Engineering topics

Kabela, Erik

Publications and source records attributed to Kabela, Erik.

3 records

DOE OSTI2021

Toward the Development of New Parameterizations for Surface Fluxes

For more than 50 years Monin-Obukhov Similarity Theory (MOST) has been used to represent near-surface exchanges of heat, moisture, and momentum in NWP models. However, limitations of MOST are well-known. In brief, MOST assumes a homogenous near-surface flux layer, which is oftentimes not valid, and suffers from autocorrelation. Limitations such as these motivate the need to modify the functional forms of the similarity equations used to represent fluxes in NWP models.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

DOE OSTI2021

Intercomparison of Aerosol Instrumental Responses Using AEROTRAK, SMPS, and APS in a Simulated Building

In this work, three aerosol instruments were intercompared by using data collected from field campaigns in a simulated building environment during the last quarter of 2020 from October to December at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The three aerosol instruments—AeroTrak Model 9110, Scanning Mobility Particle Spectrometer (SMPS) 3080L + 3025A, and Aerodynamic Particle Sizer (APS) 3320—were manufactured by TSI Inc. to perform in situ measurements of particle number concentration in the air. These instruments were co-located in one room in which an aerosol generator was used to produce a defined aerosol population for the instruments to sample and detect in each campaign. The SMPS measured aerosol particles with diameters from 0.01 to 0.7 µm, APS measured aerosol particles with diameters from 0.5 to 20 µm, and AeroTrak measured aerosol particles with diameters from 0.1 to 10 µm. The results suggest that although AeroTrak is fast and easy to use, it does not provide measurements comparable with those obtained by SMPS and APS. The differences in particle counts were orders of magnitude in size (i.e., the AeroTrak data were unreasonably small in the tested scenarios). The results clearly indicate that AeroTrak should not be used in ambient applications in which the level of particle concentration is expected to be high. This would cause difficulty to a campaign in which the dilution factor is unknow a priori. The high particle concentration could also lead to an erroneous aerosol size distribution (e.g., a bimodal size distribution was measured as opposed to a single-mode one). The number concentration limit that AeroTrak is expected to run reliably (i.e., with a counting coincidence error less than ±10%) is approximately three to four per cubic centimeter. This suggests that the instrument is best used in a clean room environment, not in an ambient or indoor application, such as the Flexible Research Platform campaigns.

47 OTHER INSTRUMENTATION↗

DOE OSTI2020

Fireworks on Weather Radar and Camera

High-sensitivity weather radars easily detect nonmeteorological phenomena characterized by weak radar returns. Fireworks are the example presented here. To understand radar observations, an experiment was conducted in which the National Severe Storms Laboratory (NSSL)’s research (3-cm wavelength) dual-polarization radar and a video camera were located at 1 km from fireworks in Norman, Oklahoma. The fireworks from the 4 July 2017 celebration were recorded by both instruments. The experiment is described. Few bursts recorded by the camera are analyzed to obtain the height of the explosion, its maximum diameter, number of stars, and the duration of the visible image. Radar volume scans are examined to characterize the height of the observation, the maximum reflectivity, and its distribution with height. The fireworks location is close to the Terminal Doppler Weather Radar (TDWR) that operates in single polarization at a 5-cm wavelength and monitors hazardous weather over the Oklahoma City airport. A third radar with data from the event is the Weather Surveillance Radar-1988 Doppler (WSR-88D) located in Norman. It has a wavelength of 10 cm and supports technical developments at the Radar Operation Center. Reflectivity factors measured by the three radars are compared to infer the size of dominant scatterers. The polarimetric characteristics of fireworks returns are analyzed. Although these differ from those of precipitation, they are indistinguishable from insect returns. Radar observation of larger fireworks in Fort Worth, Texas, with a WSR-88D is included and compared with the observations of the smaller fireworks in Norman. We expect the detectability of explosions would be similar as of fireworks. Pinpointing locations would be useful to first responders, or air quality forecasters. We note a benefit of fireworks recognition in weather radar data is that it can prevent contamination of precipitation accumulations.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