Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Klaehn, John R.

Publications and source records attributed to Klaehn, John R..

Thermally reflective membrane apparatuses, and related fluid treatment systems and methods

A thermally reflective membrane apparatus comprises a housing structure, and a thermally reflective membrane contained within the housing structure. The thermally reflective membrane comprises a semipermeable structure, and a porous, thermally reflective structure physically contacting the semipermeable structure. The porous, thermally reflective structure comprises discrete thermally reflective particles, and a binder material coupling the discrete thermally reflective particles to one another and the semipermeable structure. A fluid treatment system and method of treating a fluid are also described.

Klaehn, John R.↗

Molecular dynamics study of carbon dioxide and nitrogen selectivity through poly[bis((methoxyethoxy)ethoxy)phosphazene] (MEEP) membrane

Here, a molecular dynamics simulation model was developed to comprehensively understand carbon dioxide over nitrogen (CO 2 /N 2 ) selectivity through polyphosphazene-based membrane comprising of poly[bis((methoxyethoxy)ethoxy)phosphazene] (MEEP) selective layer at the molecular level. The effects of temperature, pressure, and initial feed gas composition on the CO 2 transport on a polymer membrane were studied. The computed free energy and density profile of the permeating gas mixture exhibited that CO 2 molecules express higher interactions with the membrane than N 2 molecules, resulting in higher CO 2 /N 2 selectivity. Statistical analysis of gas molecules (CO 2 , water (H 2 O), and N 2 ) transportation suggested that hydro- and CO 2 -philic functional groups in the membrane significantly impact CO 2 permeability and CO 2 /N 2 selectivity. This study suggested that Lewis acid–base and hydrogen bonding combinations contribute to CO 2 permeation and CO 2 /N 2 selectivity. An equal CO 2 /N 2 selectivity was observed with and without water vapor in the feed gas suggesting that water does not hinder CO 2 transport through the membrane.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Techno-economic analysis of carbon dioxide capture from low concentration sources using membranes

Rising carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) levels in the atmosphere lead to global warming, causing climate change. As such, carbon capture has become necessary to slow the increase and reduce CO 2 levels in the atmosphere. Point source emissions have a wide range of CO 2 concentrations, but emissions below 3% CO 2 have mostly been ignored because Carbon capture from these sources has been viewed as costly and economically unsustainable. Membrane technologies are considered the most viable solution by virtue of more energy-efficient operation. Our group at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) has developed poly[bis((2-methoxyethoxy)ethoxy)phosphazene] (MEEP)-based carbon dioxide selective membranes with CO 2 /N 2 selectivity greater than 40 and CO 2 permeability greater than 450 Barrer. To understand the economics of carbon capture, a spreadsheet-based techno-economic analysis (TEA) model was developed to consider multiple parameters, including selectivity and permeability of the membranes, performance conditions such as the number of stages, module material, electricity price, membrane price, and capital financing. The cost of carbon capture in US $\$$/metric ton was calculated at various purities and compared with other membrane processes, cryogenic capture, solvent-based capture, and pressure swing adsorption-based capture. It was determined that a MEEP-based three-stage process had a capture cost of US $\$$ 50.1/metric ton for 99.8% purity CO 2 from a 1% CO 2 feed source in nitrogen (N 2 ). In conclusion, the capture cost using the best performing Pebax-based membrane was 464% higher, cryogenic capture was 60%–140% higher, pressure swing adsorption was 55%–165% higher, and chemical absorption was -10%–110% higher than MEEP-based membrane capture, respectively.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

Electrochemical leaching of critical materials from lithium-ion batteries: A comparative life cycle assessment

The manufacturing of lithium-ion batteries (LIB) requires critical materials such as cobalt (Co) and lithium (Li) that are essential for clean-energy products including electric vehicles. Because of their rapidly increasing demand and limited supply, the recycle and reuse of these materials from end-of-life LIB have garnered a lot of interest. Electrochemical leaching has emerged as a sustainable method to extract critical materials out of LIBs, so life cycle assessment was conducted to compare the environmental impacts with traditional peroxide-based leaching and another emerging technology – SO 2 -based leaching. The results showed that electrochemical leaching reduces the global warming potential (GWP) by 80%-87% compared to peroxide-based leaching due to a lower acid consumption, avoidance of hydrogen peroxide, and regeneration of reducing agent iron (II) sulfate and compares well with SO 2 -based leaching in most impact categories. Furthermore, the analysis suggested renewable energy can further reduce the environment footprint of electrochemical leaching.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Removal of impurity Metals as Phosphates from Lithium-ion Battery leachates

Recovery of critical materials from end-of life (EOL) lithium-ion batteries (LIB) is gaining interest as demands for materials grows. Hydrometallurgical processes start with an intermediate product known as black mass which contains critical materials of interest (Co, Ni, Li, and graphite) as well as impurities such as Cu, Al, and Fe. These impurities are deleterious to downstream separation processes, as well as impact functionality of the final products. Here, these impurities effectively compete with most solvent extraction (SX) and metal recovery processes to diminish the overall yields of the desired materials. In this work, a process flowsheet is presented where a previously reported electrochemical leaching (ECL) process is followed by selective precipitation using diammonium hydrogen phosphate (DAP) to remove Cu, Al, and Fe from LIB leachate solutions. The electrochemical leach process removes Cu and produces a pH-adjusted leachate, ca. pH 2, without requiring an extra Cu extraction step. The addition of the precipitant DAP to leachate by slightly adjusting the pH to 3–4 at 45 °C, precipitates 95–99% of Al and Fe as their phosphates and the leachate retains >95% of Co, Ni and Li. After the filtration of phosphate impurities, the solution is ready for further processing, such as SX. As an unexpected result from the leachate processing, 20–30% of the Ni and Co co-crystalize as the double salt after cooling to room temperature, which could provide a shorter route to their recovery.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Electrification and decarbonization of spent Li-ion batteries purification by using an electrochemical membrane reactor

