Jonathan Sasson | Search NASA

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Summary of Shock Wave Turbulent Boundary Layer Interaction Experiments In a Circular Test Section

A series of experiments were performed at Mach 2.5 in a 17 cm diameter circular test section to characterize an impinging/reflected shock wave turbulent boundary layer interaction generated by a cone-cylinder centerbody. The cone-cylinder centerbody generates a conical shock wave that interacts with the naturally occurring boundary layer developing on the test section wall. Three different cone angles were used in the experiment to study unseparated, incipiently separated, and separated interactions. When the cone-cylinder centerbody is positioned on the centerline, a flowfield which is two-dimensional in the mean is generated. Three dimensional interactions were also created by offsetting the cone-cylinder centerbody from the test section centerline. The results are intended to provide benchmark quality datasets for computational fluid dynamics (CFD) validation without the pitfalls inherent in rectangular configurations where corner effects prohibit a truly two-dimensional flow in the mean. The experimental measurements included surface flow visualization, wall static pressure, flowfield Pitot tube pressure, constant-voltage anemometry (CVA) normal hot-wire, and particle image velocimetry (PIV) measurements. The hot-wire measurements were used to calculate mean mass flux and total temperature profiles, mass flux and total temperature turbulence intensities, and the mass flux-total temperature correlation. The PIV measurements provide three-dimensional mean velocity measurements. Agreement between the pressure, hot-wire, and PIV measurements is established in the undisturbed upstream flowfield.

Supersonic↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Summary of Shock Wave Turbulent Boundary Layer Interaction Experiments in a Circular Test Section

A series of experiments were performed at Mach 2.5 in a 17 cm diameter circular test section to characterize an impinging/reflected shock wave turbulent boundary layer interaction generated by a cone-cylinder centerbody. The cone-cylinder centerbody generates a conical shock wave that interacts with the naturally occurring boundary layer developing on the test section wall. Three different cone angles were used in the experiment to study unseparated, incipiently separated, and separated interactions. When the cone-cylinder centerbody is positioned on the centerline, a flowfield which is two-dimensional in the mean is generated. Three dimensional interactions were also created by offsetting the cone-cylinder centerbody from the test section centerline. The results are intended to provide benchmark quality datasets for computational fluid dynamics (CFD) validation without the pitfalls inherent in rectangular configurations where corner effects prohibit a truly two-dimensional flow in the mean. The experimental measurements included surface flow visualization, wall static pressure, flowfield Pitot tube pressure, constant-voltage anemometry (CVA) normal hot-wire, and particle image velocimetry (PIV) measurements. The hot-wire measurements were used to calculate mean mass flux and total temperature profiles, mass flux and total temperature turbulence intensities, and the mass flux-total temperature correlation. The PIV measurements provide three-dimensional mean velocity measurements. Agreement between the pressure, hot-wire, and PIV measurements is established in the undisturbed upstream flowfield.

compressible flow↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Cross-Measurement Comparisons for a CFD Validation Dataset on Mach 2.5 Axisymmetric Turbulent Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interactions

Experimental data for a shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction has been collected using multiple measurement techniques. Unfortunately, diversity of methods for acquisition begets an aggregation of data which does not directly quantify the same properties of the flowfield. The objective in this paper was to (a) present the collection of flowfield measurements in one venue in a format more usable for those validating CFD models against the data, (b) evaluate the degree to which the experimental data support each other, and (c) highlight the differences and relative advantages/shortcomings of each measurement techniques. To present the various measured quantities into common format, CFD results from a companion paper also submitted for presentation at this meeting are utilized. For the case where the boundary layer remains attached, there is agreement between the various measurements as well as with Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulation solutions. As the impinging shock strength is increased beyond the point of separating the boundary layer, the congruity of the data wanes. Generally, agreement among the measurements exceeds the degree to which the CFD solutions agree with experiments. This suggests that unmodeled physical phenomena, such as transient motion of the reflected shock and separation bubble, give rise to the discrepancies observed in the computational results.

Shock-wave Boundary-layer interaction↗