Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Karl Edquist

Publications and source records attributed to Karl Edquist.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2024

Completion of Dragonfly PPF Testing in the NFAC 80x120-Foot Wind Tunnel

The Dragonfly entry, descent, and landing team (JHU-APL, NASA Langley Research Center, NASA Ames Research Center, Sikorsky Aircraft) recently completed testing in the National Full-Scale Aerodynamics Complex (NFAC) 80x120-Foot Wind Tunnel. The facility is located at NASA Ames Research Center and is operated by the U.S. Air Force's Arnold Engineering Development Complex. The test was designed to simulate conditions of Preparation for Powered (PPF), an approximately 10-minute period during which the Lander is posed in front of the Backshell at low subsonic airspeeds, all under the main parachute, and the rotors are used to null residual Lander yaw rates prior to release i. e. de-spin. The Lander (approximately 50% scale) that previously was tested in the NASA Langley 14x22 Wind Tunnel in 2023 was used for the NFAC test with a new Backshell designed and fabricated specifically for NFAC. This memorandum summarizes execution of the test: objective, facility and models, instrumentation and data products, test procedure, and completed test matrix. Other future documents will include a test report (JHU-APL) and documentation of data processing/analysis and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) comparisons to test data (Sikorsky).

Dragonfly↗
NASA NTRS2019

TPSAS-NF1676L-34273-DND

These charts are part of a short course on aftbody aeroheating to be presented at TFAWS 2019.

Karl Edquist↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Human Mars Entry, Descent, and Landing Architecture Study: Phase 3 Summary

Over the past four years, NASA has directed the Entry, Descent and Landing Architecture Study (EDLAS) team to evaluate candidate technologies to deliver human-scale vehicles (carrying 20t payloads) to a precise location on the surface of Mars. The study, which initially considered four candidate vehicles, narrowed the design space to focus on two vehicles in Phase 3, one low and one mid lift-to-drag vehicle. Key design challenges exist for both, and the purpose of the Phase 3 analysis was to identify specific technology investment areas and opportunities to mature the vehicle designs beyond simulations to include ground and flight tests. This paper summarizes the detailed analyses performed on the two vehicle configurations, including aerodynamic and propulsive interference effects during the powered flight phase, vehicle packaging, as well as outer mold line and parametric mass model upgrades. The analyses were used to update models in the vehicle performance simulations. The simulation results showing the impact of the Phase 3 analyses on vehicle performance are also presented. Finally, a summary of the technology investment recommendations, including opportunities to validate models using wind tunnel tests and evaluate technologies at the moon, are presented. This paper offers a systems level overview of the more detailed analysis that will be presented in this special session.

Alicia Dwyer Cianciolo↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

New Developments in Retropropulsion Testing for Mars Entry, Descent and Landing

NASA’s plans for landing human-scale payloads on Mars in the next decade require that retrorockets be used to decelerate the atmospheric entry vehicle continuously from supersonic conditions through soft touchdown. Conventional Mars entry vehicle architectures that include a single parachute for supersonic-to-subsonic descent are not scalable to the sizes needed to land humans on Mars (~20 metric tons). The major aerosciences risks are the uncertainties in predicting aerodynamic stability and performance during powered free-flight and landing. These risks are influenced partially by current limitations in relevant data and testing methods. Consequently, trajectory simulations currently depend on unvalidated powered descent and landing aerodynamics models. NASA engineers have identified gaps in testing methods that, if addressed, would improve the ability to validate these models. There are gaps in capabilities to test multi-engine hot-gas retropropulsion systems in US wind tunnels. This is partially due to the successful use of parachutes as decelerators for human spaceflight at Earth and for the entire Mars lander program to date. Retropulsion test data historically and to this day are limited to using high pressure air jets, at comparatively low temperatures,as engine plume simulants on subscale wind tunnel models. Additionally, the ability to directly measure aerodynamic interference force and moments is limited by existing flow-through balance capabilities. This paper briefly covers historical and recent test data, and identifies new ground test techniques as a means to provide more relevant test data for powered flight and landing aerodynamic model validation.These techniques include using heated inert gases as a substitute for combustion products, additively manufactured 6-component flow-through force and moment balances, and off-body quantitative diagnostic measurements.

Retropropulsion↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Mars 2020 Reconstructed Aerothermal Environments and Design Margins

