Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Kent L. Gee

Publications and source records attributed to Kent L. Gee.

7 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2023

Acoustics Technical Working Group and UAM Noise Working Group Proceedings

The NASA Acoustics Technical Working Group Meeting originally started as a program planning meeting in 1992 and has grown through the years. The purpose of these biannual meetings is to foster communication and collaboration among NASA researchers and their university, industry, and government colleagues on activities and work of current and future mutual interest. The NASA-led Urban Air Mobility (UAM) Noise Working Group (UNWG) Meeting began in 2018 as a one-day meeting immediately following the Acoustics Technical Working Group Meeting. The UNWG utilizes four subgroups that conduct regular meetings throughout the year to focus on challenges facing UAM vehicles for community noise and acceptance. The four subgroups coordinate research for development of noise prediction tools/noise reduction technologies, ground and flight test methods, human response and metrics, and regulations and policy (led by the FAA). This work is a compilation of the presentations given at ATWG/UNWG Fall 2022 held in person and via Teams at NASA Glenn Research Center. All NASA content was previously submitted through STRIVES for public presentation. This is merely a compilation. Non-NASA content has permission to distribute. Slide 208 video is included in the Available Downloads as Medial.MOV.

Advanced Air Mobility↗
NASA NTRS2021

Characterizing the Effects of Two Ground-based Outdoor Microphone Configurations

Multiple International and Federal regulations stipulate the acquisition of aircraft noise shall be conducted using inverted pressure microphones over a round ground board. These ground boards are used to provide an acoustically hard reflecting surface, limiting the effects of the potentially absorptive ground local to the test location. The microphone location is also specified to be offset from the center of the board to limit the effects of acoustic diffraction off the board edge. In order to determine the effects of the ground board on the measured acoustic signal, a comprehensive measurement campaign was undertaken at NASA Langley Research Center. The experimental setup included multiple ground board configurations placed on top of a sand pit, in an otherwise anechoic chamber. Ground board configurations included a microphone inverted and offset over the round ground board and a microphone offset and flush mounted in the ground board.White noise was then used to investigate the ground board effects on the recorded signal. Normal impedance measurements were also acquired to determine the reflection coefficients of the sand and ground boards. Experimental results are discussed, along with implications for future research and development.Results indicate that both microphone configurations perform adequately up to 10 kHz. When the ground substrate is a soft material and the sound comes in at angles near grazing incidence the sound energy is attenuated above 1 kHz. Additionally, the plastic material used to construct the ground boards was found to be acoustically hard between 0.1 –3.0 kHz, and likely extending to higher frequencies.

Mark C. Anderson↗
NASA NTRS2020

Development of a Weather-Robust Ground-Based System for Sonic Boom Measurements

This report describes Brigham Young University’s (BYU) development and testing of a weather-robust, ground-based system for sonic boom measurements, carried out in support of NASA’s Quiet Supersonic Flight (QSF) initiative. The microphone configuration system, referred to as the Compact Outdoor Unit for Ground-based Acoustical Recordings (COUGAR, for the BYU mascot), was tested at NASA’s 2018 Quiet Supersonic Flight (QSF18) campaign and at the subsequent 2019 Carpet Determination in Entirety Measurements (CarpetDIEM) program.

sonic boom↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Comparing Two Weather-Robust Microphone Configurations for Outdoor Measurements

This paper discusses comparisons made between two ground-based outdoor microphone configurations. The first is known as the Compact Outdoor Unit for Ground-based Acoustical Recordings (COUGAR) and consists of an inverted microphone placed above a convex circular plate and covered by a large dome windscreen. The second configuration is the COUGARxt, where the “xt” simultaneously refers to an extra thick windscreen and an extra thin ground plate. COUGAR and COUGARxt were subjected to laboratory testing where their responses to sound were recorded at several different elevation and azimuthal angles. At almost all shown elevation angles, both configurations recorded levels that were within ±3 dB of a baseline measurement between 50 Hz – 20 kHz. At all shown azimuthal angles and over the same frequency range, both recorded levels within ±2 dB of the levels reported at an azimuthal angle of 0°, with COUGARxt having less variation than COUGAR. The configurations were also subjected to wind noise testing, where COUGARxt demonstrated superior wind noise rejection at low frequencies. The conclusion is that both configurations are suitable for outdoor acoustical measurements and that COUGARxt is the superior configuration, especially when measuring low-frequency noise.

sonic boom↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Development of a Weather Robust Microphone Configuration for Sonic Boom Measurements

This paper discusses ongoing development and testing of ground-based, weather-robust microphone measurement systems in conjunction with preparation for community testing of the NASA X-59 quiet supersonic aircraft. Prior efforts [Anderson et al., Proc. Mtgs. Acoust. 42, 040005 (2022)] resulted in the refinement of a ground-plate setup by investigating varied windscreen and plate diameters and thicknesses. The most recent goal has been to make the setup more compact and easier to manufacture. This paper discusses the results of additional tests performed on updated designs meant to find the balance between compactness and performance. Anechoic chamber testing was performed to examine ground plate and windscreen performance and to compare results against prior versions. Outdoor tests included measurements during different wind conditions and over different ground surfaces to examine low-frequency wind noise reduction and ground impedance effects. Results discussed during the presentation suggest the new design strikes an acceptable compromise between compactness, manufacturing ease and robustness, and performance. [Work supported by NASA Langley Research Center through Analytical Mechanics Associates]

sonic boom↗