Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Kim, Junggon

Publications and source records attributed to Kim, Junggon.

10 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2022

Simulating Mars: Enabling Testing of the Perseverance Rover Sampling and Caching Subsystem on Earth

The development of the Sampling and Caching Subsystem (SCS) on the JPL Perseverance Rover lies at the intersection of testing, robotics, and geology. The SCS team established three primary system test campaigns and venues to aid in the development of SCS through verification and validation testing – Qualification Model Dirty Testing (QMDT) to provide a venue for testing in a Martian environment, Vehicle System Testbed (VSTB) for testing while integrated with the mobility subsystem on Martian-like terrain, and the Flight Software Testbed (FSWTB) for conducting tests using the flight motor controllers and software system on a hexapod which had the ability to simulate rover tilt. Each venue contributed a vital piece to the SCS building blocks. However, the QMDT venue operating within a 10-ft diameter Thermal Vacuum chamber to simulate Martian environment provided a sui generis opportunity to fine tune the entire sampling and caching process while building the team’s knowledge base about rock drillability, system life, and target selection. On Earth, because Martian rocks are not readily available, the development team must utilize geoanalogs to the rocks and regolith on Mars. Geologists on the team helped establish a set of standard rock types to use for Mars missions, like Basalt, Sandstone, Mudstone, Gypsum, and other related geoanalogs. These geoanalogs are characterized with a standard suite of tests for density, compressibility, and other characteristics to categorize potential drillability. This concept of drillability is what links the geoanalogs on Earth to the samples we collect on Mars. With the simulant characteristics defined, these geoanalog rocks are ready to be drilled into as we do on the Martian surface. A key aspect of interacting with the surface on Mars is rock target identification and selection. The Perseverance robotic system uses the on-board cameras, instrumentation, and software to collect enough information to identify potential scientific targets. With the targets identified, SCS can place the Corer and abrade the surface or collect a sample. For a ground test activity like QMDT, the test team did not have all of the camera and instrumentation systems that the rover does, so the team developed ground test equivalents to process a rock, build a target map, and define the target. The team constructed a Rock Scanning Station to build a 3D point cloud of the rock. This point cloud was then processed and evaluated with predefined and programmed criteria in a Target Downselect Tool. A primary output of the Target Downselect Tool is a defined target that can be uploaded directly to the robotic software system to simulate and build the robotic sequences used in tests. With these insights and programmatic definition of targets, the QMDT test team was able to make the same decisions that the Perseverance surface operations team does. In addition, valuable lessons learned from developing the target selection ground tools and using them were implemented into the tools used for surface operations.

Kim, Junggon↗
NASA NTRS2021

InSight Robotic Arm Testing Activities for HP3 Mole Anomaly Recovery on Mars

The InSight lander’s Heat Flow and Physical Properties Package (HP3 ) was deployed on Mars in February 2019 and began attempting to penetrate to its target depth range of 3-5 meters shortly thereafter. However, the mole’s downward progress stopped after only 35 cm of penetration. In response, the project convened an Anomaly Response Team (ART) and since then has been attempting to diagnose the problem and assist the mole using the tools available on Mars. The key asset used in this effort has been the Instrument Deployment System (IDS), which includes two cameras and a robotic Instrument Deployment Arm (IDA). Since the IDS was originally intended only to deploy InSight’s primary instruments to the Martian surface, new testbed setups, experiments, and operational protocols (e.g., command sequences) were required and had to be developed on a short timeline. The HP3 Mole ART first focused on gathering all observable data on Mars about the state of the mole and Support Structure Assembly (SSA), as well as the physical properties of the Martian regolith. This included using the robotic arm to point the IDC (Instrument Deployment Camera) at the SSA during diagnostic hammering attempts to observe motion of the SSA and science tether. Images taken during these attempts revealed some motion of the SSA, but no apparent change in mole depth. At JPL, the IDS and Testbed teams re-created the hardware configuration on Mars based on limited knowledge of the mole’s state. They devised and tested techniques to use the robotic arm and cameras to accomplish previously untested activities on Mars, including imaging the HP3 , using the IDA to interact with the terrain, and using the IDA to move the SSA away from the partially-embedded mole. The team executed the more promising techniques on Mars. After diagnostic hammering on Mars, the team decided to move the SSA to gain visibility of the mole’s configuration and access to the soil around the mole. After developing the technique and practicing the maneuver in the InSight testbed, the team lifted the SSA on Mars and placed it behind the mole. This revealed a pit surrounding the now exposed mole, observations of which provided essential clues for determining the root cause of the mole’s lack of progress. The IDS and Testbed teams altered the testbed to match the situation on Mars. They devised IDA techniques to determine the Martian soil properties and assist the mole’s descent. They tested these techniques in the testbed and executed the more promising ones on Mars. These include using the robotic arm to alter the regolith near the mole and to push on the mole while it hammers. This paper discusses the anomaly resolution testing in the testbed at JPL, describes how the IDS team prepared for the anomaly recovery activities on Mars, and provides preliminary results of the efforts to assist the HP3 mole on Mars.

