This report documents a study performed to investigate the requirements for criticality safety benchmark experiments for high-assay, low-enriched uranium (HALEU) fuel in transportation applications. In this work, an exploratory application model, the “Pebble Tanker,” was developed to represent TRISO fuel in a transportation scenario for an analysis of the validation basis in industrial quantities. An aspect of the criticality validation process involves assessing the “similarity” between application and experimental benchmark systems through an integral index parameter evaluation. Here, this includes propagating nuclear data uncertainties and calculating a correlation coefficient (hereinafter referred to as “c k ”) to evaluate the similarity of benchmark experiments compared with the application Pebble Tanker model. Finding sufficient critical benchmark experiments allows for the evaluation of bias and bias uncertainty, thus determining the upper subcritical limit (USL) of the transportation package. A target k eff of ~0.94 was used in this work to establish appropriate modeling conditions, reflecting a reasonable estimate for a USL. Two container models were investigated: one with the Hermes-type pebble and one with the Pebble Bed Modular Reactor (PBMR)–type pebble. The models were simplified, considering only fuel, containment structure, and either water or air. This allows a focus on the underlying physics of applications involving TRISO fuel pebbles using the Pebble Tanker model. A crucial consideration is the transport package's ability to safely hold pebbles while flooded, maintaining subcritical conditions. Tools available in the SCALE 6.3.1 suite—the CSAS6-Shift, TSUNAMI-3D-Shift, and TSUNAMI-IP sequences—were employed for neutronics and sensitivity and uncertainty (S/U) analysis of the Pebble Tanker. Findings demonstrated sufficient available critical experiment benchmarks to perform a validation of the Pebble Tanker in the most reactive state, i.e., when the Tanker is flooded.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2024

Status of the Verified, Archived, Library of Inputs and Data (VALID) [Slides]

This presentation begins with a brief project overview and a note on sponsors. This presentation includes a reminder of cases added in FY2021 and FY2022 along with cases currently in progress. The presentation concludes with some future plans for VALID.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

DOE OSTI2023

Coupling SCALE with DAKOTA for Axial Burnup Profiles Assessment in Burnup Credit [Slides]

This presentation found that the coupling methodology between SCALE and DAKOTA can be built within the NEAMS Workbench. This coupling provides a powerful and flexible toolset that increases the capabilities of the SCALE code system enabling the analysis of various engineering problems. This presentation presented is a specific application of this coupling methodology to axial burnup profile treatment in BUC, showcasing the usefulness of coupling SCALE and DAKOTA to perform criticality safety analyses.

04 OIL SHALES AND TAR SANDS↗

DOE OSTI2023

Coupling SCALE with DAKOTA for Axial Burnup Profiles Assessment in Burnup Credit

This paper presents a computational study that demonstrates the application of the SCALE code system in conjunction with the Design Analysis Kit for Optimization and Terascale Applications (DAKOTA) for the analysis of key factors influencing the evaluation of burnup credit (BUC) in pressurized water reactors (PWRs). The primary objective of this analysis is to characterize the model by utilizing parameterization, uncertainty quantification, and optimization studies. Using this approach, we can comprehensively assess the system and conduct informed predictive studies. This study highlights the effectiveness of the SCALE code system integrated within the DAKOTA framework in terms of efficiency and capability. With the coupling of the burnup code ORIGAMI with the CSAS or TSUNAMI-3D sequence embedded in a DAKOTA analysis, we can characterize the factors that influence the k eff of PWR 17x17 spent nuclear fuel (SNF) in the GBC-32 computational benchmark cask for the assessment of BUC in criticality safety analysis. The coupling methodology used in this study is not exclusive to BUC analysis. However, the choice to apply this methodology to the BUC problem is particularly significant because of the diverse range of aspects it encompasses in nuclear criticality safety analyses. This problem presents a unique opportunity to explore and address multiple facets of such analyses related to BUC and illustrates the capability of the SCALE code system with DAKOTA. This analysis makes use of historical reference data for the axial burnup profile, where the entire space within the bounds is considered. Both SCALE and DAKOTA are currently integrated in the Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling Simulation (NEAMS) Workbench code system, which has a user-friendly graphical interface that simplifies the setup of simulations and configuration of input parameters as well as the visualization of simulation results.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

DOE OSTI2023

IMPACT OF RECENT ENDF NUCLEAR DATA ON BURNUP CREDIT CRITICALITY SAFETY ANALYSES

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Dupont, Mathieu↗

DOE OSTI2023

Assessing the Impact of Sensitivity/Uncertainty-Based Selection Criteria on Computational Bias Prediction [Slides]

This discussion assesses the impact of sensitivity/uncertainty-based selection criteria on computational bias prediction. This presentation details the development of a tool to calculate the predicted computational bias for a given application as a function the c k threshold.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

DOE OSTI2022

Reactor Performance and Safety Characteristics of Beryllium-Based Composite Moderators as Replacements for Graphite in mHTGRs

Here, this study evaluates beryllium-based two-phase composite moderators as an alternative to graphite in an evaluation of reactor performance and safety characteristics. Historically, modular high-temperature gas-cooled reactors (mHTGRs) use graphite as a moderator because of its high moderating ratio and reasonable thermal properties; however, graphite has unfavorable properties under irradiation, which can require component replacement and a significant radioactive waste burden. In this assessment, we explore advanced moderators comprised of magnesium oxide (MgO) as the host matrix and beryllium metal and/or beryllium oxide (Be and/or BeO) as the entrained moderating phase. For the reactor performance and thermal-hydraulic safety analysis, the core design model of the General Atomics mHTGR-350 was used to demonstrate the feasibility of a “drop-in” replacement of graphite using the beryllium-based moderators. We employed the neutronics code Serpent to analyze the moderating behavior of the composite moderators with comparisons drawn to graphite. We performed a scoping analysis of accidents for mHTGRs using RELAP to show that these moderators do not present impediments to safety and are expected to stay within temperature limits. Measured thermophysical properties of the composite moderators are used in the thermal-hydraulic assessments. Our analysis reveals that the two-phase composite MgO-matrix beryllium-based moderators are a suitable replacement for graphite.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