Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

K E Vander Kaaden

Publications and source records attributed to K E Vander Kaaden.

8 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2024

Investigating Sulfur-Rich Mercury Analogs Exposed to Simulated Micrometeoroid Bombardment in the Laboratory

Space weathering (SW) continually alters the spectral, microstructural, and chemical characteristics of the surface of airless bodies across the solar system. The effects of SW vary depending on the heliocentric distance and the initial composition of the target surface. While SW on the Moon and S-type asteroids is well documented, our understanding of how this process affects Mercury is at an early stage. Mercury’s interplanetary environment is harsh, with the surface of the planet experiencing an intense solar wind flux as well as a higher flux and velocity of micrometeoroid impactors compared to the Moon and S-type asteroids. In addition, Mercury is also a geochemical endmember, with a surface composition low in Fe (<2 wt.%) and enriched in volatile components, such as sulfur (up to 4 wt.% in the low reflectance material (LRM)). These volatile components are thought to play a major role in the formation of hollows via their sublimation. Sulfur has been hypothesized to occur at the surface of Mercury as sulfide minerals (MgS, CaS) based on its correlation with Mg and Ca in remote sensing data. However, recent observations of chaotic terrains in the north polar area of Mercury and of glacier-like features at lower latitudes indicated that octasulfur (S 8 , elemental sulfur) is another likely constituent of a volatile-rich layer in Mercury’s crust. Its behavior on Mercury may result in a complex cycle of enrichment and depletion. While S is often depleted on small body surfaces, Mercury’s gravity could result in ejected S subsequently returning to the surface and coating regolith grains. Further, the reaction of reduced S-rich gas with glasses of a Mercury-like composition also produced S-rich coatings. However, the precise behavior and evolution of S-rich species exposed to the harsh SW on Mercury remains poorly understood and needs to be further investigated in the laboratory. Here, we present the results of our analyses of the spectral, microstructural, and chemical characteristics of S-rich Mercury analogs irradiated by pulsed laser to simulate the short duration, high temperature events associated with micrometeoroid impacts.

N Bott↗
NASA NTRS2023

Temperature Effect on Silicate Melt-Sulfide-Metal Trace Element Partitioning in the Presence of Sulfur Under Reduced Conditions

The reduced nature of Mercury, enstatite chondrites, and the aubrite parent bodies (APB) have raised many questions regarding the geochemical behavior of typically lithophile, heat-producing, and rare-earth elements (REE) in magmas at low oxygen fugacity (fO2). Due to decreasing O availability at these low fO2, and an abundance of S(sup 2(-)), sulfur (S) acts as an important anion that changes the partitioning behavior of many elements and modifies the physical properties of silicate melts. Preliminary observations suggest that major and minor elements exhibit different geochemical affinities in highly reduced, S-rich systems compared to terrestrial rocks. The speciation and bonding environment of S, dictated by P/T/fO2 conditions, may strongly influence the degree to which S affects partitioning behavior. Here we investigate the partitioning behavior of major, minor, and trace elements between silicate melt, sulfide melt, and metal as well as the coordination chemistry of S in highly reduced silicate melts. Our work is focused on investigating solely the entropy-dependent temperature effect on partitioning of elements for which we currently have MESSENGER data (K, Na, Th, U, Si, Mg, Fe, Ti, Ca, Al, Cr, Mn, S, Cl) as well as a host of geochemically relevant trace elements such as REEs (P, Co, Ni, Mo, Ce, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Dy, Yb). Previous studies in which temperature, pressure, and fO2 were co-varied found that as fO2 decreases, heat-producing elements U and Th become more chalcophile, while K becomes less chalcophile. Concurrently, nominally lithophile elements Mg and Ca become more chalcophile and were observed as minor elements in exsolved sulfides and bonded with S species in silicate melt. These studies, however, could not disentangle entropic effects from changes in the fO2. New temperature-dependent partitioning data from our work will be used to determine which elements are most likely to retain their lithophile character and hence be incorporated into silicates, and which elements are likely contained within the sulfide (chalcophile) and metal core (siderophile), setting the stage for the thermal and magmatic evolution of reduced planetary bodies.

