Shape sensitivity analysis of flutter response of a laminated wing
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Kapania, Rakesh K.↗
Engineering topics
Kapania, Rakesh K.
Publications and source records attributed to Kapania, Rakesh K..
Sensitivity analysis of a wing aeroelastic response
A variation of Sobieski's Global Sensitivity Equations (GSE) approach is implemented to obtain the sensitivity of the static aeroelastic response of a three-dimensional wing model. The formulation is quite general and accepts any aerodynamics and structural analysis capability. An interface code is written to convert one analysis's output to the other's input, and visa versa. Local sensitivity derivatives are calculated by either analytic methods or finite difference techniques. A program to combine the local sensitivities, such as the sensitivity of the stiffness matrix or the aerodynamic kernel matrix, into global sensitivity derivatives is developed. The aerodynamic analysis package FAST, using a lifting surface theory, and a structural package, ELAPS, implementing Giles' equivalent plate model are used.
Kapania, Rakesh K.↗
A simple element for aeroelastic analysis of undamaged and damaged wings
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Kapania, Rakesh K.↗
Sensitivity analysis of a wing aeroelastic response
The present shape-sensitivity analysis of wing aeroelastic response proceeds from aeroelastic response sensitivities obtained on the basis of the aerodynamic performance valid for high aspect ratio wings in subsonic, subcritical flow. Attention is given to the shape sensitivity of various static aeroelastic responses; the formulation is general, and assumes that, for a given shape and elastic deformation, the aerodynamic analysis will furnish the distribution of the pressure and the pressure sensitivity derivatives with respect to the shape parameters of interest. Wing displacements are obtained by means of an iterative scheme.
Kapania, Rakesh K.↗
Sensitivity of actively damped structures to imperfections and modeling errors
The sensitivity of actively damped response of structures with respect to errors in the structural modeling is studied. Two ways of representing errors are considered. The first approach assumes errors in the form of spatial variations (or imperfections) in the assumed mass and stiffness properties of the structures. The second approach assumes errors due to such factors as unknown joint stiffnesses, discretization errors, and nonlinearities. These errors are represented here as discrepancies between experimental and analytical mode shapes and frequencies. The actively damped system considered here is a direct-rate feedback regulator based on a number of colocated velocity sensors and force actuators. The response of the controlled structure is characterized by the eigenvalues of the closed-loop system. The effects of the modeling errors are thus presented as the sensitivity of the eigenvalues of the closed-loop system. Results are presented for two examples: (1) a three-span simply supported beam controlled by three sensors and actuators, and (2) a laboratory structure consisting of a cruciform beam supported by cables.
Haftka, Raphael T.↗
A simple element for aeroelastic analysis of undamaged and damaged wings
The effects of material damage on the aeroelastic response of an anisotropic composite wing are investigated analytically. The wing is modeled as a Timoshenko beam of arbitrary cross section, applying a 24-DOF one-dimensional beam element and Cartesian coordinates. The formulations for the element stiffness matrix, the strain-displacement relations, the box-beam constitutive relations, the contributions of stringers and web, and the warping correction factor are outlined; the application of strip theory in deriving the aerodynamic model is briefly explained; and numerical results are presented in extensive graphs. It is shown that asymmetry and damage can induce bending-stretching coupling phenomena and thereby affect the stability of the aircraft either positively or negatively. The need to take such effects into account in the design of advanced composite wings is stressed.
Kapania, Rakesh K.↗
Shape sensitivity analysis of flutter response of a laminated wing
A method is presented for calculating the shape sensitivity of a wing aeroelastic response with respect to changes in geometric shape. Yates' modified strip method is used in conjunction with Giles' equivalent plate analysis to predict the flutter speed, frequency, and reduced frequency of the wing. Three methods are used to calculate the sensitivity of the eigenvalue. The first method is purely a finite difference calculation of the eigenvalue derivative directly from the solution of the flutter problem corresponding to the two different values of the shape parameters. The second method uses an analytic expression for the eigenvalue sensitivities of a general complex matrix, where the derivatives of the aerodynamic, mass, and stiffness matrices are computed using a finite difference approximation. The third method also uses an analytic expression for the eigenvalue sensitivities, but the aerodynamic matrix is computed analytically. All three methods are found to be in good agreement with each other.
Kapania, Rakesh K.↗
Shape sensitivity analysis of flutter response of a laminated wing
A method is presented for calculating the shape sensitivity of a wing aeroelastic response with respect to changes in geometric shape. Yates' modified strip method is used in conjunction with Giles' equivalent plate analysis to predict the flutter speed, frequency, and reduced frequency of the wing. Three methods are used to calculate the sensitivity of the eigenvalue. The first method is purely a finite difference calculation of the eigenvalue derivative directly from the solution of the flutter problem corresponding to the two different values of the shape parameters. The second method uses an analytic expression for the eigenvalue sensitivities of a general complex matrix, where the derivatives of the aerodynamic, mass, and stiffness matrices are computed using a finite difference approximation. The third method also uses an analytic expression for the eigenvalue sensitivities, but the aerodynamic matrix is computed analytically. All three methods are found to be in good agreement with each other. The sensitivities of the eigenvalues were used to predict the flutter speed, frequency, and reduced frequency. These approximations were found to be in good agreement with those obtained using a complete reanalysis.
Bergen, Fred D.↗