Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Knehr, Kevin W.

Publications and source records attributed to Knehr, Kevin W..

Impact of Different Thermal Gradients on the Dynamics of Cylindrical Lithium-ion Cells Subject to Accelerated Aging and on Module Performance

This study investigates the impacts of applying different thermal gradient patterns to cylindrical lithium-ion cells in a module on cell dynamics (temperatures, current flows, state of charge), module performance (evolution of resistance, capacity, and energy versus cycle number), and module lifetime. The thermal gradients were generated using cooling plates (CPs) with three different flow-field designs, namely, straight, perpendicular, and U-turn. The study uses computational fluid dynamics (CFD), the pseudo-two-dimensional (P2D) battery model, capacity loss and increased impedance due to the growth of a solid-electrolyte-interphase, and the electric current distribution from module terminals to cells that depends on the series-parallel electrical connections among the cells. The impact of the thermal gradient (resulting from the CP designs) on the variability in resistance, current, state of charge, and voltage among the cells was analyzed and linked to differences in the module's performance. Applying a thermal gradient to parallel-connected strings of series-connected cells led to variation in the current through each parallel string and an imbalance in the voltage of series-connected cells. Module performance is poorer when the thermal gradient causes a voltage imbalance than when it causes a current imbalance. Module performance becomes the worst when both current variation and voltage imbalance happen together. For instance, the module's lifetime (estimated as reaching 80% of its initial capacity) varied by 5% to 17.5%, depending on the magnitude and pattern of the imposed thermal gradient. As the relative orientation between thermal gradients and cells' electrical connectivity influences the module's performance, appropriate consideration should be given to the choice of the CP, especially if large thermal gradients are allowed.

Battery thermal management↗

A New Analytical Expression for Estimating the Adiabatic Temperature Rise in Lithium-Ion Batteries During High-Power Pulses

A coupled, thermal-electrochemical model is used to explain why the Joule heating assumption (i.e., I 2 R) does not provide a good representation of the temperature rise during high power pulses in lithium-ion batteries, even in cases where the reversible heat generation can be neglected. The poor agreement occurs because the internal resistance changes during the pulse due to the opposing effects of mass transport in the electrolyte, which raises the resistance, and heat generation (temperature rise), which lowers the resistance. These insights are used to propose a new analytical expression for predicting the temperature rise during adiabatic pulses with limited experimental and physical data. The expression accounts for thermal effects using a Taylor series expansion of an Arrhenius-type equation. It accounts for transport effects using an approximate solution to the one-dimensional diffusion equation. The new expression is shown to accurately estimate the simulated, adiabatic temperature rise across a range of loadings (1 to 4 mAh cm -2 ) and C-rates (1C to 10C) for cells containing LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.3 Co 0.2 O 2 positive electrodes and graphite negative electrodes. In conclusion, it is also shown to accurately estimate the experimental, adiabatic temperature rise measured for cells with LiFePO 4 positive electrodes and mesocarbon negative electrodes with minimal changes to the fitted parameters.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

The influence of temperature on area-specific impedance and capacity of Li-ion cells with nickel-containing positive electrodes

The temperature-dependent behaviors of five nickel-containing positive electrodes (NCA, NMC811, NMC622, NMC532, and NMC111) in lithium-ion batteries are investigated using an electrochemical protocol involving rate studies, mild aging (~100 cycles), and hybrid pulse power characterization (HPPC). Tests are conducted using coin-cells with graphite negative electrodes at -20 °C, 0 °C, 20 °C, and 40 °C. Three techniques are compared for determining the area-specific impedance (ASI): i) fits to the rate study average voltages, ii) fitting to the entire voltage curves using a regularization scheme, and iii) HPPC. When fit to an Arrhenius-type equation, all methods yield similar apparent activation energies (±2 kJ/mol) for the impedance, which range from -20 to -31 kJ/mol for the electrodes. Impedance growth increases with temperature but remains at less than 0.2% per cycle for most electrodes and temperatures. NCA and NMC811 are the exceptions, which yield 0.5% and 1.5% increases in ASI per cycle, respectively, at 40 °C. For cells with the same electrodes, the capacities are similar at 20 and 40 °C but reduce at lower temperatures, with up to a 52% reduction at -20 °C and 2C. The fade in energy of the cells during C/3 cycling is attributed to decreasing capacity as opposed to increasing ASI.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Battery Performance and Cost Modeling for Electric-Drive Vehicles (A Manual for BatPaC v5.0)

This manual details the fifth version of the Battery Performance and Cost (BatPaC v5.0) model developed at Argonne National Laboratory for lithium-ion battery packs used in transportation (file “BatPaC 5.0 2022-07-22.xlsm”). BatPaC is a publicly available model that performs a bottom-up lithium-ion battery design and cost calculation. The model designs the battery for a specified power, energy, and vehicle type (i.e., hybrid, plug-in hybrid, or full-electric). The cost of the designed battery is calculated by accounting for every step in the lithium-ion battery manufacturing process. The original model and manual were publicly peer-reviewed by battery experts assembled by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. This revised model and manual include changes made in response to comments received from users and the observed trajectory of the industry.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Pathways towards managing cost and degradation risk of fast charging cells with electrical and thermal controls

The charging rate of Li-ion batteries is limited by the risks of lithium plating and thermal damage, both of which negatively affect lifetime of the batteries. This work analyzes how to minimize charge time and manage the risk of degradation using both electrical and thermal controls. To accomplish this, an electrochemical-thermal model is developed to introduce a constant-risk fast charging protocol which maximizes the charging current while maintaining the cell within pre-defined design limits selected to minimize the risk of degradation. Results indicate 80%-charging of a typical NMC/graphite cell can be achieved within 10 minutes with a cell cost under $100 kW –1 h –1 (corresponding to an 80 μm thick anode) when charged at moderate allowable risks of degradation. Here, we also demonstrate how stretching the allowable risk (i.e., higher temperatures, larger C-rates, and lower anode potential limits) allows affordable design of fast charging cells.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Comparing total cost of ownership of battery electric vehicles and internal combustion engine vehicles

The technological advance of electrochemical energy storage and the electric powertrain has led to rapid growth in the deployment of electric vehicles. The high cost and the added weight of the batteries have limited the size (energy storage capacity) and, therefore, the driving range of these vehicles. However, consumers are steadily purchasing these vehicles because of the fast acceleration, quiet ride, and high energy efficiency. The higher pack-to-wheel efficiency and the lower energy cost per mile, as well as the lower expense for maintenance and repair, translate to operating savings over conventional vehicles. Here we compare battery electric vehicles with internal combustion engine vehicles based on the total cost of ownership. It is seen that the higher initial cost of electric vehicles can be recovered in as little as 5 years. This is especially true for electric vehicles with shorter driving ranges. Specifically, a vehicle with an electric driving range under 200 miles may achieve cost parity with an equivalent internal combustion engine vehicle in 8 years or less.

33 ADVANCED PROPULSION SYSTEMS↗