The Mars 2020 aeroshell's thermal protection system was nearly identical to the Mars Science Laboratory system that successfully completed its mission for the Curiosity rover's landing in 2012. It was predicted that, like Mars Science Laboratory, the Mars 2020 heatshield would experience boundary layer transition and that the thermal protection system would provide sufficient material thickness margins against the aerothermal environments, even after adding radiative heating that was not included for Mars Science Laboratory. The Mars 2020 flight instrumentation suite included heatshield sensors similar to Mars Science Laboratory and new backshell measurements. A full set of surface pressure and in-depth temperature data were collected during atmospheric entry. This paper provides an initial analysis of the flight data and focuses on the reconstructed total surface heat flux inferred from the measured temperatures. Turbulent boundary layer conditions again were observed on the Mars 2020 heatshield, and the temperatures at all eleven heatshield and six backshell thermocouple in-depth sensor locations were well within system capabilities due to favorable entry conditions and conservative uncertainties. New computational fluid dynamics results on the reconstructed entry trajectory are compared to the measured surface pressures and reconstructed total heat fluxes. The predicted heatshield surface pressures at six locations match the data qualitatively and quantitatively well, as expected. Smooth-wall laminar heating predictions prior to boundary layer transition fall above the reconstructed heating on the heatshield. After the observed boundary layer transition time, total heat flux based on algebraic turbulence model calculations generally match the heat flux trends relative to one another. The convective heat flux was predicted to constitute the majority of the total heating. On the backshell, smooth-wall laminar total heat flux predictions generally exceed the reconstructed total heating at six locations. At each of these locations, it is estimated that radiative heating provided almost all of the total heating. The Mars 2020 as-flown aerothermal environments were well below the design levels for all measurement locations due to conservative design assumptions and a stressing design trajectory.

Mars 2020↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Status of Mars Retropropulsion Testing in the Langley Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel

Future Mars human landings will be enabled by a powered descent phase starting at supersonic conditions, something which has never been done before on a Mars mission. Significant aerosciences challenges exist due to jet interactions between the retrorocket engine plumes, freestream flow, and vehicle that will affect the aerodynamic behavior during powered descent. Historically, wind tunnel tests have been used to study the interactions with inert gas exhaust simulants in place of rocket engines. On the computational side, flowfield simulations have been completed at full-scale conditions, but the available ground and flight data are not appropriate for calibrating computational uncertainties for aerodynamic interference on proposed Mars descent vehicles, due to insufficient data, dissimilar vehicle geometries, and disparate operating conditions. A wind tunnel test has been designed to begin addressing powered descent aerodynamics risks for large-scale human Mars entry concepts and to identify gaps in computational predictive capabilities. The test will be conducted in the NASA Langley Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel and is designed with improvements in model design and data products over past tests. The test campaign will be run using sub-scale model geometries derived from NASA powered descent reference vehicles: a blunt low lift-to-drag vehicle and a more slender geometry that generates higher unpowered lift. Both models have been fabricated and are ready for testing. The blunt model is equipped with the flexibility to examine the effects of nozzle pointing direction, number, location, size, and area ratio. The main measurements are heatshield aerodynamic interference forces and moments with a custom flow-through balance, discrete and distributed heatshield pressure, and high-speed flowfield visualization. This paper covers the test objectives, facility, models and instrumentation, and planned test matrix.

Supersonic Retropropulsion↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Computational Modeling of Mars Retropropulsion Concepts in the Langley Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel

Future human Mars missions will require powered descent starting at supersonic conditions, something which has never been done before at Mars. Computational powered descent flowfield simulations have been completed at full-scale Mars conditions, but the available ground test data are not appropriate for calibrating computational uncertainties for aerodynamic interference on proposed Mars descent vehicles. A test will be conducted in the NASA Langley Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel to begin addressing powered descent aerodynamics risks for large-scale human Mars entry concepts and to identify gaps in computational predictive capabilities. This paper covers pre-test computational flowfield predictions of two different models derived from full-scale reference vehicles: a blunt low lift-to-drag vehicle and a more slender geometry. Calculations of the blunt model include variations in nozzle configuration: nozzle location, size, area ratio, and pointing direction. There exist some significant differences between solvers, but some general trends are observed from simulations of the blunt model. First, aerodynamic axial force from the heatshield decreases with increasing thrust due to expanding plume blockage. Second, nozzles that point along the model axis result in lower aerodynamic axial force compared to nozzles that have a radial thrust component. Finally, placing the nozzles further away from the model nose preserves more heatshield axial force with increasing thrust compared to nozzles that are closer to the nose. For the slender model, the axial force from the heatshield is similar to the non-blowing axial force regardless of thrust magnitude, due to the nozzle arrangement on the heatshield. Once the test is completed, direct comparisons between the computations and test data will be made to determine computational uncertainties in a wind tunnel environment, to identify gaps in predictive capabilities, and to inform planning for future ground and flight test programs for Mars powered descent vehicles.

Supersonic Retropropulsion↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Development and Sizing of the Mars 2020 Thermal Protection System

The Mars 2020 entry vehicle successfully delivered the Perseverance rover to the Martian surface on 18 February 2021. The entry vehicle aeroshell was shielded from aerodynamic heating with a thermal protection system (TPS) made of three different ablative materials. This paper provides an overview of the methodology and assumptions employed for the thermal sizing and design of the Mars 2020 aeroshell TPS. The sizing results demonstrate that the as-built thicknesses of the TPS materials were sufficient to withstand the predicted aerothermal environments without exceeding temperature limits of the underlying aeroshell structure. This paper also provides an overview of the ground testing performed in NASA arc jet facilities to verify the performance of flight lot TPS materials. Finally, temperature data returned by thermocouples embedded in the flight vehicle TPS are compared with predictions by the thermal response models used in pre-flight TPS sizing.

