Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Lambert, Dennis M.

Publications and source records attributed to Lambert, Dennis M..

7 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2018

Toughness Testing for Liquid Hydrogen And Helium Temperatures - Validation of Austenitic Stainless Steels for 4K (-452F) Use

This presentation is an Existing Code Requirement: Charpy impact test at a temperature no higher than the design minimum temperature. The Current Practice: is not clear, the indications are that testing is sometimes performed at -320F (liquid nitrogen or "LN2") for that and all lower temperatures. In some cases testing is probably not performed and CGA indicated successful operation of systems at -453F without required test. The Ballot activity: C&S Connect Record 13-341, Ballot 13-1746, initially proposed Charpy testing (lateral expansion criteria) at -320F to validate use at -425 (liquid helium or "LHe"). and PTCS Proposal..

Greulich, Owen R.↗
NASA NTRS2016

Evaluation of the Effect of Surface Finish on High-Cycle Fatigue for SLM-IN718

A high-cycle fatigue (HCF) knockdown factor was estimated for Inconel 718, manufactured with the selective laser melt (SLM) process. This factor is the reduction at a common fatigue life from the maximum stress in fatigue for low-stress ground (LSG) specimens to the maximum stress of those left with the original surface condition. Various vendors provided specimens. To reduce the number of degrees-of-freedom, only one heat treat condition was evaluated. Testing temperatures included room temperature, 800F, 1000F, and 1200F. The two surface conditions were compared at constant lives, where data was available. The recommended knockdown factor of the as-built surface condition (average roughness of approximately 245 micro-inches/inch) versus low-stress ground condition (roughness <= 4 micro-inches/inch) is approximately 1/3 or 33%. This is to say that for the as-built surface condition, a maximum stress of 2/3 of the stress for LSG can be expected to produce the same life in the as built surface condition. As an alternative method, the surface finish was incorporated into a new parameter with the maximum stress. The new parameter was formulated to be similar to the fracture mechanics stress intensity factor, and it was named the pseudo stress intensity factor, Kp. Using Kp, the variance seemed acceptable across all sources, and the knockdown factor was estimated over the range of data identified by Kp where data occurred. A plot of the results suggests that the knockdown factor is a function of temperature, and that for low lives the knockdown is greater than the knockdown observed above about one million cycles, where it stabilizes. One data point at room temperature was clearly different, and the sparsity of data in the higher life region reduces the value of these results. The method does appear to provide useful results, and further characterization of the method is suggested.

Lambert, Dennis M.↗
NASA NTRS2015

IN718 Additive Manufacturing Properties and Influences

The results of tensile, fracture, and fatigue testing of IN718 coupons produced using the selective laser melting (SLM) additive manufacturing technique are presented. The data have been "sanitized" to remove the numerical values, although certain references to material standards are provided. This document provides some knowledge of the effect of variation of controlled build parameters used in the SLM process, a snapshot of the capabilities of SLM in industry at present, and shares some of the lessons learned along the way. For the build parameter characterization, the parameters were varied over a range that was centered about the machine manufacturer's recommended value, and in each case they were varied individually, although some co‐variance of those parameters would be expected. Tensile, fracture, and high‐cycle fatigue properties equivalent to wrought IN718 are achievable with SLM-produced IN718. Build and post‐build processes need to be determined and then controlled to established limits to accomplish this. It is recommended that a multi‐variable evaluation, e.g., design‐of experiment (DOE), of the build parameters be performed to better evaluate the co‐variance of the parameters.

Lambert, Dennis M.↗
NASA NTRS2015

IN718 Additive Manufacturing Properties and Influences

The results of tensile, fracture, and fatigue testing of IN718 coupons produced using the selective laser melting (SLM) additive manufacturing technique are presented. The data has been "generalized" to remove the numerical values, although certain references to material standards are provided. This document provides some knowledge of the effect of variation of controlled build parameters used in the SLM process, a snapshot of the capabilities of SLM in industry at present, and shares some of the lessons learned along the way. For the build parameter characterization, the parameters were varied over a range about the machine manufacturer's recommended value, and in each case they were varied individually, although some co‐variance of those parameters would be expected. SLM‐produced IN718, tensile, fracture, and high‐cycle fatigue properties equivalent to wrought IN718 are achievable. Build and post‐build processes need to be determined and then controlled to established limits to accomplish this. It is recommended that a multi‐variable evaluation, e.g., design‐of‐experiment (DOE), of the build parameters be performed to better evaluate the co‐variance of the parameters.

Lambert, Dennis M.↗
NASA NTRS1994

Fracture mechanics validity limits

Fracture behavior is characteristics of a dramatic loss of strength compared to elastic deformation behavior. Fracture parameters have been developed and exhibit a range within which each is valid for predicting growth. Each is limited by the assumptions made in its development: all are defined within a specific context. For example, the stress intensity parameters, K, and the crack driving force, G, are derived using an assumption of linear elasticity. To use K or G, the zone of plasticity must be small as compared to the physical dimensions of the object being loaded. This insures an elastic response, and in this context, K and G will work well. Rice's J-integral has been used beyond the limits imposed on K and G. J requires an assumption of nonlinear elasticity, which is not characteristic of real material behavior, but is thought to be a reasonable approximation if unloading is kept to a minimum. As well, the constraint cannot change dramatically (typically, the crack extension is limited to ten-percent of the initial remaining ligament length). Rice, et al investigated the properties required of J-type parameters, J(sub x), and showed that the time rate, dJ(sub x)/dt, must not be a function of the crack extension rate, da/dt. Ernst devised the modified-J parameter, J(sub M), that meets this criterion. J(sub M) correlates fracture data to much higher crack growth than does J. Ultimately, a limit of the validity of J(sub M) is anticipated, and this has been estimated to be at a crack extension of about 40-percent of the initial remaining ligament length. None of the various parameters can be expected to describe fracture in an environment of gross plasticity, in which case the process is better described by deformation parameters, e.g., stress and strain. In the current study, various schemes to identify the onset of the plasticity-dominated behavior, i.e., the end of fracture mechanics validity, are presented. Each validity limit parameter is developed in detail, and then data is presented and the various schemes for establishing a limit of the validity are compared. The selected limiting parameter is applied to a set of fracture data showing the improvement of correlation gained.

Lambert, Dennis M.↗