Kim, Junggon↗
NASA NTRS2020

InSight Robotic Arm Testing Activities for HP3 Mole Anomaly Recovery on Mars

The InSight lander’s Heat Flow and Physical Properties Package (HP3) was deployed on Mars in February 2019and began attempting to penetrate to its target depth range of3-5 meters shortly thereafter. However, the mole’s downwardprogress stopped after only 35 cm of penetration. In response,the project convened an Anomaly Response Team (ART) andsince then has been attempting to diagnose the problem andassist the mole using the tools available on Mars. The key assetused in this effort has been the Instrument Deployment System(IDS), which includes two cameras and a robotic InstrumentDeployment Arm (IDA). Since the IDS was originally intendedonly to deploy InSight’s primary instruments to the Martiansurface, new testbed setups, experiments, and operational protocols (e.g., command sequences) were required and had to bedeveloped on a short timeline. The HP3 Mole ART first focusedon gathering all observable data on Mars about the state ofthe mole and Support Structure Assembly (SSA), as well asthe physical properties of the Martian regolith. This includedusing the robotic arm to point the IDC at the SSA duringdiagnostic hammering attempts to observe motion of the SSAand science tether. Images taken during these attempts revealedsome motion of the SSA, but no apparent change in mole depth.At JPL, the IDS and Testbed teams re-created the hardwareconfiguration on Mars based on limited knowledge of the mole’sstate. They devised and tested techniques to use the roboticarm and cameras to accomplish previously untested activitieson Mars, including imaging the HP3, using the IDA to interactwith the terrain, and using the IDA to move the SSA awayfrom the partially-embedded mole. The team executed the morepromising techniques on Mars. After diagnostic hammering onMars, the team decided to move the SSA to gain visibility ofthe mole’s configuration and access to the soil around the mole.After developing the technique and practicing the maneuver inthe InSight testbed, the team lifted the SSA on Mars and placedit behind the mole. This revealed a pit surrounding the nowexposed mole, observations of which provided essential cluesfor determining the root cause of the mole’s lack of progress.The IDS and Testbed teams altered the testbed to match thesituation on Mars. They devised IDA techniques to determinethe Martian soil properties and assist the mole’s descent. Theytested these techniques in the testbed and executed the more978-1-7281-2734-7/20/$31.00 c 2021 IEEE. Copyright 2020 CaliforniaInstitute of Technology. U.S. Government sponsorship acknowledged.promising ones on Mars. These include using the robotic arm toalter the regolith near the mole and to push on the mole while ithammers. This paper discusses the anomaly resolution testing inthe testbed at JPL, describes how the IDS team prepared for theanomaly recovery activities on Mars, and provides preliminaryresults of the efforts to assist the HP3 mole on Mars.

Kim, Junggon↗
NASA NTRS2020

Multibody Simulation of REMORA CubeSat Docking to and Pushing a Spent Rocket Booster

This paper details the multibody simulation of three phases of critical importance to the feasibility of the REMORA CubeSat space debris mitigation concept: the final approach of the CubeSat to a spent rocket booster; the grappling of the spent rocket booster using a robotic arm; and the pushing of the spent rocket booster to divert its course from another on-orbit asset. The extension of a robotic mobility and manipulation modeling toolkit (M3TK) from multibody dynamics simulation of manipulators and ground vehicles to simulation of orbital robotics is outlined. This includes the identification of the appropriate parameters required to concisely and generically describe thruster loads, thruster mixing, spacecraft control, and spacecraft navigation for the purpose of on-orbit robotics simulation. A high-level spacecraft navigator commands maneuvers to target spacecraft states. A PID spacecraft controller takes the target states and calculates desired forces and torques. A thruster mixer solves a quadratic program to determine the optimal thruster firing times for the propulsion system. Pulse width modulated actuation of eight canted cold gas thrusters is used in the simulated approach to a rocket nozzle from a distance of 200 m. A five degree of freedom robotic arm is controlled to position a pair of pincers to grasp the rocket nozzle. Contact dynamics are used to accurately simulate the grasping of the rocket nozzle by the pincers. A similar, but separate simulation is performed to assess the ability of the REMORA CubeSat to push the large spent rocket booster. This diversion maneuver makes use of an additional, larger thruster, and pushes the rocket booster in excess of 400 m. Appropriate motor control gains on the robotic arm are found to be higher during the pushing phase than those which are appropriate during free motion; this increase promotes rigidity of the arm and allows it to properly direct the pushing force. Challenges encountered in time step selection for numerical stability of the simulation are also discussed.

Mukherjee, Rudranarayan↗
NASA NTRS2020

A Robotically Assembled and Serviced Science Station for Earth Observations

In this paper we present the overall architecture of a ”Science Station”, a robotically assembled and serviced persistent platform that can host multiple payloads for Earth observations. Recent decadal survey findings motivate the need to have spatial and temporal concurrency in measurements from multiple instruments. We have architected the science station to simultaneously host up to twelve Earth Venture class instruments at a time. These instruments can be replaced by newer instruments periodically to take advantage of evolving science needs and technology capabilities. The Science Station can also concurrently host science, commercial, defense and other national interest payloads. The Science Station may provide a cost-effective paradigm by mitigating some of the risks and costs associated with multiple free-flyers that may otherwise be needed for the various instruments. It leverages emergent and existent technologies in robotic assembly and servicing, lower cost commercial launch vehicles, secondary launch vehicles, and rendezvous and proximity operations. In this paper, we report the findings of a survey we conducted on the desired performance of the Science Station from various instrument hosting perspectives. We report the various trade studies that we conducted to developed a feasible architecture that meets the goals of the Science Station while also meeting the constraints of a space system. We also report the various considerations in the configuration, thermal system, pointing system, overall concept of operations, and the robotic system of the Science Station architecture. The paper then describes a testbed activity we are undertaking to evaluate the supervised autonomy robotics needed for the Science Station as well as to conduct a riskreduction demonstration of the end-to-end robotics behaviors.

Mukherjee, Rudranarayan↗