Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Kathleen E. Vander Kaaden

Publications and source records attributed to Kathleen E. Vander Kaaden.

Revisiting the petrogenesis of pyroclastic glass bead deposits at the Apollo 15 and 17 sites

The Apollo 15 low-titanium and Apollo 17 high-titanium pyroclastic glass beads are amongst the most primitive magmatically derived samples obtained from the Moon. Two key samples, the low-Ti Apollo 15426 green glass clod and the high-Ti Apollo 74220 orange glass are morphologically distinct, where the Apollo 15 beads are larger (~ 107 μm along maximum axis) and more fractured, and the Apollo 17 are smaller (~42 μm) and less fractured. In this study, holohyaline beads as well as crystallized beads were examined from both samples. Crystallized beads show compositional variability in major, minor, and trace elements and enable examination of magmatic mineral fractionation processes during cooling of both deposits. The Apollo 15426 beads experienced variable olivine crystallization, whereas the Apollo 74220 beads experienced both olivine and ilmenite crystallization. Holohyaline beads from both deposits show more limited major, minor, and trace element variability than their crystallized counterparts. Trace element abundance data for individual holohyaline beads show that in Apollo 74220, they are tightly clustered at ~30 × Carbonaceous Ivuna chondrite [CI] with negative Eu anomalies and subchondritic Nb/Ta, and interpreted to reflect the presence of late-stage magma ocean cumulate overturned into an otherwise primitive mantle source. Incompatible trace element abundances for holohyaline beads in 15426 are supra-chondritic from ~8 × CI, to >80 × CI, with pronounced relative depletions in Sr and Eu for the most incompatible element enriched beads, which represent a distinct bead group within the deposit. Apollo 15426 beads have elevated Ni and Co abundances at the edges of the beads compared to their centers. These data are interpreted to reflect a more complex magmatic evolution of the 15426 deposit, beginning with: (i) initial magma generation, storage and assimilation within shallower low-Ca and high-Ca pyroxene bearing magma ocean cumulates (15B,C); (ii) mobilization of the earlier magmas by more recently generated primitive magmas (15A); (iii) eruption and crystallization of some beads (15D,E), and (iv) later jumbling of the deposit, possible impact contamination and addition of exotic bead components (J Group). In contrast, the 74220 data shows no discernable difference between Ni and Co abundances at the edges and centers supporting prior observations for limited melt fractionation and an absence of meteoritic components. It is further suggested that both deposits are likely to have been formed in the presence of a transient atmosphere. Using 74220 melt compositions from this study, post-entrapment crystallization abundances range from 266 to 1130 micrograms/g for H 2 O, 36 to 68 micrograms/g for F, 441 to 832 micrograms/g for S, and zero to 2.31 micrograms/g for Cl, consistent with prior studies and suggesting up to ~0.1 wt.% H 2 O in the melt, with considerably less in the source. The role that late-stage magma ocean cumulates rich in ilmenite, apatite and high-Ca pyroxene might play in modifying this volatile element estimate, however, casts remaining doubt on the volatile element abundance and evolution of the primitive Moon.

Moon↗

Recommended Laboratory and Field Studies ahead of Future Mercury Exploration

Data from Mariner 10, MESSENGER, and ground-based telescopic observations have facilitated great advancements towards understanding the geochemistry, geology, internal structure, and space environment (exosphere/magnetosphere) of Mercury. Future exploration efforts by BepiColombo, landed science, and sample return will revolutionize our understanding of this planet. However, to enhance the scientific return of past, present, and future data collection at Mercury, it is imperative that laboratory and field-based studies be conducted over the next decade. This white paper gives examples of laboratory and field studies, including instrument testing, which should take place over the next decade to facilitate the interpretation of data and preparation of future missions to the inner-most planet. By no means are the topics in this paper exhaustive, but rather are meant to demonstrate the immense amount of work that needs to be completed ahead of, or in conjunction with, current and future exploration efforts of Mercury. This work would amplify the benefits from additional data obtained from the planet’s surface to the fullest extent possible, and to aid in decision making of future instrument payloads. We have chosen to focus our inputs here on geochemistry, geology, and space environment related efforts, but we emphasize that extensive research in the areas of geophysics and other geosciences-related disciplines will benefit from additional studies.

Kathleen E. Vander Kaaden↗

Constraints on the Abundances of Carbon and Silicon in Mercury's Core From Experiments in the Fe‐Si‐C System

The composition of a planet’s core has important implications for the thermal and magmatic evolution of that planet. Here, we conducted carbon (C)solubility experiments on iron-silicon (Fe-Si)metal mixtures (up to 35 wt%(~52 atom%)Si) at 1 GPa and 800–1800°C to determine the carbon concentration at graphite saturation (CCGS) in metallic melt and crystalline metal with varying proportions of Fe and Si to constrain the C content of Mercury’s core. Our results, combined with those in the literature, show that composition is the major controlling factor for carbon solubility in Fe-rich metal with minimal effects from temperature and pressure. Moreover, there is a strong anti-correlation between the abundances of carbon and silicon in iron-rich metallic systems. Based on the previous estimates of <1–25 wt% Si in Mercury’s core, our results indicate that a carbon-saturated mercurian core has 0.5–6.4wt% C, with 6.4wt% C corresponding to an Si-free, Fe core and 0.5wt% C corresponding to an Fe-rich core with 25 wt% Si. The upper end of estimated FeO abundances in the mantle(up to 2.2 wt%)are consistent with a core that has <1 wt% Siand up to 6.4 wt% C, which would imply that bulk Mercury has a superchondritic Fe/Si ratio. However,the lower end of estimated FeO (≤ 0.05 wt%) support CB-chondrite like bulk compositions of Mercury with core Si abundances in the range of 5–18.5 wt% 33 and C abundances in the range of 0.8–4.0 wt%.

Kathleen E. Vander Kaaden↗