Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Korey, Matt

Publications and source records attributed to Korey, Matt.

Wind Turbine Blade Repurposing and Recycling: Coupling Repurposing Methods with 3D Printing Technology

Fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites continue to be implemented in several marketsbecause of their strength capacity and light weight. Especially in the wind industry, wind bladesare made of this material which makes them ideal for wind energy generation, but bladesbecome a problem at end-of-life. Because recycling thermoplastic composites technologiesare still not cost and environmentally effective, research in this space is needed. This paperpresents a case study for coupling repurposed wind turbine blades and 3D printing technology.The purpose is to remanufacture decommissioned wind blades into bus stop roof and seatingsections to then use recycled glass fiber from a decommissioned wind turbine blade to 3Dprint structural and/or fixtures needed in the assembly. We provide an overview of the designprocess, and the development process steps in repurposing and 3D printing the material,delving into key parameters required for a successful implementation.

Henao, Yulizza↗

Development of wind turbine blade recycling baselines in the United States

Over the past several years, the wind energy industry has received scrutiny regarding wind turbine blade (WTB) recycling due to the landfilling of WTBs caused by a lack of industrially viable recycling solutions. The amount of WTBs that will need to be recycled is set to increase in the United States as the deployment of wind energy is expected to rapidly grow to meet the nation's energy goals by 2035. While significant progress has been made worldwide, it is still unclear which WTB recycling solutions would be the most cost and energy effective within the United States for the existing fleet of wind turbines. To guide researchers and industry with a clear path forward, a range of options for WTB recycling in the United States are modeled through development of baseline scenarios and the use of formal life cycle assessment (LCA). Model data have been collected through literature review, industry engagement, and expert opinion regarding current end of life practices and considerations surrounding equipment, labor, and logistics. A detailed baseline for WTB decommissioning processes has been developed and used to assess alternative approaches, such as on-site shredding to compare the impacts on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The developed LCA model and baseline scenarios for WTB recycling is used to assess the current WTB decommissioning practices in the United States along with emerging recycling pathways, including cement kiln co-processing and pyrolysis. Initial findings indicate that there are different approaches to decommissioning WTBs in the United States, each of which has unique implications for recycling. In light of this finding, additional results from the modeling will be used to better understand decommissioning practices and assist in making educated decisions on recycling pathways for the future. Throughout the analysis, focus was given to where international efforts might differ from the United States. WTB recycling is occurring worldwide, and different countries have different drivers for creating markets for recycled WTB materials. The contrasts and similarities between the United States and other countries offer insight to areas of opportunity that the United States could investigate and areas that can be readily transferred from existing solutions. By modeling and characterizing the current decommissioning practices and potential recycling solutions for the United States, a clearer vision will be created for pathways forward as to how to handle end of life WTBs to enable more efficient and cost-effective opportunities for material recovery from end-of-life WTBs.

Korey, Matt↗

Material Goals Towards Equity Along the STEM and LGBTQIA+ Spectra

Materials Science and Engineering (MSE) is an exciting interdisciplinary field that promises to secure an understanding of materials underpin technologies that enable modern life. We often champion the properties of the materials we study, we must remember that these advances are afforded by the people ‘behind’ the research and applications. This warrants us to consider the impact of our academic & industrial research climate, and whether there is equal access/support to participate. As such, this article focusses on disparities for members of the LGBTQIA+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual, and more) community. Furthermore, we hope to support actions that create a more equitable community, where there is a sense of inclusion and belonging and power shared amongst LGBTQIA+ and non-LGBTQIA+ identifying individuals.

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