Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Leonardo G Machado

Publications and source records attributed to Leonardo G Machado.

Computational Aerodynamic Analysis in Support of the CRM Tail Cone Thruster Configuration Wind Tunnel Test

NASA’s Advanced Air Transport Technology (AATT) project is breaching the boundaries of aircraft design in pursuit of eco-friendly solutions that are compatible with urban noise comfort levels. Boundary layer ingesting (BLI) propulsion systems promise to reduce fuel burn with additional potential benefits in noise reduction. Type-II BLI systems of the STARC-ABL type are the subject of a test campaign planned for fiscal year 2022 in the National Transonic Facility (NTF), for which a CRM-based model with a retrofitted tail cone thruster (TCT) has been designed. The present work is a precursor to the NTF test, where the 240 cases planned for the experiment were simulated using the Launch, Ascent and Vehicle Aerodynamics (LAVA)computational framework. Solution sensitivity to angle of attack, engine operating conditions, and the presence of the supporting structure (sting) in the wind tunnel test are analyzed in the extensive dataset. The main flow features contributing to the inlet distortion are identified as the vertical tail wake, wing downwash and fuselage upsweep vortices, with the latter two experiencing the greatest sensitivity to angle of attack. Finally, results from an inlet-guide-vane(IGV) design/integration study are presented. The LAVA team and the turbomachinery design team at NASA’s Ames and Glenn Research Centers are collaborating in an effort to reduce flow distortion upstream of the fan by means of integrating an IGV system into the CRM-TCT model. A significant improvement in flow distortion metrics has been achieved since the initial design iteration. Results employing an actuator zone model with realistic radially-varying thrust profiles to simulate first-order fan effects within LAVA are presented.

AATT↗

High-Lift Common Research Model: RANS, HRLES and WMLES Perspectives for CLmax Prediction Using LAVA

A unified assessment of three turbulence treatments: Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes(RANS), Hybrid RANS/LES (HRLES) and Equilibrium Wall-Modelled Large Eddy Simulation(WMLES) is presented for the High-Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL). For the free-air configuration, steady-state RANS simulations show very accurate drag polar predictions in the low-𝛼linear regime. However, strong grid sensitivity is reported near the maximum lift-state(𝐶𝐿max), with finer-grids showing larger errors and predicting erroneous flow topologies on the wing. Our RANS simulations show that several corrections for the Spalart-Allmaras (SA)turbulence model widely used in the community lead to more erroneous results compared to the baseline closure, without exception. Both scale-resolving methods (HRLES and WMLES)address these drawbacks and predict an outboard separation pattern on the main element that is in good agreement with the oil flow photographs taken from the QinetiQ wind tunnel experiments, when LES-appropriate grids and numerical discretizations are used. While RANS simulations with the baseline SA closure do not show any wing-root separation post𝐶𝐿max, both HRLES and WMLES show onset of corner flow separation with varying degrees of progression, along with a weak pitch break in the wing-contribution of the overall pitching moment. This post-𝐶𝐿max pitch break seen in the free-air simulations is weaker than the break observed in experiments, with a weaker break reported in WMLES for each iteration of grid-refinement. In-tunnel simulations using both SA-baseline RANS and WMLES show a much stronger post-𝐶𝐿max break with the WMLES predictions showing excellent agreement with the experiment in terms of both the flow-topology observed and the pressure-coefficients at various spanwise stations. Sensitivity to the tunnel wall boundary layer is characterized via comparisons between viscous and inviscid treatments for the tunnel walls. WMLES predictions show moderate sensitivity at the predicted inboard flow-state at 𝐶𝐿max along with the progression towards a post-𝐶𝐿max stall; however, this stalled state at 𝛼≈20◦(inside the tunnel) obtained with both tunnel wall treatments appears to be largely identical.

