MCP agents in PanDA
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
Engineering topics
Kilic, Ozgur O.
Publications and source records attributed to Kilic, Ozgur O..
AI Surrogate Model for Distributed Computing Workloads
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
MemFriend: Understanding Memory Performance with Spatial-Temporal Affinity
In HPC applications, memory access behavior is one of the main factors affecting performance. Improving an application’s memory access behavior involves optimizing data layout and/or restructuring code, and requires studying spatial-temporal data locality. Existing data locality analyses focus on single-location metrics and are restricted to evaluating temporal locality. We introduce spatial-temporal affinity metrics that quantify temporal access proximity, forward access correlation, and nearby access correlation between pairs of memory locations. We describe methods for distinguishing between potential vs. realized affinity and for reasoning about affinity at multiple resolutions (3D, 2D, 1D). Finally, we construct spatial-temporal affinity signatures that classify memory behavior and that be used to reason about changes in software (data relayout, code refactoring) or hardware (caching, prefetching). We describe methods for signature visualization, interpretation, and quantitative comparison of signatures. We evaluate our methodology using applications with variants that contrast data structures, data layouts and algorithms. We show that spatial-temporal affinity analysis provides novel insights and enables predictive reasoning about application performance when contrasted with reuse distance analysis.
Suriyakumar, Yasodhadevi↗
MemGaze: Rapid and Effective Load-Level Memory Trace Analysis
A major challenge of memory analysis tools is combining high-resolution analysis and low overhead measurement. Currently, hardware/software-based analysis of load-level sequences incurs time slowdowns of O(100×). We present MemGaze, a tool for low-overhead, high-resolution memory analysis. MemGaze uses Intel’s Processor Tracing (PT) instruction ptwrite to collect sampled and compressed memory address traces for load-level, sequence-aware analysis of data reuse. We describe multi-resolution analysis for locations vs. operations, accesses vs. spatio-temporal reuse, and reuse (distance, rate, volume) vs. access patterns. Both trace size and resolution are controllable. We use MemGaze to elucidate the memory effects of different data structures and algorithms. For sampled traces that are ˜1% of a full one, analysis metrics have 1-25% MAPE for histograms of varying dynamic sequence lengths. With current suboptimal kernel support (PT runs continuously), MemGaze’s time overhead is typically 10–95%; 7× at worst. However, when PT runs only during samples, overhead is 10–35% on memory intensive regions and correlates with executed ptwrites.
Kilic, Ozgur O.↗
Fixing Amdahl's Law within the Limits of Accelerated Systems: FALLACY
Closeout report for FALLACY project. The performance of Data Model Convergence Initiative (DMC) applications on parallel machines is far below the limit set by Amdahl’s law. Whether the machine is based on many-core, GPUs, FPGAs, or a heterogeneous combination, usually the most significant bottleneck is accessing data from the memory system. Aligning with DMC’s HW/architecture thrust, this project developed a set of memory-centric tools called ‘MemGaze’ that inform the HW/SW stack about an application’s memory behavior, including data access latency and diagnosing poor data layout and data composition. Our approach uses architectural modeling and analysis of workload data accesses.
97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
Rapid Memory Footprint Access Diagnostics
Footprint and reuse distance measure temporal locality and therefore do not capture the significance of access patterns (spacial locality). A strided access pattern has the largest possible footprint but usually has the best performance. To highlight exposed memory latency, we separate footprint into strided (prefetchable) and irregular (non-prefetchable) access components and calculate the growth rate of each. To rapidly compute these footprint access diagnostics, we present two methods, whole-program and precise. Current footprint analyses can cause 200× or more slowdown with realistic inputs and are therefore impractical. Our whole-program method reduces the overhead to 10% by computing upper bounds, but still yields inter-procedural insight through a call path profile. Our precise method uses additional static analysis and profiling to refine the upper bounds for intra-procedural loop nests. We evaluate our approaches using benchmarks that vary access patterns (strided \vs unpredictable), sparsity (all words in a cache line \vs some), and reuse (varying and repeated accesses per element). Notably, for loop nests with unpredictable accesses, the precise method's accuracy is within 10% of ideal. The whole-program method has sufficient accuracy to diagnose bottlenecks.
data locality, memory footprint, footprint access ↗