Engineering topics

Kaste, Joshua A. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Kaste, Joshua A. M..

3 records

DOE OSTI2024

Reaction-diffusion modeling provides insights into biophysical carbon-concentrating mechanisms in land plants

Carbon-concentrating mechanisms (CCMs) have evolved numerous times in photosynthetic organisms. They elevate the concentration of CO 2 around the carbon-fixing enzyme rubisco, thereby increasing CO 2 assimilatory flux and reducing photorespiration. Biophysical CCMs, like the pyrenoid-based CCM (PCCM) of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii or carboxysome systems of cyanobacteria, are common in aquatic photosynthetic microbes, but in land plants appear only among the hornworts. To predict the likely efficiency of biophysical CCMs in C 3 plants, we used spatially resolved reaction-diffusion models to predict rubisco saturation and light use efficiency. We found that the energy efficiency of adding individual CCM components to a C 3 land plant is highly dependent on the permeability of lipid membranes to CO 2 , with values in the range reported in the literature that are higher than those used in previous modeling studies resulting in low light use efficiency. Adding a complete PCCM into the leaf cells of a C 3 land plant was predicted to boost net CO 2 fixation, but at higher energetic costs than those incurred by photorespiratory losses without a CCM. Two notable exceptions were when substomatal CO 2 levels are as low as those found in land plants that already use biochemical CCMs and when gas exchange is limited, such as with hornworts, making the use of a biophysical CCM necessary to achieve net positive CO 2 fixation under atmospheric CO 2 levels. This provides an explanation for the uniqueness of hornworts' CCM among land plants and the evolution of pyrenoids multiple times.

Kaste, Joshua A. M.↗

DOE OSTI2023

Model validation and selection in metabolic flux analysis and flux balance analysis

13C-Metabolic Flux Analysis (13C-MFA) and Flux Balance Analysis (FBA) are widely used to investigate the operation of biochemical networks in both biological and biotechnological research. Both methods use metabolic reaction network models of metabolism operating at steady state so that reaction rates (fluxes) and the levels of metabolic intermediates are constrained to be invariant. They provide estimated (MFA) or predicted (FBA) values of the fluxes through the network in vivo, which cannot be measured directly. These fluxes can shed light on basic biology and have been successfully used to inform metabolic engineering strategies. Several approaches have been taken to test the reliability of estimates and predictions from constraint-based methods and to compare alternative model architectures. Despite advances in other areas of the statistical evaluation of metabolic models, such as the quantification of flux estimate uncertainty, validation and model selection methods have been underappreciated and underexplored. We review the history and state-of-the-art in constraint-based metabolic model validation and model selection. Applications and limitations of the χ 2 -test of goodness-of-fit, the most widely used quantitative validation and selection approach in 13C-MFA, are discussed, and complementary and alternative forms of validation and selection are proposed. A combined model validation and selection framework for 13C-MFA incorporating metabolite pool size information that leverages new developments in the field is presented and advocated for. Finally, we discuss how adopting robust validation and selection procedures can enhance confidence in constraint-based modeling as a whole and ultimately facilitate more widespread use of FBA in biotechnology.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗

DOE OSTI2023

Integrative teaching of metabolic modeling and flux analysis with interactive python modules

Abstract The modeling of rates of biochemical reactions—fluxes—in metabolic networks is widely used for both basic biological research and biotechnological applications. A number of different modeling methods have been developed to estimate and predict fluxes, including kinetic and constraint‐based (Metabolic Flux Analysis and flux balance analysis) approaches. Although different resources exist for teaching these methods individually, to‐date no resources have been developed to teach these approaches in an integrative way that equips learners with an understanding of each modeling paradigm, how they relate to one another, and the information that can be gleaned from each. We have developed a series of modeling simulations in Python to teach kinetic modeling, metabolic control analysis, 13C‐metabolic flux analysis, and flux balance analysis. These simulations are presented in a series of interactive notebooks with guided lesson plans and associated lecture notes. Learners assimilate key principles using models of simple metabolic networks by running simulations, generating and using data, and making and validating predictions about the effects of modifying model parameters. We used these simulations as the hands‐on computer laboratory component of a four‐day metabolic modeling workshop and participant survey results showed improvements in learners' self‐assessed competence and confidence in understanding and applying metabolic modeling techniques after having attended the workshop. The resources provided can be incorporated in their entirety or individually into courses and workshops on bioengineering and metabolic modeling at the undergraduate, graduate, or postgraduate level.

Kaste, Joshua A. M.↗