Analysis of Approximations in Modeling of BWR Bundle Void Distributions
In boiling water reactors, complex heterogeneous bundle designs, control blades adjacent to the corner of bundles, and the presence of boiling can lead to complex internal void distributions. A few approximations exist to model these void distributions. They could be modeled using a 1D axial solver in which each axial node is assumed to be at an average void, or each pin cell could be modeled with its own void concentration. In the latter case, the void could be discretized in pin-centered or coolant-centered channels. The goal of this project was to quantify the effect of using the different approximations for modeling internal void distributions on neutronics calculations. Using 3D void distributions calculated with CTF, Monte Carlo Neutral Particle (MCNP) transport code models were created for GE-9 and GE-14 lattices. For each model, the internal void distribution from CTF at a given axial node was selected, and a lattice calculation was carried out with MCNP. Comparisons between models using a lattice-averaged void, or using a void distribution in coolant-centered channels, showed large differences in reactivity which in some cases were well above 1,000 pcm, and it also showed differences in normalized fission rates greater than 20%. It was also found that using a lattice average void can lead to a significant difference in the estimation of the worth of a control blade. The differences found when comparing results from models using pin-centered and coolant-centered channels were up to 200 pcm in reactivity and up to 1.4% in the normalized fission rates. In addition to these two sets of comparisons, MCNP models were set up so that each subchannel had a saturated liquid component around the fuel pins and a saturated vapor component in the center to approximate annular flow. In comparison to the models using coolant-centered subchannels, up to 1–3% differences in normalized fission rates could be found.