The expanding electric vehicle market brings with it exponential growth in the use of lithium (Li)-ion batteries (LIB) for which a wave of spent LIB is expected to come within the next 5 to 10 years. Due to the economic and strategic value imbedded within the metals contained in LIB, different recycling technologies, including hydrometallurgy, pyrometallurgy and direct recycling, are under development. Being different from previous hydrometallurgical methods, which may have high chemical consumption and negative environmental impact, an electrochemical membrane reactor is designed and validated for the first time, to electrify and decarbonize the impurity removal process. This reactor electroplates copper (Cu) and electrochemically precipitates aluminum (Al) and iron (Fe) from simulated spent LIB leachates, by consuming only air, water, and electricity, and the impurities are reduced to <1 ppm. The purified leachate maintains 99.5 % of the nickel (Ni), 95.4 % of the cobalt (Co) and 99.14 % of manganese (Mn) from the original leachate solution, and then can be directly applied for cathode precursor synthesis. Additionally, the purification process doesn’t introduce extra impurity, and the reactor restoration process generates valuable by-product hydro sulfate (H2SO4). This electrochemical process can reduce the cost, because of the much less chemical consumption and the valuable by-product generation, and mitigates the waste emissions, because of no extra impurity introduced and no greenhouse gas (GHG) produced. In conclusion, the chemical precipitation method uses significant amount of NaOH, which induced GHG emission during the manufacturing process.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Separation of isoprene from biologically-derived gas streams

Renewable organic precursors, including olefinic compounds such as isoprene, have attracted interest from the polymer and pharmaceutical industries. Biologically-derived processes can generate these target compounds; however, their gaseous product streams are complex mixtures of condensable organic vapors (COVs), water vapor, carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), and/or nitrogen (N 2 ). Because COVs, CO 2 and water vapor are known to alter polymer membranes, mixed gas separations data at ambient and elevated temperatures are limited. Here, this study focused on two classes of polymer membranes, glassy [polyetherimide (Ultem®)] and a rubbery [polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)] with results indicating that isoprene separation is possible in humidified gas environment (2–4 vol% water). Gas permeabilities of these membranes did not noticeably change in the presence of humidity; however, the selectivity of these membranes was significantly lower compared to their performance under dry conditions. The role of water vapor in gas transport was derived from the energy of activation of permeation (E p ) for PDMS and Ultem® from 30–80°C in humidified mixed gas streams. For both polymers, E p data shows a slight decrease in selectivity with the other gases (hydrogen, N 2 , CO 2 , and methane) at elevated temperatures in the presence of water vapor. Thus, these COVs separations are feasible with polymer membranes in the presence of humidified gas streams, even in the case of glassy and rubbery membranes in series.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Separation of cobalt, nickel, and manganese in leach solutions of waste lithium-ion batteries using Dowex M4195 ion exchange resin

Current methods to separate and recover critical metals from waste lithium-ion battery (LIB) scrap require multiple unit operations that involve selective leaching and a combination of separation methods. These methods include impurity removal, solvent extraction, ion exchange, and precipitation, to achieve high purity Co and Ni products. In this paper an efficient extraction strategy was developed to individually separate Ni and Co from a LIB leachate that was generated from an electrochemical leaching process. By using Dowex M4195 resin, as the only method of separation, additional impurity removal operations were not needed. After loading and eluting, three different fractions were obtained: 99.0% Ni concentrate, 98.5% Co concentrate, and a Li/Mn rich concentrate allowing the separation of Ni, Co and Mn. Here, the developed process is then presented as an alternative for metal recovery from leachates from scrap LIBs with minimum chemical addition and pH adjustment.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Methods of recovering rare earth elements

A method of recovering a rare earth element. The method comprises dissolving a rare earth element magnetic material in a dissolution organic solvent and a β-diketone compound to form a dissolved rare earth element mixture. A rare earth element of the rare earth element magnetic material and the β-diketone compound are reacted to form a β-diketonate chelate complex and the dissolution organic solvent is removed. The β-diketonate chelate complex is removed using a separation organic solvent, and the β-diketonate chelate complex is recovered. Additional methods are also disclosed.

Klaehn, John R.↗

Electrochemical-assisted leaching of active materials from lithium ion batteries

The development of a circular economy for lithium-ion batteries (LIB) is essential to realize decarbonization and an electrified energy market. However, the current commercial operations that recover valuable constituents from LIBs require significant energy and reagents, which create toxic emissions and additional waste. We report an electrochemical-based method for leaching valuable metals from the active materials of mixed shredded LIBs. In this process, the use electrons, as green reagent, allows the use and regeneration of Fe 2+ in low concentrations as substitute for hydrogen peroxide as a reducing agent. Leaching in a membrane separated two-compartment electrochemical cell contributes to decrease the acid requirements as H+ can be generated electrochemically. With this design, leaching efficiencies over 96% for the active metals (Li, Co, Mn, and Ni) were demonstrated at pulp densities up to 240 g/L. Copper present in the active material is electrowon and recovered separately. Preliminary cost analyses demonstrate ca. 80% reduction in energy and chemical costs as compared to traditional hydrometallurgical routes.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