Search NASASearch

Engineering topics

Lennart S Hultgren

Publications and source records attributed to Lennart S Hultgren.

Impact of Future Low-Emissions Combustor Technology on Acoustic Scaling Laws

A first-of-its-kind examination of broadband noise associated with a far-term advanced low-emission aero-combustor concept is presented. Due to design trends and expected cycle changes for future aircraft propulsion systems, noise generated by sources in the combustor are expected to become of increasing significance for airport-community noise. The paper assesses the impact on legacy semi-empirical noise-prediction methods from the expected radical departures from current combustor operating conditions and designs, such as fuel-air distribution and flame anchoring techniques. Such methods are essential in system-level noise assessments at the preliminary design stage for advanced air transports to assure that overall environmental goals are met. Detailed unsteady pressure measurements, obtained in a fundamental combustion noise experiment utilizing a combustor rig at relevant pressures and temperatures, are analyzed. In addition to an advanced far-term low-emissions concept, a reference configuration with the test section arranged to model a modern combustor sector was also studied. For the test rig in the current-generation configuration, the measured broadband acoustic data are reasonably well described by the acoustic-power scaling laws used in legacy semi-empirical noise-prediction methods. For the future-advanced configuration, the legacy scaling laws, with some notable exceptions, provide correct trends, but with much less accuracy

aeroacoustics

DGEN Aeropropulsion Research Turbofan Core/Combustor-Noise Measurements-Experiment and Modal Structure at Core-Nozzle Exit

Data from a recent core/combustor-noise source-diagnostic test utilizing a small turbo-fan engine are analyzed. The campaign continued the exploration begun in a baseline test, but with more extensive acoustic instrumentation. Both tests were aimed at developing a better understanding of propulsion-noise sources and their impact on the farfield noise signature, in order to enable improved turbofan noise-prediction methods and noise-mitigation techniques. Simultaneous high-data-rate acoustic measurements (93 channels in total) were obtained using a circumferential sensor array at the core-nozzle exit in conjunction with sideline and farfield microphone arrays for several relevant engine operational points. Measurements were repeated for different circumferential and sideline array configurations, as well as for redundancy. The unsteady pressure field at the core-nozzle exit is documented in detail. Previous work suggested that the±1azimuthal duct mode could be cut-on at this location, which would have implications for combustor-noise modeling and prediction. The modal decomposition of the combustor noise at the core-nozzle exit verifies this observation. Select farfield sound-pressure-level spectra are also presented.

Aeroacoustics

DGEN Aeropropulsion Research Turbofan Source-Diagnostic Test: Experimental Setup and Acoustic-Data Structure

The experimental setup of, and available data from a recent core/combustor-noise source-diagnostic test utilizing a small turbofan engine are described. The 2019 test campaign continued the investigation of the core/combustor-noise component of aircraft-propulsor noise begun in an earlier baseline test, but with a more extensive acoustic-instrumentation layout. The purpose of both tests was to better understand the impact on civilian-transport airport-community noise from turbofan-combustor sources and thereby to lay the foundation for improved noise-prediction methods and noise-mitigation techniques. Simultaneous high-data-rate acoustic measurements were obtained using a circumferential sensor array at the core nozzle exit in conjunction with sideline and farfield microphone arrays. The test matrix contained engine operational points from engine idle to maximum power and was repeated for different circumferential and sideline array configurations, as well as for redundancy. The extensive data set (up to 93 channels of data and various configurations) allows the application of advanced source-separation and phased-array methods to elucidate not only the core-noise structure, but also the propagation characteristics of other propulsion noise sources. The present report provides a detailed description of the different test points, their associated instrumentation layouts, and the structure of the acquired data set. Results from various data analyses are reported separately.

Aeroacoustics

2019 DART Source-Diagnostic Test Results Update

This presentation serves as an update to results from the 2019 DART Core Noise Source Diagnostics Test. Modal decomposition results are presented and discussed in addition to a reiteration of the test background and introductory information.

Aeroacoustics

DGEN Core Noise

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Aeroacoustics

Notes on Digital-Data Analysis

The presentation is an overview and discussion of concepts normally encountered during digital-signal processing of sampled time histories. It is not a comprehensive literature survey, but simply a practical guide for best usage. Sections of the talk cover: digital sampling and representation, the Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem, aliasing or frequency folding, the power spectrum, windowing and spectral spreading, scalloping, and best practices. The Advanced Air Transport Technology Project supports this effort.

