Search NASASearch

Engineering topics

K S Abdol-Hamid

Publications and source records attributed to K S Abdol-Hamid.

Juncture Flow Computations using kL-Based Turbulence Models

The development and implementation of kL-based Reynolds-Average Navier-Stokes (RANS) two-equation turbulence models are reported in this paper. The kL model is based on Abdol-Hamid's closure and Menter's modification to Rotta's two-equation model. Rotta showed that a reliable transport equation can be formed from the turbulence length scale L, and the turbulence kinetic energy k. Rotta's kL equation is well suited for a term-by-term modeling and displays useful features compared to other scale formulations. One of the important differences is the inclusion of higher-order velocity derivatives in the source terms of the scale equation. This can enhance the ability of RANS solvers to simulate unsteady flows in URANS mode. The k-kL scheme has been modified to include the Algebraic Reynolds Stress Model (ARSM) and the Quadratic Constitutive Relation (QCR) as nonlinear models. These models have gone through extensive validations using two-dimensional benchmark problems. The present study documents the application of the k-kL schemes to simulate flow around the Juncture Flow Model (JFM). The k-kL prediction results show generally good comparisons with measurements. The results from this formulation are similar to, or better than results using the SA-RC-QCR2000 two-equation turbulence model. The ARSM and the QCR formulations of k-kL show promise with a similar level of computational resources as basic two-equation turbulence models.

K S Abdol-Hamid

PAB3D Simulations for the CAWAPI F-16XL

Numerical simulations of the flow around F-16XL are performed as a contribution to the Cranked Arrow Wing Aerodynamic Project International (CAWAPI) using the PAB3D CFD code. Two turbulence models are used in the calculations: a standard k-! model, and the Shih-Zhu-Lumley (SZL) algebraic stress model. Seven flight conditions are simulated for the flow around the F-16XL where the free stream Mach number varies from 0.242 to 0.97. The range of angles of attack varies from 0° to 20°. Computational results, surface static pressure, boundary layer velocity profiles, and skin friction are presented and compared with flight data. Numerical results are generally in good agreement with flight data, considering that only one grid resolution is utilized for the different flight conditions simulated in this study. The ASM results are closer to the flight data than the k-ε model results. The ASM predicted a stronger primary vortex, however, the origin of the vortex and footprint is approximately the same as in the k-ε predictions.

Flight Data