Engineering topics
Publications and source records attributed to Kennedy, D..
VICONOPT calculates vibrations and instabilities of assemblies of prismatic plates. Designed for efficient, accurate analysis of buckling and vibration, and for optimum design of panels of composite materials. Written in FORTRAN 77.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A computer program which is designed for efficient, accurate buckling and vibration analysis and optimum design of composite panels is described. The capabilities of the program are given along with detailed user instructions. It is written in FORTRAN 77 and is operational on VAX, IBM, and CDC computers and should be readily adapted to others. Several illustrations of the various aspects of the input are given along the example problems illustrating the use and application of the program.
BUNVIS-RG computer program designed to calculate vibration frequencies or buckling loads of prestressed lattice structures used in outer space. For buckling and vibration problems, BUNVIS-RG calculates deadload axial forces caused in members by any combination of externally-applied static point forces and moments at nodes, axial preload or prestrain in members, and such acceleration loads as those due to gravity. BUNVIS-RG is FORTRAN 77 computer program implemented on CDC CYBER and VAX computer.
The analytical derivation, numerical implementation, and performance of a multiple-determinant parabolic interpolation method (MDPIM) for use in solving transcendental eigenvalue (critical buckling or undamped free vibration) problems in structural mechanics are presented. The overall bounding, eigenvalue-separation, qualified parabolic interpolation, accuracy-confirmation, and convergence-recovery stages of the MDPIM are described in detail, and the numbers of iterations required to solve sample plane-frame problems using the MDPIM are compared with those for a conventional bisection method and for the Newtonian method of Simpson (1984) in extensive tables. The MDPIM is shown to use 31 percent less computation time than bisection when accuracy of 0.0001 is required, but 62 percent less when accuracy of 10 to the -8th is required; the time savings over the Newtonian method are about 10 percent.