Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Liu, Y. Q.

Publications and source records attributed to Liu, Y. Q..

24 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2022

Toward holistic understanding of the ITER-like resonant magnetic perturbation (RMP) ELM control on KSTAR

Here, KSTAR has clarified a set of unresolved 3D physics issues utilizing the ITER-like in-vessel, three-row, resonant magnetic perturbation (RMP) configurations. Since RMP-driven, edge-localized-modes (ELMs)-crash control elevates the divertor heat flux peak through its impact on edge plasma parameters and transport, a series of intentionally misaligned RMP configurations (IMCs) have been explored to investigate the relationship between RMP ELM control and divertor heat fluxes, while searching for an ideal IMC that could be favorable in both aspects. First of all, the contrasting influence of kink vs anti-kink phasing on the ELM-crash suppression has been articulated, demonstrating the synergistic benefit of 'kink' phasing on ELM-crash-suppression. On the other hand, the three-row IMC in the anti-kink phasing becomes more insensitive to the ELM-crashes at the sub-marginal level of RMP, consistent with theory. Meanwhile, the divertor 'wetted' area of ELM-crash-suppression gets narrower than that of ELM-crash-mitigation, suggesting that ELM-crash-mitigation remains advantageous over ELM-crash-suppression in terms of time-averaged divertor thermal loading. In comparison, based on a set of two-row IMCs, no evidence of divertor heat flux broadening was found during ELM-crash-suppression, supporting a hypothesis that the dispersal of the divertor heat flux in three-row IMCs cannot be driven by helically structured two-row RMPs alone. Among ITER-like three-rows, lower two-row RMPs have been found to be much more effective in suppressing the ELM-crashes than upper two-row RMPs. Although it is quite preliminary, the up/down asymmetric dependence of RMP coupling may be generically attributed to lower-single-null plasmas. Such a holistic understanding of RMP-driven, ELM-crash-control in KSTAR is expected not only to elucidate various subtle points in the vicinity of ELM-crash-suppression, but also to clarify the relevant divertor thermal loading issues for ITER and beyond.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗
DOE OSTI2021

Divertor detachment in the pre-fusion power operation phase in ITER during application of resonant magnetic perturbations

Detachment of the divertor plasma during application of resonant magnetic perturbation (RMP) fields is evaluated for hydrogen H-mode plasma during the first pre-fusion power operation (PFPO-1) phase in ITER by 3D plasma boundary modelling with EMC3–EIRENE. Plasma response effects from a linearized, resistive, single fluid MHD model are discussed, which includes partial screening of the externally applied field—but also field amplification near the separatrix. Furthermore, this field amplification is found to play a pivotal role for the magnetic footprint on the divertor targets, but is sensitive to model parameters. Extensions of the footprint beyond the straight portions of the ITER vertical divertor targets, optimized for high stationary heat flux handling, may be possible depending on the level of toroidal rotation in the plasma. Exhaust from the bulk plasma is guided by the helical corrugations (lobes) of the perturbed separatrix, and this results in an upstream heat flux that is distributed over these lobes with lower peak values than in the typical radial heat flux profiles seen in the absence of magnetic perturbations. As a consequence, an earlier onset (with respect to the upstream density) of detachment is found in the traditional strike zone when RMPs are applied, but secondary, non-axisymmetric strike locations appear—and those remain attached at temperatures above 10 eV. Neon seeding can mitigate these non-axisymmetric heat loads, but this becomes less efficient for large magnetic footprints.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗
DOE OSTI2021

