Engineering topics

Kuhn, Erik M.

Publications and source records attributed to Kuhn, Erik M..

3 records

DOE OSTI2022

Effect of Feedstock Variability, Feedstock Blends, and Pretreatment Conditions on Sugar Yield and Production Costs

Mass production of sustainable biofuels replacing fossil fuels will significantly reduce global greenhouse gas emissions. However, biomass feedstock variability, availability, and affordability pose significant risks for the sustainable production of biofuels in biorefinery plants. To derisk the sustainable production of biofuels, this work investigates the sugar yields and production costs of four different feedstocks as well as their blends, using different pretreatment methods: deacetylation and dilute acid pretreatment (DDA) and deacetylation and mechanical refining pretreatment (DMR). We found that not only feedstock species variability, but also feedstock harvesting techniques have large impacts on both sugar yields and production costs. Single-pass harvested corn stover (SPCS) showed higher sugar yields and lower production costs than multipass harvested corn stover, followed by sorghum and switchgrass. The highest glucose yields of 91% and 95.3%, which corresponds to the lowest sugar production costs of $0.2286/lb. and $0.2490/lb., were observed for SPCS using DDA and DMR, respectively. The difference in sugar yields and production costs due to feedstock variability can be largely mitigated by increasing deacetylation severity, especially in DMR. Higher deacetylation severity resulted in decreased sugar production costs in the case of DMR in contrast to increased costs in the case of DDA. Blending switchgrass and sorghum into corn stover, which can significantly increase the feedstock availability and sustainability, resulted in sugar yields and production costs of roughly the weighted average of those derived from constituent individual feedstocks, respectively. Thus, blending feedstocks of different biomass species is a potential successful strategy for sustainable production of biofuels to replace fossil-derived fuels.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗

DOE OSTI2020

Chemical and Structural Changes in Corn Stover After Ensiling: Influence on Bioconversion

Production of biofuels, bioproducts, and bioenergy requires a well-characterized, stable, and reasonably uniform biomass supply and well-established supply chains for shipping biomass from farm fields to biorefineries, while achieving year-round production targets. Preserving and stabilizing biomass feedstock during storage is a necessity for cost-effective and sustainable biofuel production. Ensiling is a common storage method used to preserve and even improve forage quality; however, the impact of ensiling on biomass physical and chemical properties that influence bioconversion processes has been variable. Our objective in this work was to determine the effects of ensiling on lignocellulosic feedstock physicochemical properties and how that influences bioconversion requirements. We observed statistically significant decreases (p < 0.05) in the content of two major structural carbohydrates (glucan and xylan) of 5 and 8%, respectively, between the ensiled and non-ensiled materials. We were unable to detect differences in sugar yields from structural carbohydrates after pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of the ensiled materials compared to non-ensiled controls. Based on this work, we conclude that ensiling the corn stover did not change the bioconversion requirements compared to the control samples and incurred losses of structural carbohydrates. At the light microscopy level, ensiled corn stover exhibited little structural change or relocation of cell wall components as detected by immunocytochemistry. However, more subtle structural changes were revealed by electron microscopy, as ensiled cell walls exhibit ultrastructural characteristics such as wall delimitation intermediate between non-ensiled and dilute-acid-pretreated cell walls. These findings suggest that alternative methods of conversion, such as deacetylation and mechanical refining, could take advantage of lamellar defects and may be more effective than dilute acid or hot water pretreatment for biomass conversion of ensiled materials.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗

DOE OSTI2020

Deacetylation and Mechanical Refining (DMR) and Deacetylation and Dilute Acid (DDA) Pretreatment of Corn Stover, Switchgrass, and a 50/50 Corn Stover/Switchgrass Blend

The most economical feedstock available to future lignocellulosic biorefineries may be a feedstock blend. Corn stover, switchgrass, and a 50:50 blend of corn stover and switchgrass were subjected to three different dilute alkali deacetylation conditions in a 90 L reactor prior to either mechanical refining (DMR) in a disc refiner followed by a Szego mill or dilute acid pretreatment (DDA) at five different conditions in a 4 L batch steam explosion reactor. The forty-five DDA and nine DMR slurries were subjected to high solids enzymatic hydrolysis at an enzyme loading of 15 mg protein per gram cellulose using Novozymes Cellic CTec3 (DDA) or a 4:1 mix of Novozymes Cellic CTec3:HTec 3 (DMR). The highest glucose yield was achieved using DMR processed corn stover from the high severity deacetylation condition (92 °C and 100 kg NaOH/ODMT) at 95.9% ± 0.8%, while the greatest monomeric glucose yields for switchgrass were between 75% to 80%. The glucose yields from saccharification of the 50:50 corn stover/switchgrass blend was approximately the average of the two individual feedstocks for both DDA and DMR processes. Statistical analysis showed that for a given feedstock type dilute alkali deacetylation severity had a significant impact (p < 0.05) on enzymatic hydrolysis yields, and for a given deacetylation severity the feedstock type had a significant effect on glucose conversion with the addition of switchgrass resulting in lower glucose yields. A blending strategy to maximize enzymatic hydrolysis sugar yields while reducing carbohydrate solubilization during the alkaline treatment step was proposed that allows deacetylation of feedstocks with different recalcitrance at optimal conditions for that feedstock, then blending prior to enzymatic hydrolysis.

BIOMASS FUELS,INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND AN↗