Engineering topics

Liu, M.-C.

Publications and source records attributed to Liu, M.-C..

3 records

NASA NTRS2020

Mg Isotopic Compositions of Fine-Grained Ca-Al-Rich Inclusions from Reduced CV3 Chondrites and Implications on the Timescale of Nebular Condensation

Fine-grained Ca-Al-rich inclusions (FGIs) in carbonaceous chondrites are interpreted as aggregates of nebular gas-solid condensates that escaped significant melting [1]. Recent Al-Mg isotopic studies of small FGIs (<200 µm in size) from pristine CO3 chondrites have revealed significant variations in initial 26Al/27Al ratio, (26Al/27Al)(sub 0), spanning from 5.73×10(exp ˗5) to 8×10(exp ˗6) [2,3]. Importantly, [3] found a main CAI population characterized by (26Al/27Al)(sub 0) = 5.4×10(exp ˗5) that likely record the onset of dust condensation and initial coagulation events, followed by multiple thermal events over an extended time period. Thus far, a small number of large FGIs from CV3 chondrites have been analyzed, showing a narrower range of ( 26Al/27Al)(sub 0) = 5.27×10(exp ˗5) to 3.35×10(exp ˗5) [4-6], similar to those inferred from coarse-grained, igneous CAIs (CGIs) from CV3 chondrites [7]. These observed different ratios may raise a question if large FGIs in CV3 chondrites record a time interval from primary direct condensation of refractory solids to their aggregation and growth into larger inclusions. In this study, we present Al-Mg isotopic compositions of FGIs from reduced CV3 chondrites to better constrain their formation timescale relative to smaller FGIs in CO3 chondrites, as well as to CGIs in CV3 chondrites. This isotopic study is coordinated with a microstructural study to elucidate the origin and nature of FGIs in the petrologic and mineralogical context.

Han, J.↗

NASA NTRS2020

Microstructural and Isotopic Constraints on WL Rim Formation

Coordinated microanalyses of Wark-Lovering (WL) rims are needed to best understand their origin and to decipher their subsequent evolution both in the nebular and parent body settings. Here we present the mineralogy, petrology, microstructures, O isotopic compositions, and Al-Mg systematics of a WL rim on a Type B CAI, ‘‘Big Guy”, from the reduced CV3 chondrite Vigarano [1]. Our SEM and TEM study reveals seven distinct mineral layers in the WL rim that include: (1) gehlenite with rare grossite, (2) hibonite, (3) spinel with minor hibonite and perovskite, (4) zoned melilite (Åk(sub ~0-10)), (5) anorthite, (6) zoned diopside grading outwards from Al,Ti-rich to Al,Tipoor, and (7) forsterite intergrown with diopside. We infer a two-stage history in which WL rim formation was initiated by flash melting and extensive evaporation of the original inclusion edge, followed by subsequent condensation under highly dynamic conditions. The outermost edge of the CAI mantle is mineralogically and texturally distinct compared to the underlying mantle that is composed of coarse, zoned melilite (Åk(sub ~10-60)) grains. The mantle edge contains finegrained gehlenite with hibonite and rare grossite that likely formed by rapid crystallization from a Ca,Al-rich melt produced during a flash vaporization event [2]. These gehlenite and hibonite layers are surrounded by successive layers of spinel, melilite, diopside, and forsterite, indicating their sequential gas-solid reactions onto hibonite. Anorthite occurs as a discontinuous layer that corrodes adjacent melilite and Al-diopside, and appears to have replaced them [3,4], probably even later than the forsterite layer formation. All the WL rim minerals analyzed using the JSC NanoSIMS 50L are 16O-rich (Δ17O ≈ −23‰), indicating their formation in an 16O-rich gas reservoir. Our data are in contrast with many CV CAIs that show heterogeneous Δ 17O values across their WL rims [5]. Our Al-Mg data obtained using the UCLA ims-1290 ion microprobe of the CAI interior and the WL rim define a well-correlated isochron with (26Al/27Al)(sub 0) = 4.94 × 10(exp −5), indicating their synchronous formation ≤5 × 10(exp 4) years after the canonical CAI value. In contrast, no 26Mg excesses are observed in the WL rim anorthite, which suggests its later formation or later isotopic resetting in an 16O-rich gas reservoir, after 26Al had decayed.

