Engineering topics

Koch, L. C.

Publications and source records attributed to Koch, L. C..

5 records

NASA NTRS2001

The NO(x)-HNO3 System in the Lower Stratosphere: Insights from In Situ Measurements and Implications of the J(HNO3)-[OH] Relationship

During the 1997 Photochemistry of Ozone Loss in the Arctic Region in Summer (POLARIS) mission, simultaneous in situ observations of NOx and HOx radicals, their precursors, and the radiation field were obtained in the lower stratosphere. We use these observations to evaluate the primary mechanisms that control NOx-HNO3 exchange and to understand their control over the partitioning between NO2 and HNO3 in regions of continuous sunlight. We calculate NOx production (PNOx) and loss (LNOx) in a manner directly constrained by the in situ measurements and current rate constant recommendations, using approaches for representing albedo, overhead O3 and [OH] that reduce model uncertainty. We find a consistent discrepancy of 18% between modeled rates of NOx production and loss (LNOx = 1.18P(sub NOx)), which is within the measurement uncertainty of +/- 27%. The partitioning between NOx production processes is [HNO3 + OH (41 +/- 2)%; HNO3 + hv (59 +/- 2)%] and between NOx loss processes is [NO2 + OH, 90% to >97%; BrONO2 + H2O, 10% to <3%]. The steady-state description of NOx-HNO3 exchange reveals the significant influence of the tight correlation between the photolysis rate of HNO3 and [OH] established by in situ measurements throughout the lower stratosphere. Parametrizing this relationship, we find: (1) the steady-state value of [NO2](sub 24h-avg)/[HNO3] in the continuously sunlit, lower stratosphere is a function only of temperature and number density; and (2) the partitioning of NOx production between HNO3 + OH and HNO3 + hv is nearly constant throughout most of the lower stratosphere. We describe a methodology (functions of latitude, day, temperature, and pressure) for accurately predicting the steady-state value of [NO2](sub 24h-avg)/[HNO3] and the partitioning of NOx production within these regions. The results establish a metric to compare observations of [NO2](sub 24h-avg)/[HNO3] within the continuously sunlit region and provide a simple diagnostic for evaluating the accuracy of models that attempt to describe the coupled NOx-HOx photochemistry in the lower stratosphere.

Perkins, K. K.↗

NASA NTRS1999

The Coupling of ClONO2, ClO, and NO2 in the Lower Stratosphere From in Situ Observations Using the NASA ER-2 Aircraft

The first in situ measurements of ClONO2 in the lower stratosphere, acquired using the NASA ER-2 aircraft during the Polar Ozone Loss in the Arctic Region in Summer (POLARIS) mission, are combined with simultaneous measurements of ClO, NO2, temperature, pressure, and the calculated photolysis rate coefficient (J(sub ClONO2)) to examine the balance between production and loss of ClONO2. The observations demonstrate the ClONO2 photochemical steady state measurement, [ClONO2](sup PSS) = k[ClO][No2]/J(sub ClONO2), is in good agreement with the direct measurement, [ClONO2](sup MEAS). For the bulk of the data (80%), where T > 220 K and latitudes > 45 N, [ClONO2](sup PPS) = 1.15 +/- 0.36(1-sigma)[ClONO2](sup MEAS), while for T< 220 K and latitudes < 45 N, the result is somewhat less at 1.01 +/- 0.30. The cause of the temperature and/or latitude trend is unidentified. These results are independent of solar zenith angle and air density, thus there is no evidence in support of a pressure-dependent quantum yield for photodissociation of ClONO2 at wavelengths > 300 nm. These measurements confirm the mechanism by which active nitrogen (NOx = NO + NO2) controls the abundance of active chlorine (Clx = ClO + Cl) in the stratosphere.

Stimpfle, R. E.↗

NASA NTRS1979

Hypersonic airframe structures: Technology needs and flight test requirements

Hypersonic vehicles, that may be produced by the year 2000, were identified. Candidate thermal/structural concepts that merit consideration for these vehicles were described. The current status of analytical methods, materials, manufacturing techniques, and conceptual developments pertaining to these concepts were reviewed. Guidelines establishing meaningful technology goals were defined and twenty-eight specific technology needs were identified. The extent to which these technology needs can be satisfied, using existing capabilities and facilities without the benefit of a hypersonic research aircraft, was assessed. The role that a research aircraft can fill in advancing this technology was discussed and a flight test program was outlined. Research aircraft thermal/structural design philosophy was also discussed. Programs, integrating technology advancements with the projected vehicle needs, were presented. Program options were provided to reflect various scheduling and cost possibilities.

Stone, J. E.↗

NASA NTRS1978

High heat flux actively cooled honeycomb sandwich structural panel for a hypersonic aircraft

The results of a program to design and fabricate an unshielded actively cooled structural panel for a hypersonic aircraft are presented. The design is an all-aluminum honeycomb sandwich with embedded cooling passages soldered to the inside of the outer moldline skin. The overall finding is that an actively cooled structure appears feasible for application on a hypersonic aircraft, but the fabrication process is complex and some material and manufacturing technology developments are required. Results from the program are summarized and supporting details are presented.

Koch, L. C.↗

NASA NTRS1978

Design and fabrication of a radiative actively cooled honeycomb sandwich panel

The mass of a radiative actively cooled panel was compared to the mass of a bare actively cooled panel designed to the same conditions and constraints. The approach was to design and optimize a 0.61 x 6.1 m full scale panel which combines radiative and active cooling to control structural temperatures to levels compatible with use of lightweight materials and to fabricate a 0.61 x 1.22 m panel for performance testing. Results of the design and optimization of the full scale radiative actively cooled structural panel, including radiative concept selection, final configuration details, test panel description, and conclusions are summarized.

Koch, L. C.↗