Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Joseph M. Derlaga

Publications and source records attributed to Joseph M. Derlaga.

6 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2024

Intrastep, Stage-Value Predictors for Diagonally-Implicit Runge-Kutta Methods

To better identify the necessary attributes of good stage-value predictors (SVPs), numerous SVPs are designed for an existing: ESDIRK4(3)7L[2]SA [26] and a new: ESDIRK4(3)8L[2]SA scheme.1 Both are stifflyaccurate, stage-order two, explicit, singly-diagonally implicit Runge–Kutta (ESDIRK) schemes. Tradeoffs are studied in the parameter spaces enforcing the constraints on accuracy, linear stability, nonlinear stability and coefficient size to determine which objectives correlate with effective predictors. The SVPs are tested on three challenging external aerodynamics problems [107 − 108 degrees of freedom (DoFs)], each with a different level of stiffness. The problems include two 3D airfoils simulations and one canonical turbulence simulation. All simulations use the compressible Navier-Stokes equations (CNSE). An entropy stable spectral collocation formulation is used for discretizing the spatial terms in the equations. Simulations are performed at a wide variety of temporal error tolerances. Problems that are sufficiently stiff (e.g., lax temporal error tolerances) benefit from SVPs designed with second-order accuracy and stability properties: A-stability, and L-stability, rather than high accuracy constraints. Simulations with modest stiffness (e.g., strict error tolerances) are better suited for SVPs designed using high accuracy constraints. Designing SVPs with enhanced stability properties is tedious but worthwhile. Simulation times are reduced with optimal SVPs by as much as 100% on some stages, with combined stepwise improvements of between 50 − 100% for both methods. A comparative study is performed with the two aforementioned methods as well as four other ESDIRKs. The newly designed ESDIRK4(3)8L[2]SA with γ ≈ 1/10, proves to be the most efficient of the six tested ESDIRK schemes simulating the CNSE.

Diagonally-Implicit Runge-Kutta↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Verification Test Suite for Spalart-Allmaras QCR2000 Turbulence Model

The paper presents three benchmark cases for verification of Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes solvers. The verification studies focus on a one-equation Spalart-Allmaras model, SA-[neg]-QCR2000, that uses a version of quadratic constitutive relations.The benchmark cases are a two-dimensional subsonic flow around a Joukowski airfoil, a three-dimensional supersonic flow through a square duct, and a three-dimensional flow over a wing-fuselage configuration. The turbulence-model formulation, geometry, flow conditions, grids, and the expected output are described in detail. Reference solutions computed by several established codes are shown

Computational Aerodynamics↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

GPU Implementation of the OVERFLOW CFD Code

The high-performance computing (HPC) landscape is quickly changing to systems where most of the performance comes from specialized chips, specifically graphics processing units (GPUs). Such GPU systems are throughput machines, where efficient use of the GPU often requires code refactoring to expose a few orders of magnitude more fine grain parallelism than was previously used on the CPU. Recent modifications to OVERFLOW, an overset, structured grid, computational fluid dynamics flow solver, written in Fortran will be presented. These modifications include both code modernization efforts and algorithmic changes to enable OVERFLOW to efficiently utilize GPUs. Many of these algorithmic changes would likely also be applicable for other structured grid, stencil-based codes wanting to utilize GPUs. The capabilities that have been ported to run on the GPUs are presented, along with the performance gains of the GPU version relative the CPU version of OVERFLOW.

GPU Programming↗