Error Propagation Analysis, from LWR Assemblies to Plants, Using SCALE/Polaris-PARCS with the ENDF/B-VII.1 and VIII.0 AMPX 56-Group Libraries
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Engineering topics
Publications and source records attributed to Kim, Kang Seog.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The SCALE/Polaris–PARCS code procedure has been used in the confirmatory analysis for boiling water reactors by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. In this study, the SCALE/Polaris v6.3.0–PARCS v3.4.2 code procedure with the Evaluated Nuclear Data File (ENDF)/B-VII.1 AMPX 56-group library was validated by comparing the simulated results with the measured data for operating boiling water reactors, including Peach Bottom Unit 2 cycles 1–3, Hatch Unit 1 cycles 1–3, and Quad Cities Unit 1 cycles 1–3. The uncertainties and biases of the SCALE/Polaris–PARCS code package for boiling water reactor physics analysis were evaluated in the validation for key nuclear parameters such as reactivity and traversing in-core probe data.
This study was conducted to validate the SCALE/Polaris v6.3.0–PARCS v3.4.2 code procedure with the Evaluated Nuclear Data File (ENDF)/B-VII.1 AMPX 56-group library for pressurized water reactor (PWR) analysis, by comparing simulated results with measured data for critical experiments and operating PWRs. Uncertainties of the SCALE/Polaris–PARCS code procedure for PWR analysis were evaluated in the validation for the PWR key nuclear parameters such as critical boron concentrations, reactivity, control bank work, temperature coefficients, and pin and assembly power peaking factors.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
This is a collection of public data produced by AMPX or curated from quality sources that the SCALE code system relies on for user problem input.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Benchmark calculations for the Watts Bar Unit 1 cycles 1–3 were performed to validate the SCALE 6.3/Polaris–PARCS v3.4.2 with the ENDF/B-VII.1 56-group library by comparing the simulated results with the measured data. The benchmark results are used in evaluating uncertainties of the SCALE/Polaris–PARCS code package for pressurized water reactor physics analysis for key nuclear parameters such as reactivity, control bank worth, temperature coefficients, and pin and assembly power peaking factors. This report details plant and fuel design specifications and input data for SCALE/Polaris, GenPMAXS, and PARCS. Additional details are provided for the input and output files produced for the benchmark calculations. The benchmark results were summarized such that they can be used in evaluating uncertainties for key nuclear parameters with other benchmark results.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
As the nuclear energy industry considers ways to achieve improved economics in the current fleet of light-water reactors (LWRs), one possible approach is to operate each cycle longer. This causes a greater portion of the fuel to be burned and reduces the frequency of outages, which ultimately reduces the cost to operate the reactor. However, this also leads to higher burnup fuels than have traditionally been allowed in these reactors. There are concerns about integrity of high-burnup (HBu) fuel, especially during accident conditions such as loss-of-coolant accidents (LOCAs), as shown by Capps et al. To investigate these concerns, advanced modeling and simulation capabilities are under development to determine the susceptibility of HBu fuel to fuel fragmentation, relocation, and dispersion (FFRD). Improvements have previously been made to fuel performance capabilities to model these phenomena more accurately; multiphysics simulations have also been conducted to determine the power and burnup histories of the HBu fuel, which are needed as inputs to the fuel performance calculations. Most recently, new statistical approaches have been developed to identify a subset of fuel rods that have greater FFRD susceptibility, reducing the total number of fuel performance simulations required.
The MPACT neutronics module of the Virtual Environment for Reactor Analysis (VERA) has used the subgroup method for resonance self-shielding calculation, for which two-dimensional (2D) fixed-source transport calculations are performed using the method of characteristics for resonance energy groups. When considering thermal feedbacks, the subgroup calculation must be performed at each outer iteration. Therefore, the computing time for cross section processing is a significant burden for computational efficiency. The Dancoff-based Wigner-Seitz approximation (DWA) capability has been implemented into MPACT in conjunction with the subgroup method, which has been used in SCALE/XSProc since SCALE version 6.0 and has recently been called an equivalent Dancoff-factor cell (EDC) method. The issue of relatively large reactivity bias in DWA for the gadolinia rods was resolved by introducing multiple Dancoff factors. Benchmark results for the VERA pressurized and boiling water reactor benchmark suites show that the DWA capability would significantly enhance computational efficiency with comparable accuracy. (authors)