 2016, Suzuki et al. in Geophys Res Lett 34, 2007, Yan et al. in J Fluids Eng 140:054502, 2018, New et al. in J Fluid Mech 899, 2020, Cheng et al. in Phys Fluids 31:067107, 2019, Hernández and Reyes in 29:103604, 2017, Mishra et al. in Phys Rev Fluids, 2021, Zednikova et al. in Chem Eng Technol 42:843–850, 2019, Kwon et al. in Nature 600:64–69, 2021). These toroidal structures spin around a central axis and travel in the original direction of impulse while spinning around the core until inertial forces become predominant causing the vortex flow to spontaneously decay to turbulence (Vortex Rings, https://projects.iq.harvard.edu/smrlab/vortex-rings). Previous studies have shown the collision of subsonic vortex rings resulting in reconnected vortex rings, but the production of a shock wave from the collision has not been demonstrated visibly (Lim and Nickels in Nature 357:225, 1992, Cheng et al. in Phys Fluids 31:067107, 2019). Here we present the formation of a shock wave due to the collision of explosively formed subsonic vortex rings. As the vortex rings travel at Mach 0.66 toward the collision point, they begin to trap high pressure air between them. Upon collision, high pressure air was imploded and released radially away from the axis of the collision, generating a visible shock wave traveling through and away from the colliding vortices at Mach 1.22. Our results demonstrate a pressure gradient with high pressure release creating a shock wave. We anticipate our study to be a starting point for more explosively formed vortex collisions. For example, explosives with different velocities of detonation could be tested to produce vortex rings of varying velocities.

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2020

Cylinder Test

In 1941 G.I. Taylor proposed the cylinder test as an experiment to determine the properties of explosive products. The test consists of a hollow metal cylinder containing an unreacted cylindrical charge of explosives. The charge is detonated at one end of the cylinder and, as the detonation wave propagates, the product gas expands behind it. As the product gas is produced, the pressure acting on the metal increases and begins to push the walls outward. Consider the time at which the detonation wave has reached the halfway point between the two ends of the cylinder. In front of the wave nothing has changed and the metal tube has the same initial radius. Behind the wave, the radius of the tube has expanded. The farther behind the wave a section of tube is, the larger its radius has become. The longer the wall is exposed to the pressurized gas, the more it expands, so that the radius is largest where the detonation was initiated. The metal most commonly used for this experiment is soft copper. Its material properties are well known and soft copper is also easy to shape with precision machining. During the cylinder test the radial expansion of the cylinder is measured over time and this data is used to determine the amount of work applied to the cylinder wall by the product gas as a function of time. Since volume increases in this problem, the time dependence can be seen as a volume dependence. The volume dependent work yields a path in thermodynamic space. The cylinder test experiment can be modeled using simulation. The simulation gives you the answer, but it cannot tell you why. The goal of the proposed work is to use analytic analysis methods to give insight into the simulation solution.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