Aeroacoustics

Learjet Flight Test Update

The status of the future jet-noise test using a Lear 25 aircraft is provided. The intent of the test is to provide data for comparisons with scale-model data acquired in the Aero-Acoustic Propulsion Laboratory (AAPL) and a new single-stream jet noise model.

Jet Noise

Jet Noise Flyover and Scale Model Tests

Renewed interest in commercial supersonic flight has rekindled the need for accurate jet-noise predictions as this source is believed to dominate at aircraft takeoff conditions. The current study compares scale-model data acquired in the NASA Aero-Acoustic Propulsion Laboratory with data obtained using a well-instrumented Learjet 25 in a flyover test completed in September 2022. The flight test included 73 flyovers with engine conditions ranging from 1.5 to 2.0 engine pressure ratios and flight Mach numbers between 0.24 and 0.27. Acoustic data were acquired with an 800-ft linear ground plate microphone array. Wind speed data were acquired up to 1000-ft altitude with a ground-based LiDAR system. Layered ambient temperature, pressure, and humidity were acquired with a weather drone. A 6% increase in the physical scale factor for the scale-model data was found to reasonably align the peak frequencies of the scale-model and flight data and resulted in peak levels for the scale model being roughly 0.7 dB above those for the flight data at NPR = 1.56 and roughly 1 dB below those for the flight data at NPR = 1.91 in the peak jet-noise direction. Comparisons with the SAE ARP876 model were poor especially at emission angles greater than, or equal to, 110° and at high frequencies.

jet noise, supersonic transport

Jet Noise Flyover and Scale Model Tests

Renewed interest in commercial supersonic flight has rekindled the need for accurate jet-noise predictions as this source is believed to dominate at aircraft takeoff conditions. The current study compares scale-model data acquired in the NASA Aero-Acoustic Propulsion Laboratory with data obtained using a well-instrumented Learjet 25D in a flyover test completed in September 2022. The flight test included 73 flyovers with engine conditions ranging from 1.5 to 2.0 engine pressure ratios and flight Mach numbers between 0.24 and 0.27. Acoustic data were acquired with an 800-ft linear ground plate microphone array. Wind speed data were acquired up to 1000-sft altitude with a ground-based LiDAR system. Layered ambient temperature, pressure, and humidity were acquired with a weather drone. A 6% increase in the physical scale factor for the scale-model data was found to reasonably align the peak frequencies of the scale-model and flight data and resulted in peak levels for the scale model being roughly 0.7 dB above those for the flight data at NPR = 1.56 and roughly 1 dB below those for the flight data at NPR = 1.91 in the peak jet-noise direction. Comparisons with the SAE ARP876 model were poor especially at emission angles greater than, or equal to, 110° and at high frequencies.

Acoustics, jet noise, supersonic transport

Evaluation of Silicon Carbide Pressure Sensor in Turbofan Engine Core Exhaust Nozzle

We report the results of the evaluation of single crystal 4H-silicon carbide piezoresistive pressure sensors that were directly inserted at the compressor and core exhaust nozzle exits, in shear contact with the engine-internal flow streams of the NASA DGEN Aeropropulsion Research Turbofan, where the operating temperatures at maximum power were ~230 oC, and ~460 oC, respectively. In addition to demonstrating sensor survivability during this maiden test, the frequency responses of the silicon-carbide sensors at the core-nozzle exit were compared against industry-standard silicon-based piezoresistive pressure transducers that externally placed, using an infinite-tube-probe arrangement. The low-voltage output of these early-development SiC sensors limited the frequency range with an acceptable signal-to-noise-ratio for the current application to less than about 2,500 Hz. The low output of the SiC sensors were due to a conservative burst-pressure diaphragm design that can be optimized to increase the frequency range. The results from this initial campaign offered insights to aspects of the sensor that would require further improvement, with the goal of achieving full-bandwidth capture of engine unsteady pressure fluctuations by direct interrogation of the flow field in hostile-environment engine-core components.

Silicon Carbide

Learjet Update Flight and Scale-Model-Nozzle Acoustics Test

The impetus for the work is the need for an improved ability to predict takeoff noise of future supersonic commercial transport aircraft. The overall objective is to validate as well as improve the conversion of facility scale-model data and semi-empirical jet-noise predictions to flight noise. Acoustic data from a Learjet-25 flyover test and a complementary rig-test are compared. The uncertainty in the rig-to-flight transformation is presented. Ultimately, the goal is improved noise-prediction methods for system studies of future commercial supersonic aircraft.

Lennart S Hultgren