B A Anzures↗
NASA NTRS2021

Understanding the Space Weathering of Mercury Through Laboratory Experiments

Introduction: Airless surfaces across the solar system are continually modified by energetic particles from solar wind and micrometeoroid bombardment [1,2]. This process is known as space weathering, and it alters the chemical, microstructural, and optical properties of surface regoliths on airless bodies, including Mercury. On the Moon and S-type asteroids, the reflectance spectral signatures of space weathering include reddening (increasing reflectance with increasing wavelength), darkening (lowering of reflectance), and the attenuation of characteristic absorption bands [2]. Such spectral changes are driven by the production of Fe-bearing nanoparticles(npFe) through both solar wind irradiation and micrometeoroid bombardment. While our understanding of space weathering for the Moon and near-Earth S-types asteroids is advanced, insight into how these processes operate on other planetary bodies is limited. In particular, Mercury experiences a uniquely intense space weathering environment than planetary counterparts at 1 AU, including a moreintense solar wind flux and higher velocity micrometeoroid impacts [4]. Additionally, Mercury has a surface composition unique in the inner solar system, including regions of the surface with very low albedo known as the low reflectance material (LRM), which is enriched in carbon, likely graphite, up to 4wt.% [5].In addition, the concentration of Fe across Mercury’s surface islow (<2 wt.%) compared to the Moonor S-type asteroids asteroids[6]. Our understanding of the effects of space weathering on C-rich and Fe-poor phases is limited. Since Fe plays a critical role inthe development of space weathering characteristicson other airless surfaces(e.g., npFe), its limited availability may significantly affect the development of space weathering features in Mercury surface materials. We can simulate space weathering processes in the laboratory to explore their effects on the microstructural, chemical, and spectral characteristics of Mercury surface materials[7]. Here we used pulsed laser irradiation to simulate the short duration, high-temperature events associated with micrometeoroid impacts. We performed coordinated analyses including reflectance spectroscopy and electron microscopy to investigate the spectral, chemical, and microstructural changes in these mercurian analog samples. Methods: For these experiments, we usedforsteritic olivine with varying FeOcontents, a mineral phase proposed to be abundant on the surface of Mercury. We mixed each sample with graphite to simulate LRM regions of the surface. Wesynthesized the olivinesamplesat 1-bar at NASA’s Johnson Space Centerand prepared pressed powder pellets for laser irradiation [8].We prepared three samples, each with a base layer of olivineto maintain structural integrity and topped witha surface layer containing the graphite-olivine mixture: 1) Sample SC-001 San Carlos olivine(Fo90.91),2)Sample F-S-002 with0.05 wt.% FeO olivine, and 3) F-T-004 with 0.53 wt.% FeO olivine. Each sample was mixed with 5 wt.% powdered graphite and had grain sizes ranging from 45to 125μm. We irradiated each sample usinga pulsed Nd-YAG laser, (l=1064 nm, ~6 ns pulse duration, energy of 48 mJ/pulse) while undervacuumat Northern Arizona University. The laser was rastered1x and then 5x over the surfaceof each sample to simulate progressive space weathering. We collected in situreflectance spectra from the samples after each laser pulse witha Nicolet IS50 Fourier-Transform Infrared spectrometer (lfrom 0.65-2.5 μm). We used an FEI Nova NanoSEM200scanning electron microscope (SEM) and a Hitachi TM4000 Plus benchtop SEM at Purdue University to image the surface morphology and topography of the samples. We extracted thin sections for analysis in the transmission electron microscope(TEM)using the FEI Helios NanoLab 660 focused ion beam (FIB) SEM at the University of Arizona.We performed analysis of the microstructural and chemical characteristics of the samples using the 200 keV JEOL 2500 scanning TEM at Johnson Space Center. Reflectance Spectroscopy Results:Reflectance spectra for each sample are shown in Fig. 1.SC-001:The spectrum of the unirradiated sample exhibits a weak 1.0 μm absorption feature, associated with Fe2+in the olivine,and low overall reflectance (Fig. 1a). Thereflectance and the depth of the absorption band increases after 1x laser raster but are at their lowest after 5x laser rasters.F-T-004:The unirradiated sample has a blue-sloped spectrum with low reflectance without identifiable absorption features (Fig. 1b). With progressive laser irradiation, the sample reflectance increases and becomes strongly red-sloped.F-S-002:The unirradiated sample exhibits a dark, blue-slopedspectrum. The brightness of the sample increases significantly from <0.2average reflectance over >0.8 reflectance in the most irradiated sampleand thespectral slope also becomesslightly reddened (Fig. 1c). Microstructural and Chemical Analysis: Two primary alteration textures were observed in the samples exposed to simulated space weathering: 1) fluffy C-rich,and 2) vesiculated melt. The fluffy C-rich texture is composed oflow-densitydeposits distributed across the surface of the sample(Fig. 2A). Analysis of a FIB section extracted from a low-density C-rich region in sample SC-001 reveals multiple globule-type deposits, discrete from stacked graphite, likely produced via melting from the laser irradiation [9].The vesiculated melt textureis smooth and uniformly distributed across isolated regions of the sample surface. The vesicles measure up to 100s of nmin diameter. Analysis of a FIB section from this texture was extracted from sample F-T-004 reveals a layer of amorphous melt material, close to 100 nm thick and uniform across the FIB section (Fig. 2B). Isolated regions of this melt layer contain small nanoparticles, <5 nm in diameter. Chemical analysis through energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy reveals the composition of this layer is enriched in Si and depleted in Mg and O compared to the underlying sample. Implications for Space Weathering on Mercury: Previous experiments simulating space weathering of Mercury have showndarkening and reddening of spectra[7,10].However, our use of low-Fe materials and graphite to create a sample set more analogous to the mercurian surface. Our results indicate that sample composition plays a significant and important role in the space weathering of Mercury. In particular, our spectral data demonstrates a strong correlation between spectral slope, Fe content, and simulated space weathering. While the variation in FeO content between samples F-S-002 and F-T-004 is <0.6 wt.%, the spectra deviate from flat to strongly red-sloped(F-T-004). This reddeningmay be linked to the presence of very small nanoparticles observed in the melt textures extracted from sample F-T-004. For the SC-001 sample, the fluffy C-rich textures may be developed by the amalgamation of small graphite particles into these unique morphologies. Such observations indicate that space weathering on Mercury may result in both familiar and new microstructural and chemical characteristics. References: [1]Hapke B. (2001) J. Geophys. Res.-Planet.,106,10039–10073. [2]Pieters C.M. and Noble S.K. (2016) J. Geophys. Res-Planet., 121, 1865–1884. [3] Lucey P.G., and Riner, M.A. (2011) Icarus,212, 451-462.[4]CintalaM.J.(1992)J. Geophys. Res.-Planet.,97,947–973.[5]Klima R.L.et al.(2018)Geophys.Res.Letters, 45, 2945–2953. [6]Nittler L.R., et al. (2011) Science 333, 1847-1850.[7]Sasaki S. and Kurahashi E. (2004) Space weathering on Mercury, Adv.Space Res., 33, 2152-2155.[8] Vander KaadenK.E., et al. (2018) LPSCXLIX, Abstract 1230. [9] McGlaun M.L. et al. (2019) LPSCL, Abstract 2019. [10] TrangD.et al. (2018)LPSCXLIX,Abstract2083