Mars2020↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Lessons Learned from Aerothermal Flight Data on NASA Mars Entry Vehicles

The NASA Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) and Mars 2020 entry vehicles included temperature measurements inside and direct heat flux on the surface of the thermal protection system (TPS) material. The instrumentation was included to begin addressing predictive capabilities for aerodynamic heating and ablative TPS material response. The MSL aeroshell included temperature measurements at seven heatshield locations, from which total aerodynamic heating was reconstructed. The Mars 2020 instrumentation suite included eleven heatshield measurement locations and new backshell measurements at nine locations: six with temperature sensors, two with sensors to directly measure total heat flux, and one to measure radiative heat flux. Both instrumentation suites returned full sets of data, with all temperature sensors nearest to the surface surviving entry, indicating minimal material recession. Heatshield boundary layer transition (BLT) was observed for both vehicles prior to the time of peak heating, with transition starting near the shoulder and progressing towards the stagnation area. MSL’s higher speed on approach to Mars resulted in higher total heating compared to Mars 2020, with the maximum occurring near the heatshield’s leeside shoulder. The Mars 2020 backshell heating data indicate significant contributions from shock layer radiation. Heating from Navier-Stokes flowfield calculations are in family with reconstructed heating. The paper covers the instrumentation, BLT and reconstructed heating on both heatshields, backshell heating for Mars 2020, TPS performance, and predicted versus reconstructed heat fluxes. Opportunities for improved design approaches for future Mars missions are discussed, especially for the upcoming Mars Sample Return mission.

Mars Science Laboratory↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Lessons Learned from Aerothermal Flight Data on NASA Mars Entry Vehicles

The NASA Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) and Mars 2020 entry vehicles included temperature measurements inside and direct heat flux on the surface of the thermal protection system (TPS) material. The instrumentation was included to begin addressing predictive capabilities for aerodynamic heating and ablative TPS material response. The MSL aeroshell included temperature measurements at seven heatshield locations, from which total aerodynamic heating was reconstructed. The Mars 2020 instrumentation suite included eleven heatshield measurement locations and new backshell measurements at nine locations: six with temperature sensors, two with sensors to directly measure total heat flux, and one to measure radiative heat flux. Both instrumentation suites returned full sets of data, with all temperature sensors nearest to the surface surviving entry, indicating minimal material recession. Heatshield boundary layer transition (BLT) was observed for both vehicles prior to the time of peak heating, with transition starting near the shoulder and progressing towards the stagnation area. MSL’s higher speed on approach to Mars resulted in higher total heating compared to Mars 2020, with the maximum occurring near the heatshield’s leeside shoulder. The Mars 2020 backshell heating data indicate significant contributions from shock layer radiation. Heating from Navier-Stokes flowfield calculations are in family with reconstructed heating. The paper covers the instrumentation, BLT and reconstructed heating on both heatshields, backshell heating for Mars 2020, TPS performance, and predicted versus reconstructed heat fluxes. Opportunities for improved design approaches for future Mars missions are discussed, especially for the upcoming Mars Sample Return mission.

Mars Science Laboratory↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Development Status of Powered Descent for High-Mass Mars Entry, Descent, and Landing Systems

Retropropulsion, initiated at supersonic conditions, provides both deceleration and control authority as an enabling capability for the delivery of human-scale payloads to the surface of Mars. There are no other presently viable approaches to the descent phase of flight for vehicles of such scales. NASA continues to dedicate investment in the maturation of powered descent in atmospheric environments, for the express application to large-scale entry, descent, and landing systems. Efforts focus on parametric, subscale, inert gas ground testing, rigorous validation of computational modeling approaches against these data, and the implementation of highly efficient, scalable simulation tools. This paper summarizes the current maturity of retropropulsion in a free-flight, atmospheric environment for vehicles with significant aerodynamic surface area, as well as the current status of efforts within NASA for ground testing, computational simulation, and flight testing.

Ashley Korzun↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Development and Sizing of the Mars 2020 Thermal Protection System

The Mars 2020 entry vehicle successfully delivered the Perseverance rover to the Martian surface on 18 February 2021. The entry vehicle aeroshell was shielded from aerodynamic heating with a thermal protection system (TPS) made of three different ablative materials. This paper provides an overview of the methodology and assumptions employed for the thermal sizing and design of the Mars 2020 aeroshell TPS. The sizing results demonstrate that the as-built thicknesses of the TPS materials were sufficient to withstand the predicted aerothermal environments without exceeding temperature limits of the underlying aeroshell structure. This paper also provides an overview of the ground testing performed in NASA arc jet facilities to verify the performance of flight lot TPS materials. Finally, temperature data returned by thermocouples embedded in the flight vehicle TPS are compared with predictions by the thermal response models used in pre-flight TPS sizing.

Mars2020↗