Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Karlson, Kyle N.

Publications and source records attributed to Karlson, Kyle N..

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2024

MatCal Users Guide: Release 1.3.0

Any continuum mechanics model will require three components: (1) a discretized geometry of the boundary value problem being studied, (2) the partial differential equations to be solved, and (3) the initial conditions and boundary conditions for the problem. To describe material behavior in these computational models, material models contribute to (2) the underlying equations and, occasionally, to (3) the initial conditions for the simulation. These material models can exhibit a mathematical form that is empirically based, based on first principles, or developed from both empirical observations and known physics. In general, these models are meant to represent a class of materials with well understood behavior. As a result, material models have parameters that must be tuned or calibrated so that the model response matches characterization data available for the specific material it is intended to represent when used to simulate a specific system. For simple models, such as isotropic, linear elastic materials in solid mechanics, this calibration process can be a simple analytical calculation directly extracting the parameters from experimental measurements. For complex models that have many inputs and require many characterization datasets to adequately identify the material behavior, the model calibration process can require an inverse problem approach where an optimization is performed to tune the model parameters to the available data.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2023

Toward accurate prediction of partial-penetration laser weld performance informed by three-dimensional characterization – Part II: μCT based finite element simulations

The mechanical behavior of partial-penetration laser welds exhibits significant variability in engineering quantities such as strength and apparent ductility. Understanding the root cause of this variability is important when using such welds in engineering designs. In Part II of this work, we develop finite element simulations with geometry derived from micro-computed tomography (μCT) scans of partial-penetration 304L stainless steel laser welds that were analyzed in Part I. We use these models to study the effects of the welds’ small-scale geometry, including porosity and weld depth variability, on the structural performance metrics of weld ductility and strength under quasi-static tensile loading. We show that this small-scale geometry is the primary cause of the observed variability for these mechanical response quantities. Additionally, we explore the sensitivity of model results to the conversion of the μCT data to discretized model geometry using different segmentation algorithms, and to the effect of small-scale geometry simplifications for pore shape and weld root texture. The modeling approach outlined and results of this work may be applicable to other material systems with small-scale geometric features and defects, such as additively manufactured materials.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2021

Material Models and Credibility for System Level Abnormal Mechanical ModSim Applications

The purpose of this document is to provide evidence for assessing the adequacy of parameterized material models for a collection of materials used in a finite element analyses setting. “Adequacy” is relative to the intended use of the material in particular analyses. The intended application of the material models covered within this document is for system level abnormal mechanical solid mechanics analyses. Generally, material model parameterizations should be valid from temperatures of approximately -50 to 70° C, across a range of strain rates, and (depending on details of the parts involved) large deformations. Each material covered in this document is presented in its own chapter with a common format across materials. Model assumptions, limitations, existing validation results, readiness for use with uncertainty quantification, general usage guidance, and failure considerations are all provided along with specific parameterization inputs suitable for the finite element analysis code Sierra/Solid Mechanics.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2020

Comparing field data using Alpert multi-wavelets

In this paper we introduce a method to compare sets of full-field data using Alpert tree-wavelet transforms. The Alpert tree-wavelet methods transform the data into a spectral space allowing the comparison of all points in the fields by comparing spectral amplitudes. The methods are insensitive to translation, scale and discretization and can be applied to arbitrary geometries. This makes them especially well suited for comparison of field data sets coming from two different sources such as when comparing simulation field data to experimental field data. We have developed both global and local error metrics to quantify the error between two fields. Additionally, we verify the methods on two-dimensional and three-dimensional discretizations of analytical functions. Furthermore, we then deploy the methods to compare full-field strain data from a simulation of elastomeric syntactic foam.

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2019

Hierarchical Multi-scale Modeling of Laser Weld Failure: An Initial Investigation

The failure of 304L laser welds is of interest to system and component designers due to nuclear safety requirements for abnormal environments. Accurately modeling laser weld behavior in full system and component models has proven especially challenging due to three factors: the large variability observed in laser weld characterization tests; the difficulty in isolating the weld material for material characterization and modeling the weld material behavior; and the disparate scales associated with modeling laser welds in large systems. Recent work has shown that meso-scale geometric features of laser welds such as pores and weld root tortuosity are critical to accurately predicting the structural performance of welds. The challenge with modeling these welds is that the geometric features driving their structural performance are generally on the order of ten to hundreds of microns, but can affect the responses of interest in systems and components on the order of centimeters to meters.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2019

Sandia Fracture Challenge 3: detailing the Sandia Team Q failure prediction strategy

The third Sandia Fracture Challenge illustrated the geometric and material uncertainties presented by modern additive manufacturing techniques. Tasked with the challenge of predicting failure of a complex additively-manufactured geometry made of 316L stainless steel, we combined a rigorous material calibration scheme with a number of statistical assessments of problem uncertainties. Particularly, we used optimization techniques to calibrate a rate-dependent and anisotropic Hill plasticity model to represent material deformation coupled with a damage model driven by void growth and nucleation. Through targeted simulation studies we assessed the influence of internal voids and surface flaws on the specimens of interest in the challenge which guided our material modeling choices. Employing the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test statistic, we developed a representative suite of simulations to account for the geometric variability of test specimens and the variability introduced by material parameter uncertainty. This method allowed the team to successfully predict the failure mode of the experimental test population as well as the global response with a high degree of accuracy.

316L stainless steel↗