Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Lobet, Guillaume

Publications and source records attributed to Lobet, Guillaume.

How exudates production along a phosphorus gradient influences mineral dissolution across contrasting soil development stages

Harnessing rhizosphere processes offers a valuable opportunity to optimize nutrient use efficiency in agroecosystems. In nutrient-limited soils, plants discharge part of photosynthate surplus via root exudation, including carboxylates, which may enhance mineral dissolution and nutrient mobilization. We aimed to assess how plant responses to nutrient limitation translated into changes in exudate profiles, and how these exudates, in turn, drive bioweathering processes across soils of contrasting mineralogy and weathering degree. We conducted a hydroponic experiment with Lupinus albus grown under five phosphorus (P) concentrations (5, 10, 20, 30, and 50 µM) over seven weeks. We measured plant biomass and root traits, performed a metabolomics analysis and quantified seven carboxylates in root exudates using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. To assess bioweathering processes across contrasted soil domains, we conducted batch dissolution tests with exudates using three soil horizons—35 each with distinct physicochemical properties: enriched in organic matter, iron oxides, or primary silicates. At the intermediate level of P supply, shoot biomass was comparable to that under high P, but plants produced more root biomass and a higher total carboxylate exudation rate. Despite low carboxylate concentrations (<100 ppb), exudates promoted the dissolution of Ca, Mg, Si, Fe, P and K in all horizons. Yet, the degree of element released varied among horizons. These findings highlight the importance of root exudates in enhancing mineral dissolution, with effects dependent on soil physicochemical properties. The results suggest that managing agroecosystems under moderate nutrient limitation could be a sustainable strategy to increase root-to-shoot ratios, enhance bioweathering processes and nutrient release in soil solution.

Pollet, Sasha L.↗

Uncovering natural variation in root system architecture and growth dynamics using a robotics-assisted phenomics platform

The plant kingdom contains a stunning array of complex morphologies easily observed above-ground, but more challenging to visualize below-ground. Understanding the magnitude of diversity in root distribution within the soil, termed root system architecture (RSA), is fundamental in determining how this trait contributes to species adaptation in local environments. Roots are the interface between the soil environment and the shoot system and therefore play a key role in anchorage, resource uptake, and stress resilience. Previously, we presented the GLO-Roots (Growth and Luminescence Observatory for Roots) system to study the RSA of soil-grown Arabidopsis thaliana plants from germination to maturity (Rellán-Álvarez et al., 2015). In this study, we present the automation of GLO-Roots using robotics and the development of image analysis pipelines in order to examine the temporal dynamic regulation of RSA and the broader natural variation of RSA in Arabidopsis , over time. These datasets describe the developmental dynamics of two independent panels of accessions and reveal highly complex and polygenic RSA traits that show significant correlation with climate variables of the accessions’ respective origins.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗

Call for Participation: Collaborative Benchmarking of Functional-Structural Root Architecture Models. The Case of Root Water Uptake

Three-dimensional models of root growth, architecture and function are becoming important tools that aid the design of agricultural management schemes and the selection of beneficial root traits. However, while benchmarking is common in many disciplines that use numerical models, such as natural and engineering sciences, functional-structural root architecture models have never been systematically compared. The following reasons might induce disagreement between the simulation results of different models: different representation of root growth, sink term of root water and solute uptake and representation of the rhizosphere. Presently, the extent of discrepancies is unknown, and a framework for quantitatively comparing functional-structural root architecture models is required. We propose, in a first step, to define benchmarking scenarios that test individual components of complex models: root architecture, water flow in soil and water flow in roots. While the latter two will focus mainly on comparing numerical aspects, the root architectural models have to be compared at a conceptual level as they generally differ in process representation. Therefore, defining common inputs that allow recreating reference root systems in all models will be a key challenge. In a second step, benchmarking scenarios for the coupled problems are defined. We expect that the results of step 1 will enable us to better interpret differences found in step 2. This benchmarking will result in a better understanding of the different models and contribute toward improving them. Improved models will allow us to simulate various scenarios with greater confidence and avoid bugs, numerical errors or conceptual misunderstandings. This work will set a standard for future model development.

Plant Sciences↗