Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Kolaini, Ali R.

Publications and source records attributed to Kolaini, Ali R..

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2019

Development of a new method in force limited vibration testing

The force limited vibration test approaches discussed in NASA-HDBK-7004C were developed to reduce overtesting associated with base shake vibration tests of aerospace hardware. This handbook outlines several different methods of specifying force limiting specifications. The basis for deriving force limiting specifications is related to the differences between mechanical impedances of typical aerospace hardware interfacing the mounting structures in flight configurations and the large impedances inherent in shaker vibration testing. Among these approaches, the semi-empirical method is presently the most widely used method to derive the force limiting specifications. This method is developed based on the assumption that the hardware interface responses are coherently excited. The inclusion of the incoherent excitation of the aerospace structures at mounting interfaces provides the basis for developing a more realistic force limiting specification that may be used to qualify flight hardware for launch environments using shaker testing. In this paper the semi-empirical method for defining force limiting specifications discussed in NASA handbook are reviewed using data recently obtained from a series of acoustic and vibration tests. A mathematical formation of a new force limiting approach based on considering the incoherent excitation of the hardware at their mounting interfaces is developed. Results from the analysis, which are correlated to the data obtained from a series of well instrumented acoustic and vibration tests, are discussed. The new approach provides much more realistic force limits that may further remove conservatism inherent in shaker vibration testing not accounted for by methods discussed in the NASA handbook.

Kolaini, Ali R.↗
NASA NTRS2018

Observations on Dynamic Qualification Testing of a Component with Nonlinear Deadband Interfaces

Typical flight hardware dynamic qualification tests exhibit nearly linear structural response when exposed to acceleration inputs from low to full qualification levels. Even in these “linear” cases, there is typically a trend of increasing damping with test levels. The nonlinear mechanism behind this increase in energy dissipation well understood – typically stick/slip hysteresis at joint connections. This paper is concerned with a different type of nonlinearity: deadbands at structural interfaces. Deadband nonlinearities can have a significant influence on structural response and modal/spectral characteristics which can present difficulties in test, analysis, and structural certification. This subject nonlinear behaviour is observed during flight qualification testing of the AQUARIUS instrument and discussed here. Simple physical reasoning and analytical model is utilized to explain the behaviour which is consistent with the test findings.

Majed, Arya↗
NASA NTRS2016

Spacecraft Vibration Testing: Benefits and Potential Issues

JPL has traditionally performed system level vibration testing of flight spacecraft. The benefits and potential issues of fully assembled flight spacecraft vibration testing are discussed herein. The following specific topics, which may be complementary to the special session on “Virtual Vibration Testing,” are discussed: spacecraft workmanship, functional and structural integrity testing to uncover workmanship problems, force- and moment-limited vibration testing, potential issues with structural frequency identification using base shake test data, and several failures related to vibration shaker testing. The information provided in this paper is complementary to the special session on “Virtual Shaker Testing,’ and attention is given to issues that virtual shaker testing may face.

Kolaini, Ali R.↗
NASA NTRS2016

Development of Multi-Physics Dynamics Models for High-Frequency Large-Amplitude Structural Response Simulation

An analytic approach is demonstrated to reveal potential pyroshock-driven dynamic effects causing power losses in the Thermo-Electric (TE) module bars of the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) Multi-Mission Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator (MMRTG). This study utilizes high-fidelity finite element analysis with SIERRA/PRESTO codes to estimate wave propagation effects due to large-amplitude suddenly-applied pyro shock loads in the MMRTG. A high fidelity model of the TE module bar was created with approximately 30 million degrees-of-freedom (DOF). First, a quasi-static preload was applied on top of the TE module bar, then transient tri-axial acceleration inputs were simultaneously applied on the preloaded module. The applied input acceleration signals were measured during MMRTG shock qualification tests performed at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. An explicit finite element solver in the SIERRA/PRESTO computational environment, along with a 3000 processor parallel super -computing framework at NASA AMES, was used for the simulation. The simulation results were investigated both qualitatively and quantitatively. The predicted shock wave propagation results provide detailed structural responses throughout the TE module bar, and key insights into the dynamic response (i.e., loads, displacements, accelerations) of critical internal spring/piston compression systems, TE materials, and internal component interfaces in the MMRTG TE module bar. They also provide confidence on the viability of this high-fidelity modeling scheme to accurately predict shock wave propagation patterns within complex structures. This analytic approach is envisioned for modeling shock sensitive hardware susceptible to intense shock environments positioned near shock separation devices in modern space vehicles and systems.

Shock Waves↗
NASA NTRS2015

Advanced Computational Modeling Approaches for Shock Response Prediction

Motivation: (1) The activation of pyroshock devices such as explosives, separation nuts, pin-pullers, etc. produces high frequency transient structural response, typically from few tens of Hz to several hundreds of kHz. (2) Lack of reliable analytical tools makes the prediction of appropriate design and qualification test levels a challenge. (3) In the past few decades, several attempts have been made to develop methodologies that predict the structural responses to shock environments. (4) Currently, there is no validated approach that is viable to predict shock environments overt the full frequency range (i.e., ~100 Hz to 10 kHz). Scope: (1) Model, analyze, and interpret space structural systems with complex interfaces and discontinuities, subjected to shock loads. (2) Assess the viability of a suite of numerical tools to simulate transient, non-linear solid mechanics and structural dynamics problems, such as shock wave propagation.

Derkevorkian, Armen↗
NASA NTRS2014

Impact of Acoustic Standing Waves on Structural Responses

For several decades large reverberant chambers and most recently direct field acoustic testing have been used in the aerospace industry to test larger structures with low surface densities such as solar arrays and reflectors to qualify them and to detect faults in the design and fabrication. It has been reported that in reverberant chamber and direct acoustic testing, standing acoustic modes may strongly couple with the fundamental structural modes of the test hardware (Reference 1). In this paper results from a recent reverberant chamber acoustic test of a composite reflector are discussed. These results provide further convincing evidence of the acoustic standing wave and structural modes coupling phenomenon. The purpose of this paper is to alert test organizations to this phenomenon so that they can account for the potential increase in structural responses and ensure that flight hardware undergoes safe testing. An understanding of the coupling phenomenon may also help minimize the over and/or under testing that could pose un-anticipated structural and flight qualification issues.

Reverberant acoustic field↗