TTT↗

Brief Overview of Subsonic Single Aft Engine (SUSAN) Transport Aircraft Concept and Trade Space Exploration

The SUSAN concept uses a 20-megawatt Electrified Aircraft Propulsion system to enable advance Propulsion Airframe Integration in transport category aircraft. Alternative fuels will be used to reduce the amount of emissions per energy used. By combining these features there is the potential to reduce aircraft emissions by 50 percent per passenger/mile while retaining the size, speed, and range of large regional jets. The SUSAN is has a 750-mile economic mission, a 2500-mile design range and a maximum capacity of 180 passengers. The SUSAN configuration utilizes a single aft mounted engine and distributed electric wing-mounted thrusters on a tube and wing arrangement with a T-tail empennage. The SUSAN Electrofan employs a hybrid powertrain to enable: single turbofan operation on a large transport category aircraft; increased aerodynamic and propulsive efficiency through placement of electric engines; optimized turbofan sizing and efficiency through control and electric boosting, reduced control surface sizing through thrust augmentation. A single use battery is employed as the power source in case of turbofan failure. The design study also considers the constraints of operating within the current airport, airspace, and economic constraints. Forward work includes optimizing the overall aircraft configuration and including certain hard to model features like boundary layer ingestion or natural laminar flow across all appliable subsystems. Additional work forward work is a more extensive analysis of the configuration using alternative fuels.

Ralph Jansen↗

A Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Perspective for the High Lift Common Research Model Using the LAVA Framework

An in-depth assessment of the High Lift-Common Research Model (HL-CRM) aerodynamic performance is made using a Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) methodology. Results presented here were produced in support of the 4th AIAA High Lift Prediction Workshop(HLPW-4), with additional simulation results and analysis used to support findings from the workshop. Mesh resolution, RANS closure models, and tunnel effects were among the sources of simulation sensitivity addressed, all in the pursuit of evaluating best-practice simulation methods for complex high-lift configurations. In general, free-air simulations using RANS yield accurate predictions of integrated loads in the pre-stall regime for the HL-CRM, while strong sensitivity to simulation method is observed near CLmax. Additionally, a study assessing changes in aerodynamic performance due to flap deflection angle indicated strong sensitivity to turbulence model closure and mesh resolution, particularly at the highest deflection setting. Several available corrections for the Spalart-Allmaras (SA) turbulence model were tested and generally introduced more error relative to the experiment in comparison to the baseline SA closure model. The Standard Menter Baseline Two-Equation (k-ωBSL) turbulence model was also explored, which arguably yielded results highly consistent with experiment, but at a substantially higher computational cost. Therefore, as a compromise between computational cost and accuracy, the baseline SA closure model was selected for additional HL-CRM studies that assess alternative solution methods. These strategies include “warm start” approaches, which initialize the simulation from a previously converged solution at a nearby angle of attack, unsteady calculations, and simulations that model the experimental wind tunnel. Results from these studies would reinforce the shortcomings of RANS in predicting aircraft performance at high-lift conditions, namely at high-αand highly loaded flap conditions, while also answering questions about appropriate modeling techniques to minimize the errors associated with RANS where possible

TTT↗

Computational Analysis of a Boundary-Layer Ingesting Tailcone Thruster Configuration Within the National Transonic Facility Using the LAVA Solver

Boundary-layer ingesting (BLI) propulsion systems are one of the many technologies currently under investigation within the aerospace community to meet NASA’s Advanced Air Transport Technology project goal of a sustainable future in aviation. To that end, an experimental campaign was conducted in the National Transonic Facility (NTF) to study the propulsion-airframe integration effects of the Boundary-Layer Ingesting Tailcone System installed in the aft portion of a 2.7% scale design of the NASA Common Research Model (CRM). This test was accompanied by a numerical simulation effort using the Launch, Ascent, and Vehicle Aerodynamics (LAVA) solver, to validate the applicability of current best-practice Reynolds-averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) models in accurately predicting the relevant flow-physics in free-air. A total of 205 steady RANS simulations were performed using LAVA, covering the range of conditions present in the NTF test matrix. Flow conditions ranged from 5- to 15-million Reynolds number, Mach numbers of 0.75, 0.80 and 0.85, and angles-of-attack between –3° and 4°. Four different mass-flow plugs were also tested to assess propulsor operating condition effects. Sensitivity to these flow conditions are analyzed in detail, especially in terms of the nacelle flow distortion which was the main subject of the study. Aerodynamic load coefficients, aftbody boundary-layer measurements and fuselage pressure tap results are also discussed, providing a wide range of validation results from this experimental campaign. This validation effort shows that current best-practices using RANS models within the LAVA solver flow solver are well suited for predicting the inlet flow distortion characteristics of novel aircraft configurations employing BLI at the aft end of the fuselage.

AATT↗