Engineering topics

Justin M. Pesich

Publications and source records attributed to Justin M. Pesich.

2 records

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Multiphysics Computational Analysis of a Perforated Plate Cooling Flow

A multiphysics analysis of a film cooling flow was conducted using a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solver in conjunction with a conjugate heat transfer (CHT) solver. The film cooling problem consisted of a square nozzle producing a heated subsonic jet over a perforated plate with three sections of 45 cooling holes each. Results from the multiphysics analysis were compared to a CFD-only approach and experimental results. Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) computations were employed first, with and without the CHT solver. The multiphysics approach provided much closer agreement with experimentally measured plate temperatures than the CFD-only approach. Comparisons of computed velocities and temperatures were also made with experimental data. Hybrid RANS-large eddy simulation calculations employing the Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation (DDES) approach were also conducted within the multiphysics framework. The DDES approach was unable to resolve turbulent structures in the near wall regions. Hence, the RANS part of the DDES model was used in near wall regions, and produced surface temperatures along with velocity and temperature profiles close to the wall that were very similar to the RANS results. The DDES approach did resolve structures in the outer portion of the boundary layer especially near the end of the plate where the boundary layer was thicker. The key result was the improved surface temperatures produced by the multiphysics approach employing CHT over the fluid-only approach.

Computational Fluid Dynamics↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Liquid Hydrogen Tank Chill and No-Vent Fill Prediction using Computational Fluid Dynamics

Cryogenic tank chill and fill is an important cryogenic fluid management (CFM) technology that supports and enables many of NASA’s long-duration space missions. For no-vent fill, the receiver tank pressure remains below the supply tank pressure during the entire duration of the fill so that the tank does not require venting. This is especially advantageous for tank fill operations in low gravity where the position of the liquid is not always known and venting the tank may cause loss of propellant by venting liquid. In lieu of expensive tests conducted on-orbit, accurate computational models capable of predicting receiver tank pressure during cryogenic propellant tank fill may be used to reduce system and propellant mass as well as mission risk. However, these numerical models must be validated or anchored to test data. This study presents a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model with conjugate heat transfer that is used to predict a liquid hydrogen tank chill and no-vent fill ground test conducted at Lewis Research Center (now Glenn Research Center) in 1991. The specific test case chosen for model validation implemented an upward-facing jet near the bottom of a cylindrical 34 liter tank. CFD predictions are compared to experimental measurements of tank pressure, fill level, fluid temperatures, and wall temperatures. The CFD results show reasonable agreement to the test data but overpredict the pressure collapse near the end of the fill despite the liquid jet penetrating the liquid-vapor interface. Several sensitivity studies are considered due to notable uncertainties in the experiment.

Computational Fluid Dynamics↗