Han, J.↗

NASA NTRS2016

Magnesium and Titanium Isotopic Compositions of an Unusual Hibonite-Perovskite Refractory Inclusion from Allende: It Is Fun

Introduction: Hibonite-rich refractory inclusions are among the first solids that formed in the solar nebula, and thus provide constraints on the earliest environment in the Solar System. An unusual hibonite-perovskite inclusion from Allende, SHAL, consists of a large (approximately 500 by 200 microns) single hibonite crystal and coexisting blocky perovskite (approximately 200 microns in size). The hibonite is characterized by chemical and oxygen isotopic compositions similar to those in the FUN (Fractionated and Unknown Nuclear anomalies) inclusion HAL. However, the rare earth element (REE) patterns measured at different spots of SHAL hibonite are highly variable, ranging from Group II-like (light REEs enriched relative to heavy REEs) to Group III-like (relatively flat with slight Eu depletions), but overall contrast largely with that of HAL, especially in the Ce and Yb abundances. This implies that SHAL hibonite formed and underwent distillation processes under more reducing conditions. Interestingly, the accompanying perovskite has uniform, unfractionated oxygen isotopic compositions (averaging delta (sup 17) O equals delta (sup 18) O equals −7 per mille) and REE abundances that are completely different from those of SHAL hibonite. This has been interpreted that perovskite and hibonite may not be co-genetic. Here we performed Al-Mg and Ti isotopic measurements of SHAL hibonite and perovskite to determine if the FUN characteristics are observed in these two isotope systems, and to further constrain the origin and evolution of SHAL. Results: Isotopic measurements of Al-Mg and Ti in SHAL were performed on the UCLA CAMECA ims-1290 ion microprobe by following the analytical protocols described in [1]. The Al-Mg and Ti data obtained in both terrestrial standards and SHAL hibonite and perovskite are shown below. Both SHAL hibonite and perovskite, despite very high (sup 27) Al to (sup 24) Mg ratios, are devoid of (sup 26) Mg excesses that can be attributed to the decay of (sup 26) Al. Delta (sup 25) Mg (mass-dependent fractionation) in hibonite is approximately −5 per mille per atomic mass unit relative to Madagascar hibonite, but is not well constrained for perovskite due to very large uncertainties owing to extremely low Mg contents. Similar to Mg isotopes, SHAL hibonite and perovskite show essentially the same Ti isotopic compositions, with anomalies in (sup 50) Ti of approximately 14 per mille, but the former shows greater Ti isotope fractionation than the latter (2.5 per mille per atomic mass unit versus 0 per mille). Discussion and Conclusions: The Al-Mg and Ti isotopic compositions of SHAL hibonite are consistent with those of HAL, suggesting that SHAL hibonite is a FUN inclusion and likely formed prior to homogenization of (sup 26) Al and Ti isotope variations in the solar nebula. However, the formation mechanisms for SHAL and HAL differ, given the differences in the REE patterns and degrees of oxygen mass-dependent fractionation. The Group-II to Group-III like REE patterns, the Yb depletions, and negative delta (sup 25) Mg observed in SHAL hibonite are all consistent with condensation of the hibonite precursor in a reducing environment.. The lack of large Ce depletions in SHAL hibonite implies that distillation processes that fractionated hibonite's oxygen isotopes must have taken place under a reducing condition, but the extent to which SHAL hibonite was distilled appears to be less than HAL because of the smaller degree of oxygen mass-dependent fractionation. The perovskite shares essentially the same Ti and Mg isotopic compositions as hibonite and probably formed in the same reservoir.. The ultrarefractory REE pattern seen in perovskite likely resulted from gas-solid fractionation which depleted HREEs in this reservoir. This process also explains why SHAL hibonite is generally depleted in HREEs relative to LREEs.

Liu, M.-C.↗