Preparation of Specimens and Samples for the U.S. National Nuclear Materials Archive
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Krichinsky, Alan↗
Engineering topics
Krichinsky, Alan
Publications and source records attributed to Krichinsky, Alan.
Safeguards Technology for Thorium Fuel Cycles: Research and Development Needs Assessment and Recommendations
This report presents Safeguards Technology for Thorium Fuel Cycles: Research and Development Needs Assessment and Recommendations prepared for the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Office of Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Research and Development (DNN R&D) Safeguards Program by a multilaboratory team from Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Los Alamos National Laboratory, and Y-12 National Security Complex. It documents key findings of a 2-year scoping study on “Safeguards Technology Needs Assessment for Leading Thorium Fuel Cycles” (project OR18-V-SG Tec Needs Th Fuel Cycles-PD1Lb).
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
Safeguards Challenges and Safeguards Technology Needs Assessment for Leading Thorium Fuel Cycles
Several thorium fuel cycle variants are currently being actively pursued by the global nuclear energy community. These variants have short-, medium-, and long-term deployment pathways in a variety of reactor types, including thorium-fueled molten salt reactors. Those pathways in turn give rise to a variety of fuel designs, fuel cycle facilities, and nuclear material processing requirements. These emerging fuel cycles will impact the technical implementation of safeguards, and they already raise questions about the applicability of current verification technologies. To address this issue, research is being performed to produce a detailed safeguards technology road map. It will include a needs assessment of the detection research and development (R&D;) necessary to transition the current safeguards technology toolkit to meet the verification needs of thorium fuel cycles, and to formulate the scientific basis for building new instrumentation to fill any potential capability gaps. The purpose of this technology road map is to define and inform on the safeguards technology needs for thorium fuel cycles, reflecting only the leading candidate thorium fuel cycles prioritized based on implementation timescales and the current direction of international programs. This work provides a guide to the priorities for future directed R&D; needed to bring the technology readiness levels (TRLs) of safeguards detection solutions in line with the higher TRLs of the most promising thorium fuel cycles. Herein, a summary is presented of thorium fuel cycle options and activities currently under way worldwide, which provides the technical basis for the needs evaluation. The key synergies and differences between these fuel cycles and current conventional uranium- and plutonium-based fuel cycles will be discussed from a nuclear material accountancy and detection standpoint. Reactor inventory calculations, fuel cycle simulations, and conclusions from the safeguards technology needs assessment will be presented, together with plans for experimental validation.
Worrall, Louise G.↗
Algorithm for Establishing Safeguards Termination Concentration Limits
This paper presents an algorithm for estimating the maximum concentration limits for terminating safeguards on nuclear materials. These limits are important because such material is no longer subject to accounting, reporting or inspections after the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has approved the termination of safeguards on nuclear material declared by a State to be waste.Maximum concentration limits for different waste forms generated within nuclear fuel cycle facilities must be sufficiently conservative such that termination of safeguards does not become a weak link in the safeguards system. The concentration limits must also remain practical in order to ensure IAEA resources are used effectively and efficiently to implement safeguards in the State. These termination limits should be technically-based while remaining objective and reasonable to implement by the State. In support of the original IAEA guidance on concentration limits for termination of safeguards prepared in the early 1990s, the U.S. developed an algorithm to estimate concentrations that would make recovery of nuclear material from waste on which safeguards had been terminated at least as unattractive as undeclared production from uranium ore or diversion of similar nuclear material. In 2016, the IAEA sought technical advice from a meeting of experts from selected member States to support updating its internal guidance on termination of safeguards. Their recommendations included extending the guidance to consider additional waste forms. The experts in the 2016 meeting recommended that the IAEA limits should more clearly reflect the technical difficulty and level of effort required to recover nuclear material from the various waste forms. This paper identifies and assesses the most likely techniques a State might use to recover nuclear material from the waste forms identified by the experts and determines how the safeguards termination algorithm could be revised to more accurately reflect the difficulty of recovering one significant quantity of nuclear material from these waste forms.
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