Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Ku, Nicholas

Publications and source records attributed to Ku, Nicholas.

3D printing of ceramics: Advantages, challenges, applications, and perspectives

Abstract 3D printing (3DP) technologies have transformed the processing of advanced ceramics for small‐scale and custom designs during the past three decades. Simple and complex parts are designed and manufactured using 3DP technologies for structural, piezoelectric, and biomedical applications. Manufacturing simple or complex geometries or one‐of‐a‐kind components without part‐specific tooling saves significant time and creates new applications for advanced ceramic materials. Although development and innovations in 3DP of ceramics are far behind compared with metals or polymers, with the availability of different commercial machines in recent years for 3DP of ceramics, exponential growth is expected in this field in the coming decade. This article details various 3DP technologies for advanced ceramic materials, their advantages and challenges for manufacturing parts for various applications, and perspectives on future directions. We envision this work will be helpful to advanced ceramic researchers in industry and academia who are using different 3DP processes in the coming days.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Machine-learning-based, online estimation of ceramic’s microstructure upon the laser spot brightness during laser sintering

The ceramic microstructure strongly influences its properties. During manufacturing, the online monitoring of microstructure is critical to ensure the desired material properties. So far, the microstructure on the relevant scale is usually characterized offline using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), which is time and cost-consuming. In this work, we demonstrate a cost-effective, machine learning (ML)-based approach to simulate the SEM micrographs in real-time from the laser spot brightness. We experimentally observed a strong correlation between the laser spot brightness and the corresponding microstructure at the exact locations. The brightness values obtained from thermal emission images and the corresponding SEM micrographs were used in the training datasets. The ML algorithm was a style-based conditional generative adversarial network (CGAN). After training, the ML model could generate high-fidelity microstructure images within 0.1 seconds based on in-situ captured brightness at the laser sintering spot. We used the average grain sizes as the metric to evaluate the accuracy of the ML-predicted micrographs. Here, the ML-predicted microstructures were in good agreement, with less than 5% in difference from the real SEM images. In conclusion, we demonstrate the cost-effective, online microstructure estimation during laser sintering with a simple setup (a camera, a regular computer, and the ML model).

08 HYDROGEN↗