Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Liang, Edison

Publications and source records attributed to Liang, Edison.

Dense Pair and Gamma-Ray Creation Using Ultra-Intense Lasers (Final Technical Report)

Lasers with intensity >1.4x10 18 W.cm -2 irradiating solid targets couple 10-50% of its energy to “hot electrons” near the critical surface, with temperature kT > mc 2 . When these hot electrons impact high-Z target ions (e.g. Au, Pt), they emit copious bremsstrahlung gamma-rays and create e + e - pairs via the Trident process. For targets thicker than ~0.1mm, the gamma-rays create secondary pairs via the Bethe-Heitler processes. The concept of using lasers to create pairs was first studied by Shearer et al (1973). Motivated by the rapid advance of short-pulse ultra-intense lasers based on chirped-pulse amplification, Liang (1994) first proposed irradiating solid Au targets with laser intensity ≥10 20 W.cm -2 to create dense e + e - pairs. Using particle-in-cell (PIC, Birdsall and Langdon, 1991) simulations, Liang et al (1998, 2002) estimated that high-energy PW lasers can in principle achieve ultra-high in-situ pair densities. Subsequent studies supported this idea and found that for gold foils thicker than ~50 μm, the pair yield is dominated by the Bethe-Heitler (BH, Heitler 1954) process. Cowan et al (1999, 2000) using the LLNL Nova PW-laser to irradiate 125μm gold foils first observed pair creation, followed by Chen et al (2009) who demonstrated copious BH pair creation using the Titan, Omega-EP and Orion lasers. However, the emerging e + /e - ratio of these experiments was ≤ few %, and the pair density was only 10 13 /cc so that the pair jet transverse size R(~mm) was < pair skin depth c/ω + (=8πn+e 2 /m) 1/2 ). This was insufficient to qualify as a bona fide ”pair plasma”.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗

Relativistic Shear Boundary Layer and the Gamma-Ray Emission of GW170817

We present an analysis of the radiation characteristics of kinetic shear boundary layers created by relativistic plasma jets. Using a model of electromagnetic field data based on particle-in-cell simulations of an electron–ion plasma, we solve the motion of individual test electrons and compute their instantaneous radiated power and peak frequency. By analyzing a large number of test electrons in this manner, we find two distinct electron populations present around the shear boundary layer. The most highly radiative electrons execute looping motion due to crossed electric and magnetic fields as they are accelerated along the bulk flow of the jet, and eventually cross the shear boundary interface at steep angles. Electrons that never cross the shear boundary interface radiate much less energy as a group. Summing over all of the highly radiative electrons, we compute the distribution of the total radiated energy as a function of the angle relative to the bulk flow. Furthermore, this result has important potential implications for the observed radiation output of short gamma-ray bursts viewed at large angles from the jet axis, such as the neutron star merger event GW170817/GRB 170817A.

79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS↗

Time-step dependent force interpolation scheme for suppressing numerical Cherenkov instability in relativistic particle-in-cell simulations

The WT scheme, a piecewise polynomial force interpolation scheme with time-step dependency, is proposed in this paper for relativistic particle-in-cell (PIC) simulations. The WT scheme removes the lowest order numerical Cherenkov instability (NCI) growth rate for arbitrary time steps allowed by the Courant condition. While NCI from higher order resonances is still present, the numerical tests show that for smaller time steps, the numerical instability grows much slower than using the optimal time step found in previous studies. The WT scheme is efficient for improving the quality and flexibility of relativistic PIC simulations.

72 PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS↗

Modeling hydrodynamics, magnetic fields, and synthetic radiographs for high-energy-density plasma flows in shock-shear targets

Three-dimensional FLASH radiation-magnetohydrodynamics (radiation-MHD) modeling is carried out to study the hydrodynamics and magnetic fields in the shock-shear derived platform. Here, simulations indicate that fields of tens of Tesla can be generated via the Biermann battery effect due to vortices and mix in the counterpropagating shock-induced shear layer. Synthetic proton radiography simulations using MPRAD and synthetic X-ray image simulations using SPECT3D are carried out to predict the observable features in the diagnostics. Quantifying the effects of magnetic fields in inertial confinement fusion and high-energy-density plasmas represents frontier research that has far-reaching implications in basic and applied sciences.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗

Gamma-ray bursts and neutron star field decay

Assuming a Galactic origin of gamma-ray bursts, we use pulsar data to calculate the spatial distribution of neutron stars and determine the sampling depths of current detectors. Based on these distance limits, we calculate the corresponding age distribution of Galactic neutron stars and apply an exponential field decay model to test whether the observed high incidence rate of cyclotron lines is consistent with suggested field decay time scales of order 10 exp 7 years. We find that the properties of the observed population of gamma-ray bursts are inconsistent with the idea that bursts originate at arbitrary times on neutron stars whose fields decay on time scales shorter than about 10 exp 9 years. Possible interpretations of this inconsistency are discussed.

Hartmann, Dieter↗

Physics issues of gamma ray burst emissions

The critical physics issues in the interpretation of gamma-ray-burst spectra are reviewed. An attempt is made to define the emission-region parameter space satisfying the maximum number of observational and theoretical constraints. Also discussed are the physical mechanisms responsible for the bursts that are most consistent with the above parameter space.

Liang, Edison↗