Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Liang, P. Y.

Publications and source records attributed to Liang, P. Y..

10 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1992

Multi-phase simulations of coaxial injector combustion

A multiphase computational fluid dynamics code (ARICC-3D) is presented and results of two simulations are discussed. The numerical framework of the CFD code is reviewed as well as some of the two-phase physical submodels. The simulations performed include a single coaxial element injector and a multielement injector using LOX/Hydrogen reactants. The single element injector simulation verified the interaction among the code's submodels. The multielement injector simulation transient results include the chamber response to a transverse pressure wave with and without a chamber baffle. The results of these simulations demonstrate the current capabilities and their limitations to model complex two-phase combustion phenomena. Possible ways to exceed these limitations are suggested.

Liang, P. Y.↗
NASA NTRS1990

Atomization modeling in a multiphase flow environment and comparison with experiments

An atomization model based on Reitz's instability wave analysis has been implemented into the ARICC3D multiphase CFD combustion code. Preliminary test runs with cold non-evaporating liquid jet and coaxial gas-liquid atomization cases appeared to have verified basic performance of the model, generating realistic-looking sprays. Furthermore, the extended liquid jet is explicitly resolved, and predicted jet lengths agree well with classical correlations. Fair agreement with test data is obtained for predicted spray tip penetrations and liquid mass flux radial distributions, with obvious room for improvement. Some numerical problems also appear to have resulted with the current implementation when low gas Mach number and high liquid velocities are involved.

Liang, P. Y.↗
NASA NTRS1986

Analysis of coaxial spray combustion flames and related numerical issues

An approach to the simulation of strongly coupled multiphase flows in combustion hardware is sketched and its unique requirements highlighted. An example of a successful application to a coaxial injector flame is presented. Furthermore, several numerical issues that tend to interact with the physics of the problem are discussed with special regard to their potential impact on the choices of numerical parameters by the analyst. These include the issues of stability, numerical diffusivity, stiffness, and boundary conditions. The theme of this paper focuses on the intriguing relationships among the grid, the solution algorithm, and the actual physical mechanisms themselves.

Liang, P. Y.↗
NASA NTRS1986

Numerical analysis of SSME preburner injector atomization and combustion processes

The coaxial spray injection and combustion flowfields of a Space Shuttle Main Engine preburner injector element have been analyzed using a three-phase numerical code. The processes of atomization, evaporation, secondary droplet breakup, and multispecies chemistry, as well as turbulent diffusion, are included. The model produced realistic pictures of the complex internal flowfield, including liquid jet length, spray shape, flame-zone size and characteristics, and predicted temperatures that seem to be in agreement with test data envelopes. It predicted an external group combustion type of flame. Salient combustion and mixing features are discussed and sources of uncertainty are pointed out for future studies.

Liang, P. Y.↗
NASA NTRS1985

Modeling of dense sprays from LOX/H2 coaxial injectors under supercritical conditions

Assumptions commonly employed in the analytical description of a thin spray become unacceptable as the droplet density and droplet volume displacement become large. Changes in the semiempirical models describing drop-drop or drop-gas interactions as well as in the basic modeling approach itself may be necessary. A number of efforts undertaken to improve such models of the atomization-evaporation process to render them applicable in the dense-spray, supercritical regime are described. The improvements include those for variable drop density, supercritical properties, stripping evaporation and drop reincorporation into the liquid stream. The models are developed for use with the ARICC three-phase finite difference combustion code. Selected results from a sample calculation are presented, demonstrating the enhanced realism achievable with the upgraded models.

Liang, P. Y.↗
NASA NTRS1985

SSME fuel preburner phase 1/phase 2+ comparison

An analytical comparison of the predicted combustion flowfields for the Phase 1 and Phase 2+ fuel preburner configurations using an advanced CFD combustion code is currently underway at Rocketdyne. The Phase 2+ injector has a modified element design. The redesigned element provides for improved atomization through a shift in the injector element/face bleed flow split while maintaining an acceptable pressure drop. Cold-flow tests of the new design have been encouraging. As a complement to those tests, the Advanced Rocket Injector Combustor Code (ARICC) was selected to conduct a detailed combustion flowfield simulation. ARICC models two-dimensional (or axisymmetric), transient, turbulent, two-phase mixing and combustion flowfields. It is derived from a member of the Los Alamos ICEd-ALE family of codes. Unique features of ARICC include explicit representation of the coaxial LOX jet and hydrogen gas flows, distributed atomization processes, droplet breakup, and supercritical vaporation processes. Predictions of temperature and OH concentration profiles for the Phase 1 and Phase 2+ injector flowfields indicate a trend toward more uniform temperature distributions and shorter flame lengths with the Phase 2+ design.

Jensen, R. J.↗
NASA NTRS1985

Liquid rocket combustor computer code development

The Advanced Rocket Injector/Combustor Code (ARICC) that has been developed to model the complete chemical/fluid/thermal processes occurring inside rocket combustion chambers are highlighted. The code, derived from the CONCHAS-SPRAY code originally developed at Los Alamos National Laboratory incorporates powerful features such as the ability to model complex injector combustion chamber geometries, Lagrangian tracking of droplets, full chemical equilibrium and kinetic reactions for multiple species, a fractional volume of fluid (VOF) description of liquid jet injection in addition to the gaseous phase fluid dynamics, and turbulent mass, energy, and momentum transport. Atomization and droplet dynamic models from earlier generation codes are transplated into the present code. Currently, ARICC is specialized for liquid oxygen/hydrogen propellants, although other fuel/oxidizer pairs can be easily substituted.

Liang, P. Y.↗
NASA NTRS1984

Development of a three-phrase combustion code for modeling liquid rocket engines

A two-dimensional/axisymmetric program for the simulation of three-phase reactive flows is presented. The three phases are: a multiple-species gaseous phase, a single-species liquid phase, and a particulate droplet phase. The liquid and gaseous phases are described with continuous Eulerian equations, while the droplets are described in a discrete Lagrangian fashion. The three phases are fully coupled together. An atomization model, a multireaction chemical kinetics model, and a subgrid scale turbulence model completes the description of a general liquid/gas bipropellant combustion process. The code development criteria and qualitative features are highlighted.

Liang, P. Y.↗
NASA NTRS1983

An inviscid three-dimensional analysis of the Space Shuttle main engine hot-gas manifold

A numerical study using an inviscid three-dimensional Lagrangian fluid dynamics code has been conducted as a part of an overall effort to understand the flow behavior in the SSME fuel side hot-gas manifold. The model simulates flow from the high-pressure fuel turbine exit through the transfer ducts, including the effects of swirl, inlet flow symmetry, and presence of straightening vanes and struts; a separate, more-detailed effort is in progress that includes viscosity and turbulence effects. The simplified model presented is divided into two parts, the first includes the 180-degree turnaround duct downstream of the turbine exit and the spherical fuel bowl section, while the second models the three transfer ducts. The two parts of the model are coupled together with the interface conditions being updated through iteration. Results indicate that a transverse pressure differential of 165 psi would be imposed on the turbine exit and that unstable flow separation occurs around the vanes, struts, and within the transfer ducts. The three transfer ducts show a mass flux split of approximately 41, 21, and 38 percent. Results to date are encouraging that certain flow characteristics can be usefuly represented using a relatively coarse grid inviscid code.

Liang, P. Y.↗