Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Kumar, Abhash

Publications and source records attributed to Kumar, Abhash.

22 records · Page 2

Integrating distributed acoustic sensing, borehole 3C geophone array, and surface seismic array data to identify long-period long-duration seismic events during stimulation of a Marcellus Shale gas reservoir

Microseismic monitoring by downhole geophones, surface seismic, fiber-optic distributed acoustic sensing (DAS), and distributed temperature sensing (DTS) observations were made during the hydraulic fracture stimulation of the MIP-3H well in the Marcellus Shale in northern West Virginia. DAS and DTS data measure the fiber strain and temperature, respectively, along a fiber-optic cable cemented behind the casing of the well. The presence of long-period long-duration (LPLD) events is evaluated in the borehole geophones, DAS data, and surface seismic data of one of the MIP-3H stimulated stages. LPLD events are generally overlooked during the conventional processing of microseismic data, but they represent significant nonbrittle deformation produced during hydraulic fracture stimulation. In a single stage that was examined, 160 preexisting fractures and two faults of suboptimal orientation are noted in the image logs. We identified two low-frequency ([Formula: see text]) events of large temporal duration (tens of seconds) by comparing the surface seismic data, borehole geophone data, and DAS amplitude spectra of one of the MIP-3H stages. Spectrograms of DAS traces in time and depth reveal that the first low-frequency event might be an injection noise that has footprints on all DAS channels above the stimulated stage. However, the surface seismic array indicates an LPLD event concurrent with the first low-frequency event on DAS. The second LPLD event on DAS data and surface seismic data is related to a local deformation and does not have footprints on all DAS channels. The interpreted events have duration less than 100 s with frequencies concentrated below 10 Hz, and are accompanied by microseismic events.

Geochemistry & Geophysics↗

Surface Seismic Monitoring of Hydraulic Fracturing Test Site (HFTS) in the Midland Basin, Texas

Low-frequency seismic events of long duration were recorded by a surface array of 48, 3-component geophones during the fracture stimulation of two offset horizontal wells in the Middle Wolfcamp Formation (8000-8100 ft. below the geophone array) at the Hydraulic Fracturing Test Site (HFTS) in Reagan County, TX. Each recorded event was approximately 5-10 seconds long, with no clear first wave arrival; the seismic energy was largely visible on the vertical component suggesting that the events are dominated by P waves. A finite temporal moveout was observed across the seismic network in event arrival times indicating a causal relationship with the local source of deformation. The low-frequency seismic events observed in this study can be distinguished from the more commonly known microseismic events by their: 1) emergent waveform, 2) lack of clear P wave and S wave arrivals, 3) longer duration (few seconds), and 4) lower-frequency energy content (10-60 Hz). Previous researchers have observed similar low-frequency, long duration events in conjunction with the hydraulic fracturing of hydrocarbon reservoirs and have referred to them as long-period, long-duration (LPLD) events in the literature. LPLD events may be important to a comprehensive understanding of fracture stimulation because these events are thought to represent: 1) movement along pre-existing discontinuities such as bedding planes and fractures/faults, 2) deformation of ductile rocks with high clay content, and 3) the jerky tensile opening of hydraulic fractures. LPLD events resulting from slow shear-slip on faults and fractures of relatively larger dimension or rupture in the clay rich rock are collectively referred to as slow-slip seismicity, which was first observed in tectonic and volcanic settings, areas with high pore pressure like hydraulically fractured reservoirs. Because LPLDs are thought to represent deformation mechanisms not captured by microseismic analysis (which dominantly indicate shear failure of brittle rock), we believe that incorporating LPLD events into a new methodology for delimiting stimulated reservoir volume might improve predictions of well production.

Kumar, Abhash↗