Passive deconfinement of runaway electrons using an in-vessel helical coil

A helical coil designed to passively generate non-axisymmetric fields during a plasma disruption is shown (via electromagnetic analysis, linear MHD modeling, and relativistic drift orbit tracing) to be effective at deconfining runaway electrons (REs) on a time scale significantly faster than the plasma current quench. Magnetic equilibria from DIII-D RE-producing scenarios are used to calculate the toroidal electric field generated during the current quench phase of a disruption, which in turn drives current in the proposed n = 1 in-vessel helical coil, without the need for any external power supplies or disruption detection or prediction techniques. Simulations of the plasma evolution using the TokSys GS Evolve code predict the inductive coupling of coil currents up to 12% of the pre-disruption plasma current into the helical coil. The coil geometry is parametrically varied to maximize both the non-resonant and resonant components of the 3D magnetic perturbation, resulting in δB/B ≈ 10 –2 and a vacuumisland overlapwidth of up to 0.7ψ N . The REORBIT module of the MARS-F code is used to model the full non-axisymmetric magnetic field and trace RE drift orbits to determine the effect on RE deconfinement, with up to 70% of the RE orbits lost after 0.2 ms. A two-stage evolution of the RE orbit loss fraction is observed to be caused by resonant trapping between multiple magnetic island chains. Finally, electromagnetic and thermal stresses on the coil are calculated to be within operational limits for installation in DIII-D, and scale favorably to a reactor-size device. Furthermore, these findings motivate future experimental study of the helical coil concept in DIII-D or other tokamaks.

3D coil↗
DOE OSTI2021

Screening of resonant magnetic perturbation fields assuming various plasma flow models

A recently updated version of the MARS-F code [Y. Q. Liu et al., Phys. Plasmas 7, 3681 (2000); L. Li et al., Phys. Plasmas 25, 082512 (2018); and G. L. Xia et al., Nucl. Fusion 59, 126035 (2019)] is utilized to numerically investigate the plasma screening effect on the applied resonant magnetic perturbation (RMP) field, assuming various equilibrium flow models, including the toroidal flow, the parallel flow and their combinations, and poloidal and toroidal projections of the parallel flow. A parallel equilibrium flow with a uniform radial profile is found to have no effect on plasma screening of the RMP field. A sheared parallel flow, however, does change plasma screening. The poloidal projection of the parallel flow weakens plasma screening in the resistive-inertial regime. The effect on the favorable average curvature regime is found, however, to be non-monotonic. With the increasing flow speed, the poloidal projection first weakens Glasser-Green-Johnson (GGJ)-screening. Further increase in the flow speed results in enhanced GGJ-screening again. This non-monotonic behavior is related to the perturbed parallel shielding current, which appears also off the mode rational surface at fast flow due to additional resonances between the RMP perturbation and the sound wave continuum. These results indicate that flow induced plasma screening to the RMP field can have complicated characteristics, which, in turn, can have implications on the RMP field penetration into the plasma in experiments for controlling the edge localized modes.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗
DOE OSTI2021

Magnetic-Confinement Fusion—Plasma Theory: Tokamak Magnetohydrodynamic Equilibrium and Stability

Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) provides a useful model to describe the crucial plasma macroscopic equilibrium and stability behaviors in toroidal tokamak devices by considering the plasma as a conducting fluid interacting with a surrounding confining electromagnetic field. MHD is the most basic plasma model, incorporating most large-scale phenomena, including plasma equilibrium and all major instabilities. MHD equations are obtained by taking moments of the Boltzmann equations for different plasma species. They provide a set of comprehensive physics constrains to compute and optimize the equilibrium plasma shape and pressure and current profiles that are critical to its stability and performance. In the ideal case, the equations have special properties that lead to efficient numerical calculation schemes, the most important of which is the ideal MHD energy principle for linear stability against small departures from equilibrium. In a tokamak plasma, equilibrium pressure is mostly destabilizing for MHD modes, whereas equilibrium current is also often a major driving force. Plasma resistivity creates new freedom for a MHD instability to grow, but there are also cases where the plasma resistivity plays a stabilizing role. Equilibrium toroidal flow and/or flow shear can affect MHD instabilities. Principal MHD instabilities include the internal kink mode, sawtooth, fishbone, external kink, resistive wall mode, resistive interchange, tearing and neoclassical tearing modes (NTMs), locked modes, toroidal Alfven eigenmodes (TAEs), and edge localized modes (ELMs). Fast-growing MHD instabilities can lead to an abrupt plasma disruption and termination that can potentially damage the device plasma facing components (PFCs) and in-vessel structures. Furthermore, an important MHD application is to develop robust techniques to mitigate and control MHD instabilities.

Dispersive pellet injection↗