M S Thompson↗
NASA NTRS2021

The Mercury Lander Mission Concept Study: Enabling Transformative Science from the Surface of the Inner-Most Planet

As an end-member of rockyplanet formation, Mercury holds unique clues about the original distribution of elements in the earliest stages of Solar System development,as well as how planets form and evolve in close proximity to their host starsgenerally. This Mercury Lander mission concept enables in situ surface measurements that address several fundamental science questions raised by MESSENGER’s pioneering exploration of Mercury. Such measurements are needed to understand Mercury’s unique mineralogy and geo-chemistry; to characterize the structure of the planet’s proportionally massive core’s structure; to measure the planet’s active and ancient magnetic fields at the surface; to investigate the processes that alter the surface and produce the exosphere; and to provide groundtruth for current and future remote datasets

C M Ernst↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Mercury Lander: A Planetary Mission Concept Study for the 2023–2032 Decadal Survey

Mercury holds unique clues to the distribution of elements at the birth of the solar system and how planets form and evolve in close proximity to their host stars. The Mercury Lander mission concept returns in situ measurements to: understand Mercury’s unique mineralogy and geochemistry; characterize the massive core’s structure; measure the planet’s active and ancient magnetic fields at the surface; investigate the processes that alter the surface and produce the exosphere; and provide groundtruth for remote datasets. The mission concept achieves one Mercury year (~88 Earth days) of surface operations with an 11-instrument, high-heritage payload delivered to a landing site within Mercury’s widely distributed low-reflectance material, and addresses science goals encompassing geochemistry, geophysics, the Mercury space environment, and geology. The spacecraft launches on an expendable SpaceX Falcon Heavy in 2035. The four-stage flight system uses a solar-electric propulsion cruise stage to reach Mercury in2045. The orbital stage brings the spacecraft into a thermally safe orbit, then performs orbital maneuvers to prepare for descent. During the orbital phase, a narrow-angle camera acquires images for selecting a low-hazard landing zone within our region of interest. The descent stage begins the braking burn ~120 s before landing. The lander continues to touchdown, using continuous LIDAR operations to support hazard detection and safely deliver the payload to the surface. Landing is at dusk to meet thermal requirements, permitting ~30 hours of sunlight for initial observations. The radioisotope-powered lander continues operations through the Mercury night. Direct-to-Earth communication is possible for the initial three weeks of landed operations, drops out for six weeks, and resumes for the final month. Thermal conditions exceed lander operating temperatures shortly after sunrise, ending operations. A total of ~11 GB of data are returned to Earth. The Phase A–D mission cost estimate (50% unencumbered reserves, excluding launch vehicle) is $1.2 B(FY25$), comparing favorably with past New Frontiers missions and to the cost cap in the New Frontiers4 call(~$1.1B FY25$). This cost estimate shows that a Mercury Lander mission is feasible and compelling as a New Frontiers-class mission in the coming decade.

C M Ernst↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Landing on Mercury: A Geochemical Perspective

The data from the MErcury Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry, and Ranging (MESSENGER) spacecraft have revealed several surprising characteristics about the surface of Mercury, leading to its classification as a geochemical endmember among the terrestrial planets. Some of these features include elevated abundances of up to 3 wt% S, as much as 4 wt% C enrichment in low-reflectance materials (LRM) over the local mean, Na up to 5 wt% at high northern latitudes, and Fe abundances typically lower than 2 wt% [e.g., 1–4]. The S and Fe concentrations have been used to infer that Mercury’s igneous history evolved under highly reduced oxygen fugacity conditions between 2.6 and 7.3 log(sub 10) units below the iron–wüstite buffer [e.g., 5], which is more reducing than any other terrestrial planet in the solar system [e.g., 6]. This highly reduced nature has important con-sequences for the differentiation and thermal/magmatic evolution of Mercury. While the immense amount of data collected by MESSENGER revealed Mercury as a geochemical endmember, this new knowledge raised additional questions that necessitate continued exploration of the planet. Indeed, the joint ESA–JAXA dual-orbiter BepiColombo mission, launched in October 2018, is the most ambitious effort yet attempted to explore Mercury [e.g., 7]. Direct in situ elemental and mineralogical measurements on Mercury’s surface, however, are essential for addressing the new science questions that have arisen since MESSENGER.

K E Vander Kaaden↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

The Importance of Workplace Book Clubs to Start Idea Discussions and Changing Workplace Culture

Many of the ideas presented at this workshop will focus on larger initiatives for addressing IDEA; here we present a more focused effort to start discussions about IDEA, including changing workplace culture – a book club. A book club can be implemented at any size institute, department, or university with minimal resources. While this is not meant to replace any larger initiatives that are desperately needed, this is a way to start discussions within an organization to both change culture, build relationships and camaraderie among the participants, and increase management’s awareness of different direct approaches to addressing diversity and inclusion. It also has the advantage of being detached from the lived day-to-day experience at the organization and therefore provides a more neutral ground to think about and become aware of topics that might raise a plethora of uncomfortable feelings in those discussing them. There are different approaches to implementing a book club depending on the specific goals or needs of an organization – these can include who participates (such as management versus departments or sections versus colleagues outside your organization), the types of books or journal articles chosen, the schedule, and whether it is optional vs. required, among others. Here we discuss some of the approaches we have implemented at our institutions in setting up diversity-focused book clubs, including some lessons learned. We will specifically use a manager’s book club and an employee driven book club (called UnBinding Bias) as two detailed examples. Finally, we end with lessons learned from our experiences.

J Filiberto↗