Engineering topics
Knight, Russell
Publications and source records attributed to Knight, Russell.
Area Coverage Planning with 3-axis Steerable, 2D Framing Sensors
Existing algorithms for Agile Earth Observing Satellites((Lemaitre et al. 2002)) were largely created for 1D line sensors that acquire images in linear swaths. However, imaging satellites increasingly use 2D framing sensors (cameras) that capture discrete rectangular images. We describe tiling step-stare approaches that are more suited to rectangular image footprints than are 1D swath-based algorithms. Optimal area planning for these 2D framing instruments is an NPcomplete problem and intractable for large areas, so we present four approximation algorithms. Strategies are compared against a prior 2D framing instrument algorithm (Knight 2014) in three computational experiments. The impact of observer agility on schedule makespan is examined. Makespans vary more as observer agility decreases toward a critical point, then vary less after the critical point, suggesting a possible problem phase transition.
Algorithms for area coverage planning with 3-axis steerable, 2D framing sensors
UNKNOWN
Heuristic Area Cost Estimation for Observational Coverage Schedulers
This paper presents a comparison of heuris- tics used to estimate the amount of time it would take for a spacecraft to image an area using Boustrophedon decomposition (Choset and Pignon 1998). Machine learning tech- niques are used to characterize algorithmic performance of coverage algorithms. It is shown that an ordinary least-squares linear model is among the most accurate in a set of constant and linear order regression models both in terms of memory consumption and schedule duration. These are demonstrated using the ASPEN planning system (Fukunaga et al. 1997) on the Eagle Eye domain.
A Hybrid Traveling Salesman Problem - Squeaky Wheel Optimization Planner for Earth Observational Scheduling
We outline a hybrid planner for scheduling Observa- tion Requests on an Earth observing satellite, subject to a variety of constraints for the ASPEN (Chien et al. 2000) Eagle Eye adaptation (Knight, Donnellan, and Green 2013) that combines Squeaky Wheel Optimiza- tion (Joslin and Clements 1999) with sliding observa- tion planning (Aldinger et al. 2013). The Earth Ob- serving Satellite (EOS) planning problem (Globus et al. 2004) is reformulated as time-varying travel time TSP with interval constraints (Ichoua, Gendreau, and Potvin 2003). The replanning/ ll stage of the hybrid scheduler marginally improves schedule quality for all bus agilities examined, but has more impact on lower agility observers. The squeaky wheel stage primarily a ects overall schedule quality by satisfying high pri- ority requests, while the replanner reduces starvation of lower value requests.
Automated Scheduling of Personnel to Staff Operations for the Mars Science Laboratory
Leveraging previous work on scheduling personnel for space mission operations, we have adapted ASPEN (Activity Scheduling and Planning Environment) [1] to the domain of scheduling personnel for operations of the Mars Science Laboratory. Automated scheduling of personnel is not new. We compare our representations to a sampling of employee scheduling systems available with respect to desired features. We described the constraints required by MSL personnel schedulers and how each is handled by the scheduling algorithm.
Automating Stowage Operations for the International Space Station
No abstract available
Automating Stowage Operations for the International Space Station
A challenge for any proposed mission is to demonstrate convincingly that the proposed systems will in fact deliver the science promised. Funding agencies and mission design personnel are becoming ever more skeptical of the abstractions that form the basis of the current state of the practice with respect to approximating science return. To address this, we have been using automated planning and scheduling technology to provide actual coverage campaigns that provide better predictive performance with respect to science return for a given mission design and set of mission objectives given implementation uncertainties. Specifically, we have applied an adaptation of ASPEN and SPICE to the Eagle-Eye domain that demonstrates the performance of the mission design with respect to coverage of science imaging targets that address climate change and disaster response. Eagle-Eye is an Earth-imaging telescope that has been proposed to fly aboard the International Space Station (ISS).
Mission Design Evaluation Using Automated Planning for High Resolution Imaging of Dynamic Surface Processes from the ISS
No abstract available
Mission Design Evaluation Using Automated Planning for High Resolution Imaging of Dynamic Surface Processes from the ISS
A challenge for any proposed mission is to demonstrate convincingly that the proposed systems will in fact deliver the science promised. Funding agencies and mission design personnel are becoming ever more skeptical of the abstractions that form the basis of the current state of the practice with respect to approximating science return. To address this, we have been using automated planning and scheduling technology to provide actual coverage campaigns that provide better predictive performance with respect to science return for a given mission design and set of mission objectives given implementation uncertainties. Specifically, we have applied an adaptation of ASPEN and SPICE to the Eagle-Eye domain that demonstrates the performance of the mission design with respect to coverage of science imaging targets that address climate change and disaster response. Eagle-Eye is an Earth-imaging telescope that has been proposed to fly aboard the International Space Station (ISS).